Selection bias resulting from the requirement for prior consent in observational research: A community cohort of people with ischaemic heart disease

Heart

Volumn 93, Issue 9, 2007, Pages 1116-1120

  Buckley, Brian ^a   Murphy, Andrew W ^a   Byrne, Molly ^a   Glynn, Liam ^a  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND   (Ireland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHOLESTEROL;

AGED; ARTICLE; CARDIOVASCULAR RISK; CHOLESTEROL BLOOD LEVEL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; QUESTIONNAIRE; SMOKING HABIT; SYSTEMATIC ERROR;

AGED; EPIDEMIOLOGIC METHODS; FAMILY PRACTICE; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL ISCHEMIA; PATIENT SELECTION; PROGNOSIS; SELECTION BIAS;

EID: 34548147251     PISSN: 13556037     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/hrt.2006.111591     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Medical Research Council. Personal information in medical research. London: Medical Research Council, 2000.
2. Anonymous. An information guide to the data proctection acts for general practitioners, Irish College of General Practitioners/National General Practice Information Technology Group, 2003.
3. Data Protection Commissioner. Data Protection Acts 1988 and 2003: a compendium. Dublin: Office of the Data Protection Commissioner, 2003.
4. Data Protection Commissioner. Data Protection (Amendment) Act 2003: a summary guide. Dublin: The Office of the Data Protection Commissioner, 2003.
5. Anonymous. Health information: a national strategy. Dublin: Department of Health and Children, 2004.
6. Department of Health. Research governance framework for health and social care, 2nd ed. London: Department of Health, 2005.
7. Academy of Medical Sciences. Personal data for public good: using health information in medical research. London: The Academy of Medical Sciences, 2006, Available at http://www.acmedsci.ac.uk (accessed 3 June 2007).
8. Kalra D, Gertz R, Singieton P, et al. Confidentiality of personal health information used for research. BMJ 2006;333:196-8.
9. Robling MR, Hood K, Houston H, et al. Public attitudes towards the use of primary care patient record data in medical research without consent: a qualitative study. J Med Ethics 2004;30:104-9.
10. Singleton P, Wadsworth M. Consent for the use of personal medical data in research. BMJ 2006;333:255-8.
11. Stone MA, Redsell SA, Ling JT, et al. Sharing patient data: competing demands of privacy, trust and research in primary care. Br J Gen Pract 2005;55:783-9.
12. Baker R, Shiels C, Stevenson K, et al. What proportion of patients refuse consent to data collection from their records for research purposes? Br J Gen Pract 2000;50:655-6.
13. Willison DJ, Keshavjee K, Nair K, et al. Patients' consent preferences for research uses of information in electronic medical records: interview and survey data. BMJ 2003;326:373-7.
14. Cousins G, McGee H, Ring L, et al. Public perceptions of biomedical research: a survey of the general population in Ireland. Dublin: Health Research Board, 2005.
15. Al-Shahi R, Vousden C, Warlow C, for the Scottish Intracranial Vascular Malformation Study (SIVMS) Steering Committee, et al. Bias from requiring explicit consent from all participants in observational research: prospective, population based study. BMJ 2005;331:942.
16. Al-Shahi R, Warlow C. Using patient-identifiable data for observational research and audit. BMJ 2000;321:1031-2.
17. Dawson AJ. Commentary: Methodological reasons for not gaining prior informed consent are sometimes justified. BMJ 2004;329:87-8.
18. Jacobsen SJ, Xia Z, Campion ME, et al. Potential effect of authorization bias on medical record research. Mayo Clin Proc 1999;74:330-8.
19. Regidor E. The use of personal data from medical records and biological materials: ethical perspectives and the basis for legal restrictions in health research. Soc Sci Med 2004;59:1975-84.
20. Tu JV, Willison DJ, Silver FL, et al. Impracticability of informed consent in the registry of the Canadian stroke network. N Engl J Med 2004;350:1414-21.
21. Angus VC, Entwistle VA, Emslie MJ, et al. The requirement for prior consent to participate on survey response rates: a population-based survey in Grampian. BMC Health Serv Res 2003;3:21.
22. Byrne M, Murphy AW, Walsh JC, et al. A cross-sectional study of secondary cardiac care in general practice: impact of personal and practice characteristics. Fam Pract 2006;23:295-302.
23. WHO. Diet, nutrition and prevention of chronic disease, Report of a WHO study group. WHO Technical Report Series 797. Geneva: World Health Organisation, 1990.
24. Wood D, De Backer G, Faergeman O, et al. Prevention of coronary heart disease in clinical practice: recommendations of the Second Joint Task Force of European and other Societies on Coronary Prevention. Eur Heart J 1998;19:1434-503.
25. Godin G, Shephard RJ. A simple method to assess exercise behavior in the community. Can J Appl Sport Sci 1985;10:141-6.
26. European Community. Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data. Official Journal of the European Communities, 1995;L:31-35.