Inclusive design evaluation and the capability-demand relationship

Designing Accessible Technology

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 177-188

  Persad, U ^a   Langdon, P M ^a   Clarkson, P J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34548164326     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1007/1-84628-365-5_18     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Clarkson PJ, Keates S (2003) User capabilities and product demands. In: Proceedings of INCLUDE 2003, Royal College of Art, London, UK
2. Dong H, Keates S, Clarkson PJ (2002) Inclusive design diagnosis based on the ONS scales? In: Proceedings of CWUAAT'02, Cambridge, UK
3. Hartson HR, Andre TS, Williges RC (2001) Criteria for evaluating usability evaluation methods. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 13(4): 373-410
4. Hartson HR (2003) Cognitive, physical, sensory, and functional affordances in interaction design. Behaviour and Information Technology 22(5): 315-338
5. Keates S, Clarkson PJ (2002) Defining design exclusion. In: Keates S et al. (eds.) Universal access and assistive technology. Springer, London, UK
6. Keates S, Clarkson PJ (2003) Countering design exclusion: an introduction to inclusive design. Springer, London, UK
7. Keates S, Clarkson PJ (2004) Assessing the accessibility of digital television set-top boxes. In: Keates S et al. (eds.) Designing a more inclusive world. Springer, London, UK
8. Kondraske GV (1995) A working model for human system-task interfaces. In: Bronzino JD (ed.) The biomedical engineering handbook. CRC Press, Boca Raton, USA
9. Langdon PM, Keates S, Clarkson PJ (2004) New cognitive capability scales for inclusive product design. In: Keates S et al. (eds.) Designing a more inclusive world. Springer, London, UK
10. Martin J, Elliot D (1992) Creating an overall measure of severity of disability for the office of population censuses and surveys disability survey. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, A, 155(Part 1): 121-140
11. Martin J, Meltzer H, Elliot D (1988) OPCS surveys of disability in Great Britain. Report 1 - the prevalence of disability among adults, HMSO, London
12. Norman DA (1990) The design of everyday things. Doubleday, New York, USA
13. Norman DA (1999) Affordances, conventions and design. Interactions 6(3): 38-42
14. Persad U, Langdon PM, Clarkson PJ (2005) Assessing user capabilities from small scale samples. In: Proceedings of HCI International 2005, Las Vegas, USA
15. Rizzo A, Marchigiani E, Andreadis A (1997) The AVANTI project: prototyping and evaluation with a cognitive walkthrough based on the Norman's model of action. In: Proceedings of DIS'97, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
16. Smith S, Norris B, Peebles L (2000) Older adult: the handbook of measurements and capabilities of the older adult data for design safety. Department of Trade and Industry, London, UK
17. Semmence J, Gault S, Hussain M, Hall P, Stanborough J et al. (1998) Family resources survey, Great Britain 1996-97. DSS, Corporate Document Services, UK
18. Stanton N (1998) Human factors in consumer products. Taylor and Francis, London, UK