|
Volumn 4, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 358-359
|
Which BPH treatment is the most clinically efficacious and cost-effective?: Commentary
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS;
COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS;
FOLLOW UP;
HEALTH CARE COST;
HOLMIUM LASER;
HOSPITALIZATION;
HUMAN;
INTERMETHOD COMPARISON;
LASER COAGULATION;
LOWER URINARY TRACT SYMPTOM;
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING;
MEDICAL LITERATURE;
MEDICAL RESEARCH;
MEDICAL SPECIALIST;
MEDICARE;
METHODOLOGY;
OUTCOME ASSESSMENT;
OUTPATIENT CARE;
POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
PROBABILITY;
PROSTATE HYPERTROPHY;
QUALITY OF LIFE;
REOPERATION;
SCORING SYSTEM;
SHORT SURVEY;
TRANSURETHRAL ELECTROVAPORIZATION;
TRANSURETHRAL MICROWAVE THERMOTHERAPY;
TRANSURETHRAL NEEDLE ABLATION;
TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
UROFLOWMETRY;
|
EID: 34548164061
PISSN: 17434270
EISSN: 17434289
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1038/ncpuro0806 Document Type: Short Survey |
Times cited : (1)
|
References (4)
|