The utility of the random controlled trial for evaluating sexual offender treatment: The gold standard or an inappropriate strategy?

Sexual Abuse: Journal of Research and Treatment

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 175-191

  Marshall, W L ^a   Marshall, L E ^a  

^a Rockwood Psychological Services   (Canada)

Author keywords

Critique; Random controlled trial; Sexual offenders; Treatment outcome

Indexed keywords

EID: 34548161358     PISSN: 10790632     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/107906320701900207     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Alexander, J-F., Barton, C., Schiavo, S., & Parsons, B. V. (1976). Systems-behavioral interventions with families of delinquents: Therapist characteristics, family behavior and outcome. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 44, 656-664.
2. Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (2003). The psychology of criminal conduct (3rd ed.). Cincinnati: Anderson.
3. Bakker, L., Hudson, S. M., Wales, D., & Riley, D. (1998). And there was light: Evaluating the Kia Marama Treatment Programme for New Zealand sex offenders against children. New Zealand Department of Corrections. http://www.corrections.govt.nz/public/pdf/research/kiamarama.pdf
4. Barbaree, H. E., Langton, C. M., & Peacock, E. J. (2003, October). The evaluation of sex offender treatment efficacy using samples stratified by levels of actuarial risk. Paper presented at the 22nd Annual Research and Treatment Conference of the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers. St. Louis.
5. Beech, A., & Ford, H. (2006). The relationship between risk, deviance, treatment outcome and sexual reconviction in a sample of child abusers completing residential treatment for their offending. Psychology, Crime & Law, 12, 685-701.
6. Beech, A., & Fordham, A. S. (1997). Therapeutic climate of sexual offender treatment programs. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 9, 219-237.
7. Beech, A., & Hamilton-Giachritsis, C. E. (2005). Relationship between therapeutic climate and treatment outcome in a group-based sexual offender program. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatments, 17, 127-140.
8. Berliner, L. (2002). Commentary. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 14, 195-197.
9. Boruch, R. F., & Gomez, J. (1977). Sensitivity, bias, and theory in impact evaluations. Professional Psychology, 8, 411-434.
10. Breiling, J. (2005, November). Lessons from Bio-Medical arena for determining how well treatment works. Paper presented at the 24th Annual Research and Treatment Conference of the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers, Salt Lake City, UT.
11. Cooke, D. J., & Philip, L. (2001). To treat or not to treat? An empirical perspective. In C. R. Hollin (Ed.), Handbook of offender assessment and treatment (pp. 17-34). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
12. Drapeau, M.(2005). Research on the processes involved in treating sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 17, 117-125.
13. Everitt, B. S., & Wessely, S. (2004). Clinical trials in psychiatry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14. Farrington, D. P., & Jolliffe, D. (2002). A feasibility study into using a randomized controlled trial to evaluate treatment pilots at JMP Whitemoor. Home Office Online Report 14/02. London: Home Office.
15. Fensterheim, H., & Raw, S. D. (1996). Psychotherapy research is not psychotherapy practice. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 3, 168-171.
16. Friendship, C., Mann, R. E., & Beech, A. (2003). Evaluation of a national prison-based treatment programme for sexual offenders in England and Wales. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18, 744-759.
17. Gendreau, P., & Andrews, D. A. (1990). Tertiary prevention: What the meta-analyses of the offender treatment literature tells us about "what works." Canadian Journal of Criminology, 32, 173-184.
18. Gendreau, P., & Goggin, C. (1996). Principles of effective correctional programming. Forum on Corrections Research, 8, 38-41.
19. Goetghebeur, E., & Loeys, T. (2002). Beyond intention to treat. Epidemiologic Reviews, 24, 850-890.
20. Goldfried, M. R., & Wolfe, B. (1996). Psychotherapy practice and research: Repairing a strained alliance. American Psychologist, 51, 1007-1016.
21. Gondolf, E. W. (2004). Evaluating batterer counseling programs: A difficult task showing some effects and implications. Aggression and Violent Behavior: A Review Journal, 9, 605-631.
22. Hanson, R. K., Gordon, A., Harris, J. J. R., Marques, J. K., Murphy, W. D., Quinsey, V. L., et al. (2002). First report of the Collaborative Outcome Data Project on the effectiveness of psychological treatment for sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 14, 167-192.
23. Hanson, R. K., & Harris, A. J. R. (2000). Where should we intervene: Dynamic predictors of sexual offence recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 27, 6-35.
24. Hanson, R. K., Steffy, R. A., & Gauthier, R. (1993). Long-term recidivism of child molesters. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 646-652.
25. Harkins, L., & Beech, A. (2006). Measurement of the effectiveness of sex offender treatment. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12, 36-44.
26. Harper, G., & Chitty, C. (Eds.) (2005). The impact of corrections on re-offending: A review of "what works" (p. 291). London: Home Office Research Study, 291.
27. Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., & Quinsey, V. L. (1998). Appraisal and management of risk in sexual aggression: Implications for criminal justice policy. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 4, 73-115.
28. Hedderman, C. (2004). Testing times: How policy and practice environment shaped the creation of "what works" evidence-base. Vista, 8, 182-188.
29. Hollin, C. R. (2006). Offending behaviour programmes and contention: Evidence-based practice, manuals, and programme evaluation. In C. R. Hollin, & E. J. Palmer (Eds.), Offending behaviour programmes: Development, application, and controversies (pp. 33-67). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
30. Howard, K. I., Moras, K., Brill, P. L., Martinovich, Z., & Lutz, W. (1996). Evaluation of psychotherapy: Efficacy, effectiveness, and patient progress. American Psychologist, 51, 1059-1064.
31. Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (1990). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
32. Kenworthy, T., Adams, C. E., Bilby, D., Brooks-Gordon, B., & Fenton, M. (2004). Psychological interventions for those who have sexually offended or are at risk of offending. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Issue 4. Art. No.: CD004858. DOI 10.1002/14651858. CD004858.
33. Keppel, G. (1991). Design and analysis: A researcher's handbook. Upper Saddle, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
34. Lambie, I., & Seymour, F. (2006). One size does not fit all: Future directions for the treatment of sexually abusive youth in New Zealand. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 12, 175-187.
35. Laws, D. R., & Ward, T. (2006). When one size doesn't fit all: The reformulation of relapse prevention. In W. L. Marshall, Y. M. Fernandez, L. E. Marshall, & G. A. Serran (Eds.), Sexual offender treatment: Controversial issues (pp. 241-254). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
36. Lipsey, M. W. (1990). Design sensitivity: Statistical power for experimental research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
37. Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (1993). The efficacy of psychological, educational, and behavioral treatment: Confirmation from meta-analyses. American Psychologist, 48, 1181-1209.
38. Looman, J., Abracen, J., & Nicholaichuk, T. P. (2000). Recidivism among treated sexual offenders and matched controls. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15, 279-290.
39. Mann, R. E., Ginsburg, J., & Weekes, J. (2002). Motivational interviewing with offenders. In M. McMurran (Ed.), Motivating offenders to change: A guide to enhancing engagement in therapy (pp. 87-102). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
40. Mann, R. E., Webster, S. D., Schofield, C., & Marshall, W. L. (2004). Approach versus avoidance goals in relapse prevention with sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 16, 65-75.
41. Marlatt, G. A. (1985). Cognitive factors in the relapse process. In G. A. Marlatt, & J. R. Gordon (Eds.), Relapse prevention: Maintenance strategies in the treatment of addictive disorders (pp. 128-200) New York: Guilford Press.
42. Marlatt, G. A. (2000). Foreword. In D. R. Laws, S. M. Hudson, & T. Ward (Eds.), Remaking relapse prevention with sex offenders: A sourcebook (pp. ix-xiv). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
43. Marques, J. K., & Murphy, W. (2004, October). Random assignment designs. Paper presented at the 23rd Annual Research and Treatment Conference of the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers, Albuquerque, NM.
44. Marques, J. K., Nelson, C., Alarcon, J-M., & Day, D. M. (2000). Preventing relapse in sex offenders: What we learned from SOTEP's experimental treatment program. In D. R. Laws, S. M. Hudson, & T. Ward (Eds.), Remaking relapse prevention with sex offenders: A sourcebook (pp. 321-340). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
45. Marques, J. K., Weideranders, M., Day, D. M., Nelson, C., & van Ommeren, A. (2005). Effects of a relapse prevention program on sexual recidivism: Final results from California's Sex Offender Treatment and Evaluation Project (SOTEP). Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment and Evaluation, 17, 79-107.
46. Marshall, W. L. (1993). The treatment of sex offenders: What does the outcome data tell us? A reply to Quinsey et al. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 8, 524-530.
47. Marshall, W. L. (2005). Therapist style in sexual offender treatment: Influence on indices of change. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Ttreatment, 17, 109-116.
48. Marshall, W. L. (2006). Appraising treatment outcome with sexual offenders. In W. L. Marshall, Y. M. Fernandez, L. E. Marshall, & G. A. Serran (Eds.), Sexual offender treatment: Controversial issues (pp. 255-273). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
49. Marshall, W. L., & Laws, D. R. (2003). A brief history of behavioural and cognitive-behavioural approaches to sexual offender treatment: Part 2. The modern era. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 15, 93-120.
50. Marshall, W. L., & Pithers, W. D. (1994). A reconsideration of treatment outcome with sex offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 21, 10-27.
51. Marshall, W. L., Fernandez, Y. M., Serran, G. A., Mulloy, R., Thornton, D., Mann, R. E., et al. (2003). Process variables in the treatment of sexual offenders: A review of relevant literature. Aggression and Violent Behavior: A Review Journal, 8, 205-234.
