Evidence Based Guidelines. Still Fit for Purpose or Past Their Sell By Date?

Clinical Oncology

Volumn 19, Issue 8, 2007, Pages 591-592

  Howard, G C W ^a   Hoskin, P J ^b  

^a WESTERN GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b MOUNT VERNON HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CANCER RESEARCH; CLINICAL PRACTICE; EDITORIAL; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; GOOD CLINICAL PRACTICE; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL INFORMATION; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; PATIENT CARE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION;

EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; NEOPLASMS; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; STATE MEDICINE;

EID: 34548160022     PISSN: 09366555     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2007.07.012     Document Type: Editorial

References (6)

1. Williams M.V., James N.D., Summers E.T., Barrett A., and Ash D.V. National Survey of Radiotherapy Fractionation Practice 2003. Clin Oncol 18 (2006) 3-14
2. Nicholas Timmins 1998. "A terrible beauty". The Financial Times weekend July the 4th and 5th.
3. Howard G.C.W. Cancer Guidelines. Clin Oncol 13 (2001) 320-321
4. Neal D.E. SIGN: No.85-Management of Transitional Cell carcinoma of the Bladder. Clin Oncol 18 (2006) 700-701
5. Reed. National Clinical Guidelines for the management of Breast cancer in Women. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. Clin Oncol 19 (2007) 588-590
6. Adamson D.J.A. Response from SIGN. Clin Oncol 19 (2007) 628