Researching inequality through interpretive collaborations: Shifting power and the unspoken contract

Qualitative Inquiry

Volumn 13, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 821-843

  Dodson, Lisa ^a   Piatelli, Deborah ^a   Schmalzbauer, Leah ^b  

^a BOSTON COLLEGE   (United States)

^b MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Collaboration; Inequality; Interpretation; Marginality; Power; Silence

Indexed keywords

EID: 34548172267     PISSN: 10778004     EISSN: 15527565     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1077800407304458     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Becker, H.S. (2004). Whose side are we on? In W. K. Carroll (Ed.), Critical strategies for social research (pp. 23-28). Toronto, ON, Canada: Canadian Scholar's Press.
2. Behar, R. (1993). Translated woman: Crossing the border with Esperanza's story. Boston: Beacon.
3. Buraway, M. (2004). Introduction. Public sociologies: A symposium from Boston College. Social Problems, 51 (1), 103-106.
4. Chavez, L. (1998). Shadowed lives: Undocumented immigrants in American society. New York: Harcourt Brace.
5. Coffey, A. (1999). The ethnographic self: Fieldwork and the representation of identity. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6. Collins, P.H. (1998). Black feminist thought. New York: Routledge.
7. DeVault, M.L. (1990). Talking and listening from women's standpoint. Social Problems, 37, 96-116.
8. DeVault, M.L. (1999). Liberating method: Feminism and social research. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
9. Dodson, L. (1998). Don't call us out of name: The untold lives of women and girls in poor America. Boston: Beacon.
10. Dodson, L., & Schmalzbauer, L. (2005). Poor women and habits of hiding: Participatory methods in poverty research. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 949-959.
11. Du Bois, W.E.B. (1903). The souls of Black folk. Millwood, NY: Kraus-Thomson.
12. Fine, M., Weis, L., Weseen, S., & Wong, L. (2000). For whom: Qualitative research, representations, and social responsibilities. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 107-131). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13. Frankenberg, R. (1993). White women, race matters: The social construction of Whiteness. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
14. Freire, P. (1981). Education for critical consciousness. New York: Continuum Press.
15. Gallagher, C.A. (2000). White like me? Methods, meaning, and manipulation in the field of White studies. In F. W. Twine & J. W. Warren (Eds.), Racing research, researching race: Methodological dilemmas in critical race studies (pp. 67-92). New York: New York University Press.
16. Gaventa, J., & Cornwall, A. (2001). Power and knowledge. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (pp. 70-80). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17. Gorelick, S. (1991). Contradictions of feminist methodology. Gender and Society, 5 (4), 459-476.
18. Gubrium, J.F., & Holstein, J.A. (1997). The new language of qualitative method. New York: Oxford University Press.
19. Harding, S. (1991). Whose science, whose knowledge? Thinking from women's lives. New York: Cornell Press.
20. Hawkesworth, M. (1989). Knowers, knowing, known: Feminist theory and claims of truth. Signs, 14 (3), 533-557.
21. Hurtado, A. (1996). Strategic suspensions: Feminists of color theorize the production of knowledge. In N. Goldberger, J. Tarule, B. Clinchy, & M. Belenky (Eds.), Knowledge, difference and power (pp. 372-392). New York: Basic Books.
22. Kirsch, G. (1999). Ethical dilemmas in feminist research: The politics of location, interpretation, and publication. Albany: State University of New York Press.
23. Ladson-Billings, G. (2000). Racialized discourses and ethnic epistemologies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. B. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 257-278). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24. Lal, J. (1996). Situating locations: The politics of self, identity, and other in living and writing the text. In D. Wolf (Ed.), Feminist dilemmas in fieldwork (pp. 185-214). Boulder, CO: Westview.
25. Lykes, B. (1989). Dialogue with Guatemalan Indian women: Critical perspectives on constructing collaborative research. In R. K. Unger (Ed.), Representations: Social construction of gender (pp. 167-185). Amityville, NY: Baywood.
26. Lykes, M.B., & Coquillon, E. (2006). Participatory and action research and feminisms: Towards transformative praxis. In S. N. Hesse-Biber (Ed.), Handbook of feminist research: Theory and praxis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27. Madriz, E. (2000). Focus groups in feminist research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. B. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 835-850). Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage.
28. Maguire, P. (1987). Doing participatory research. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts.
29. Mertens, D.M. (2003). Mixed methods and the politics of human research: The transformativeemancipatory perspective. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods (pp. 135-163). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30. Mies, M. (1983). Towards a methodology for a feminist research. In G. Bowles & R. D. Klien (Eds.), Theories of women's studies (pp. 117-139). Boston: Routledge.
31. Oakley, A. (1998). Gender, methodology and people's way of knowing: Some problems with feminism and the paradigm debate in social science. Sociology, 32 (4), 707-731.
32. Patai, D., & Gluck, S. B. (Eds.). (1991). Women's words: The feminist practice of oral history. New York: Routledge.
33. Pini, B. (2004). On being a nice country girl and an academic feminist: Using reflexivity in rural social research. Journal of Rural Studies, 20, 169-179.
34. Reason, P. (1994). Three approaches to participative inquiry. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 324-339). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35. Reinharz, S. (1992). Feminist methods in social research. New York: Oxford University Press.
36. Schmalzbauer, L. (2005). Striving and surviving: A daily life analysis of Honduran transnational families. New York: Routledge.
37. Scott, J. (1990). Domination and the arts of resistance: Hidden transcripts. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
38. Simpson, J.S. (1996). Easy talk, White talk, back talk: Some reflections on the meanings of our words. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 25 (3), 372-389.
39. Smith, D. (1987). The everyday world as problematic: A feminist sociology. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
40. Stacey, J. (1991). Can there by a feminist ethnography? In D. Patai & S. B. Gluck (Eds.), Women's words: The feminist practice of oral history (pp. 111-119). New York: Routledge.
41. Wasserfall, R.R. (1993). Reflexivity, feminism, and difference. Qualitative Sociology, 15 (1), 150-168.
42. Wolf, M. (1992). Thrice told tale: Feminism, postmodernism, and ethnographic responsibility. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.