Comparison of intraoperative parameters and perioperative complications of retroperitoneal and transperitoneal approaches to laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: Support for a retroperitoneal approach in selected patients

Journal of Endourology

Volumn 21, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 754-759

  Kieran, Kathleen ^a   Montgomery, Jeffrey S ^a   Daignault, Stephanie ^a   Roberts, William W ^a   Wolf Jr , J Stuart ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; CANCER SURGERY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; KIDNEY TUMOR; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPERATION DURATION; PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROPERITONEUM; SURGICAL APPROACH; TUMOR VOLUME;

BLOOD LOSS, SURGICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEPHRECTOMY; PATIENT SELECTION; PERITONEUM; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RETROPERITONEAL SPACE; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 34548152486     PISSN: 08927790     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/end.2007.0337     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Jayson M, Sanders H. Increased incidence of serendipitously discovered renal cell carcinoma. Urology 1998;51:203.
2. Hafez KS, Fergany AM, Novick AC. Nephron sparing surgery for localized renal cell carcinoma: Impact of tumor size on patient survival, tumor recurrence and TNM staging. J Urol 1999;162:1930.
3. Patard J-J, Shvarts O, Lam JS, et al. Safety and efficacy of partial nephrectomy for all T1 tumors based on an international multicenter experience. J Urol 2004;171:2181.
4. Makhoul B, Taille A de la, Vordos D, et al. Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for T1 renal cancer: The gold standard? A comparison of laparoscopic vs open nephrectomy. BJU Int 2004;93:67.
5. Gill IS, Matin SF, Desai MM, et al. Comparative analysis of laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy for renal tumors in 200 patients. J Urol 2003;170:64.
6. Dunn MD, Portis AJ, Shalhav AL, et al. Laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy: A 9-year experience. J Urol 2000;164:1153.
7. Meraney AM, Gill IS. Financial analysis of open versus laparoscopic radical nephrectomy and nephroureterectomy. J Urol 2002; 167:1757.
8. Iwamura M, Tsumura H, Matsu D, et al. Port site recurrence of renal cell carcinoma following retroperitoneoscopic radical nephrectomy with manual extraction without using entrapment sac or wound protector. J Urol 2004;171:1234.
9. Chan DY, Cadeddu JA, Jarrett TW, et al. Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: Cancer control for renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 2001; 166:2095.
10. Cadeddu JA, Ono Y, Clayman RV, et al. Laparoscopic nephrectomy for renal cell cancer: Evaluation of efficacy and safety: A multicenter experience. Urology 1998;72:773.
11. Saika T, Ono Y, Hattori R, et al. Long-term outcome of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for pathologic T1 renal cell carcinoma. Urology 2003;62:1018.
12. Gill IS, Colombo JR Jr, Frank I, et al. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for hilar tumors. J Urol 2005;174:850.
13. Ng CS, Gill IS, Steinberg AP, et al. Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: Patient selection and perioperative outcomes. J Urol 2005;174:846.
14. Viterbo R, Greenberg RE, Al-Saleem T, Uzzo RG. Prior abdominal surgery and radiation do not complicate the retroperitoneoscopic approach to the kidney or adrenal gland. J Urol 2005;174: 448.
15. Meraney AM, Samee, AA-E, Gill IS. Vascular and bowel complications during retroperitoneal laparoscopic surgery. J Urol 2002;168:1941.
16. Bishoff JT, Allaf ME, Kirkels W, Moore RG, Kavoussi LR, Schroder F. Laparoscopic bowel injury: Incidence and clinical presentation. J Urol 1999;161:887.
17. Wadstrom J. Hand-assisted retroperitoneoscopic live donor nephrectomy: Experience from the first 75 consecutive cases. Transplantation 2005;80:1060.
18. Takeda M, Go H, Watanabe R, et al. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy for functioning adrenal tumors: Comparison with conventional transperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy. J Urol 1997;157:19.
19. Matin SF, Gill IS. Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: Retroperitoneal versus transperitoneal approach. Curr Urol Rep 2002;3:164.
20. Sung GT, Gill IS. Anatomic landmarks and time management during retroperitoneoscopic radical nephrectomy. J Endourol 2002;16: 165.
21. Vallancien G, Cathelineau X, Baumert H, et al. Complications of transperitoneal laparoscopic surgery in urology: Review of 1,311 procedures at a single center. J Urol 2002;168:23.
22. Hollenbeck BK, Seifman BD, Wolf JS Jr. Clinical skills acquisition for hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. J Urol 2004;171:35.
23. Rassweiler JJ, Seemann O, Frede T, Henkel TO, Aiken P. Retroperitoneoscopy: Experience with 200 cases. J Urol 1998;160:1265.
24. Ramani AP, Desai MM, Steinberg AP, et al. Complications of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in 200 cases. J Urol 2005;173:42.
25. Johnston WK III, Montgomery JS, Wolf JS Jr. Retroperitoneoscopic radical and partial nephrectomy in the patient with cirrhosis. J Urol 2005;173:1094.
26. Sato Y, Tanda H, Kato S, et al. 100-Minute retroperitoneoscopic radical nephrectomy: A new retroperitoneal approach with a hand assisted method. J Urol 2005;174:53.