Testing for maternal cell contamination in prenatal samples: A comprehensive survey of current diagnostic practices in 35 molecular diagnostic laboratories

Journal of Molecular Diagnostics

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 394-400

  Schrijver, Iris ^a   Cherny, Sarah C ^a   Zehnder, James L ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMNION FLUID ANALYSIS; AMNION FLUID CYTOLOGY; ARTICLE; CELL CULTURE; CHORION VILLUS SAMPLING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; MATERNAL CELL CONTAMINATION; MEDICAL SOCIETY; PATIENT CARE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRENATAL CARE; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; REFERENCE VALUE; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STANDARDIZATION;

EID: 34548176741     PISSN: 15251578     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2353/jmoldx.2007.070017     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Welch RA, Salem-Elgharib S, Wiktor AE, Van Dyke DL, Blessed WB: Operator experience and sample quality in genetic amniocentesis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006, 194:189-191
2. Seeds JW: Diagnostic mid trimester amniocentesis: how safe? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004, 191:607-615
3. Steed HL, Tomkins DJ, Wilson DR, Okun N, Mayes DC: Maternal cell contamination of amniotic fluid samples obtained by open needle versus trocar technique of amniocentesis. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2002, 24:233-236
4. Winsor EJ, Silver MP, Theve R, Wright M, Ward BE: Maternal cell contamination in uncultured amniotic fluid. Prenat Diagn 1996, 16:49-54
5. Saura R, Roux D, Taine L, Maugey B, Laulon D, Laplace JP, Horovitz J: Early amniocentesis versus chorionic villus sampling for fetal karyotyping. Lancet 1994, 344:825-826
6. Smith GW, Graham CA, Nevin J, Nevin NC: Detection of maternal cell contamination in amniotic fluid cell cultures using fluorescent labelled microsatellites. J Med Genet 1995, 32:61-64
7. Frederickson RM, Wang HS, Surh LC: Some caveats in PCR-based prenatal diagnosis on direct amniotic fluid versus cultured amniocytes. Prenat Diagn 1999, 19:113-117
8. Witters I, Devriendt K, Legius E, Matthijs G, Van Schoubroeck D, Van Assche FA, Fryns JP: Rapid prenatal diagnosis of trisomy 21 in 5049 consecutive uncultured amniotic fluid samples by fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH). Prenat Diagn 2002, 22:29-33
9. Batanian JR, Ledbetter DH, Fenwick RG: A simple VNTR-PCR method for detecting maternal cell contamination in prenatal diagnosis. Genet Test 1998, 2:347-350
10. Ward BE, Gersen SL, Carelli MP, McGuire NM, Dackowski WR, Weinstein M, Sandlin C, Warren R, Klinger KW: Rapid prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal aneuploidies by fluorescence in situ hybridization: clinical experience with 4,500 specimens. Am J Hum Genet 1993, 52:854-865
11. Antoniadi T, Yapijakis C, Kaminopetros P, Makatsoris C, Velissariou V, Vassilopoulos D, Petersen MB: A simple and effective approach for detecting maternal cell contamination in molecular prenatal diagnosis. Prenat Diagn 2002, 22:425-429
12. Tsang KS, Wong AP, Cheung MS, Tang SH, Leung Y, Li CK, Lau TT, Ng MH, Yuen PM: Implication of maternal-cell contamination in the clinical banking of umbilical cord blood. Cytotherapy 2002, 4:375-383
13. Bell KA, Van Deerlin PG, Haddad BR, Feinberg RF: Cytogenetic diagnosis of "normal 46, XX" karyotypes in spontaneous abortions frequently may be misleading. Fertil Steril 1999, 71:334-341
14. Le Bris MJ, Giovangrandi Y, Audrezet MP, Journel H, Ferec C: Confined placental trisomy 7: pitfall for cystic fibrosis prenatal diagnosis. Lancet 1994, 344:556