52. Marshall, W. L., Marshall, L. E., Serran, G. A., & Fernandez, Y. M. (2006). Treating sexual offenders: An integrated approach. New York: Routledge.
53. Marshall, W. L., Serran, G. A., Fernandez, Y. M., Mulloy, R., Mann, R. E., & Thornton, D. (2003). Therapist characteristics in the treatment of sexual offenders: Tentative data on their relationship with indices of behavior change. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 9, 25-30.
54. Marshall, W. L., Serran, G. A., Moulden, H., Mulloy, R., Fernandez, Y. M., Mann, R. E., et al. (2002). Therapist features in sexual offender treatment: Their reliable identification and influence on behavior change. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 9, 395-405.
55. Marshall, W. L., Ward, T., Mann, R. E., Moulden, H., Fernandez, Y. M., Serran, G. A., et al. (2005). Working positively with sexual offenders: Maximizing the effectiveness of treatment. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20, 1096-1114.
56. Martin, D. J., Garske, J. P., & Davis, M. K. (2000). Relation of the therapeutic alliance with outcome and other variables: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 438-450.
57. McConaghy, N. (1999). Methodological issues concerning evaluation of treatment for sexual offenders: Randomization, treatment dropout, untreated controls, and within-treatment studies. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 11, 183-193.
58. Munro, A. J. (2005). The conventional wisdom and activities of the middle range. The British Journal of Radiology, 78, 381-383.
59. Nicholaichuk, T., Gordon, A., Gu, D., & Wong, S. (2000). Outcome of an institutional sexual offender treatment program: A comparison between treated and matched untreated offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 12, 139-153.
60. Persons, J. B. (1991). Psychotherapy outcome studies do not accurately represent current models of psychotherapy: A proposed remedy. American Psychologist, 46, 99-106.
61. Persons, J. B., & Silberschatz, G. (1998). Are the results of randomized controlled trials useful to psychotherapists? Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 126-135.
62. Quinsey, V. L., Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., & Lalumière, M. L. (1993). Assessing treatment efficacy in outcome studies of sex offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 8, 512-523.
63. Quinsey, V. L., Khanna, A., & Malcolm, P. B. (1998). A retrospective evaluation of the Regional Treatment Centre sex offender treatment program. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 13, 621-644.
64. Rice, M. E., & Harris, G. T. (1997). The treatment of adult offenders. In D. M. Stoff, J. Breiling, & J. D. Maser (Eds.), Handbook of Antisocial Behavior (pp. 425-435). New York: Wiley.
65. Rice, M. E., & Harris, G. T. (2003). The size and sign of treatment effects in sex offender therapy. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 989, 428-440.
66. Rice, M. E., Quinsey, V. L., & Harris, G. T. (1991). Sexual recidivism among child molesters released from a maximum-security psychiatric institution. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 381-386.
67. Schaap, C., Bennun, I., Schindler, L., & Hoogduin, K. (1993). The therapeutic relationship in behavioural psychotherapy. New York: Wiley.
68. Seligman, M. E. P. (1995). The effectiveness of psychotherapy: The Consumer Reports Study. American Psychologist, 50, 965-974.
69. Seligman, M. E. P. (1996). Science as an ally of practice. American Psychologist, 51, 1072-1079.
70. Seligman, M. E. P., & Levant, R. F. (1998). Managed care policies rely on inadequate science. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 29, 211-212.
71. Seto, M. (2005, November). The evolution of sex offender treatment: Taking the next step. Paper presented at the 24th Annual Research and Treatment Conference of the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers, Salt Lake City, UT.
72. Silberschatz, G., & Curtis, J. R. (1993). Measuring the therapist's impact on the patient's therapeutic progress. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61, 403-411.
73. Silberschatz, G., Fretter, P. B., & Curtis, J. T. (1986). How do interpretations influence the process of psychotherapy? Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54, 646-652.
74. Slade, M., & Priebe, S. (2001). Are randomized controlled trials the only gold that glitters? British Journal of Psychiatry, 179, 286-287.
75. Stephenson, J., & Imrie, J. (1998). Why do we need randomized controlled trials to assess behavioural interventions? British Medical Journal, 316, 611-613.
76. Thornton, D. (2002). Constructing and testing a framework for dynamic risk assessment. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 14, 139-154.
77. Ward, T., & Marshall, W. L. (2004). Good lives, aetiology and the rehabilitation of sex offenders: A bridging theory. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 10, 153-169.
78. Wilson, D. B., Bouffard, L. A., & Mackenzie, D. L. (2005). A quantitative review of structured, group-orientated, cognitive-behavioral programs for offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 32, 172-204.
79. Wilson, G. T. (1996). Manual-based treatments: The clinical application of research findings. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 34, 295-314.