A prospective research on the hedgerow's 'source' function;Recherche prospective sur le rôle « source » des haies en production fruitière intégrée. Le cas des perce-oreilles : Forficula auricularia L. et Forficula pubescens Gené

Comptes Rendus - Biologies

Volumn 330, Issue 9, 2007, Pages 664-673

  Debras, Jean François ^a   Dussaud, Audrey ^a   Rieux, René ^a   Dutoit, Thierry ^b  

^a Domaine Saint Paul   (France)

^b UAPV   (France)

Author keywords

Cacopsylla pyri; Dispersal; Field boundary; Forficulidae; Integrated pest management; Mixed hedgerow; Pear tree

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL CONTROL; DISPERSAL; HEDGEROW; ORCHARD; PEST CONTROL; SPECIES OCCURRENCE; TREE;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL PEST CONTROL; INSECT; INSECT CONTROL; INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT; NATURAL ENEMY; NONHUMAN; ORCHARD; PEAR; PLANT INSECT INTERACTION; POPULATION DISPERSAL; POPULATION MOVEMENT PATTERN; PREDATOR PREY INTERACTION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY;

ANIMALS; FRANCE; FRUIT; INSECTS; PLANT DISEASES; PREDATORY BEHAVIOR; TREES;

CACOPSYLLA PYRI; FORFICULA AURICULARIA; FORFICULA PUBESCENS; FORFICULIDAE; PYRUS;

EID: 34548140529     PISSN: 16310691     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.crvi.2007.07.003     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Burdon J.J., and Chilvers G.A. Host density as a factor in plant disease ecology. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 20 (1982) 143-166
2. Woolhouse M.E.J., and Harmsen R. Just how instable are agroecosystems?. Can. J. Zool. 65 (1997) 1577-1580
3. Southwood T.R.E., Brown V.K., and Reader P.M. The relationships of plant and insect diversities in succession. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 12 (1979) 327-348
4. Tilman D. The influence of functional diversity and composition on ecosystem processes. Science 277 (1997) 1300-1302
5. Russel P.E. Enemies hypothesis: A review of the effect of vegetational diversity on predatory insects and parasitoides. Environ. Entomol. 18 4 (1989) 590-599
6. Kreiter S., Tixier M.-S., Croft B., Auger P., and Barret D. Plants and leaf characteristics influencing the predaceous mite Kampimodromus aberrans in habitats surrounding vineyards. Environ. Entomol. 31 4 (2002) 648-660
7. Burel F. Landscape structure effects on carabid beetles spatial patterns in western France, Landscape Ecol. 2 4 (1989) 215-226
8. Fournier E., and Loreau M. Respective roles of recent hedges and forest patch remnants in the maintenance of ground beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) diversity in an agricultural landscape, Landscape Ecol. 16 (2001) 17-32
9. Tilman D. Competition and biodiversity in spatially structured habitats. Ecology 75 1 (1994) 2-16
10. Doak D.F., Bigger D., Harding E.K., Marvier M.A., O'Malley R.E., and Thomson D. The statistical inevitability of stability-diversity relationships in community ecology. Am. Nat. 151 3 (1998) 264-276
11. Tilman D., Lehman C.L., and Bristow C.E. Diversity-stability relationship: statistical inevitability or ecological consequence. Am. Nat. 151 (1998) 277-282
12. Naeem S., and Li S. Biodiversity enhances ecosystem reliability. Nature 390 (1997) 507-509
13. Grashof-Bokdam C.J., and van Langevelde F. Green veining: ladscape determinants of biodiversity in European agricultural landscapes. Landscape Ecol. 20 (2004) 417-439
14. Forman R.T.T., and Baudry J. Hedgerows and hedgerows networks in landscape ecology. Environ. Manage. 8 (1984) 449-510
15. Coombes D.S., and Sotherton N.W. The dispersal and distribution of polyphagous predatory Coleopteran in Cereals. Ann. Appl. Biol. 108 (1986) 461-474
16. Duelli P., Studer M., Marchand L., and Jakob S. Population movements of arthropods between natural and cultivated areas. Biol. Conserv. 54 (1990) 193-207
17. Dennis P., and Fry G.L.A. Field margins: can they enhance natural enemy population densities and general arthropod diversity on farmland?. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 40 1-4 (1992) 95-115
18. Bugg R.L., and Waddington C. Using cover crops to manage arthropods pests of orchards. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 50 (1994) 11-28
19. Zangger A., Lys J.A., and Nentwig W. Increasing the availability of food and the reproduction of Poecilus cupreus in a cereal field by strip-management. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 71 2 (1994) 111-120
20. Rieux R., Simon S., and Defrance H. Role of hedgerows and ground cover management on arthropod populations in pear orchards. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 73 2 (1999) 119-127
21. Cortesero A.M., Stapel J.O., and Lewis W.J. Understanding and manipulating plant attributes to enhance biological control. Biol. Control 17 1 (2000) 35-49
22. J.-F. Debras, Optimisation du choix des essences d'une haie composite pour lutter contre le psylle du poirier Cacopsylla pyri L., mémoire (ingénieur diplômé par l'État), option Agriculture, Ensam, Montpellier, 2001 (82 p.)
23. F. Burel, Dynamique d'un paysage réseaux et flux biologiques, thèse d'État, université Rennes-1, 1991 (235 p.)
24. Petit S., and Burel F. Movements of Abax ater: do forest species survive in hedgerow networks?. Vie et Milieu 43 (1993) 1119-1224
25. Fournier E., and Loreau M. Foraging activity of the carabid beetle Pterostichus melanarius Ill. in field margin habitat. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 89 (2002) 253-259
26. Thiele H.U. Carabid Beetles in their Environments (1997), Springer Verlag, Berlin (369 p.)
27. Maudsley M., Seeley B., and Lewis O. Spatial distribution patterns of predatory arthropods within an English hedgerow in early winter in relation to habitat variables. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 89 1-2 (2002) 77-89
28. Lewis T. The diversity of the insect fauna in a hedgerow and neighbouring fields. J. Appl. Ecol. 6 (1969) 443-452
29. Paoletti M.G., Boscolo P., and Sommaggio D. Beneficial insects in fields surrounded by hedgerows in north-eastern Italy. Biol. Agric. Hortic. 15 1-4 (1997) 311-323
30. Noss R.F. Corridors in real landscapes: a reply to Simberloff and Cox. Conserv. Biol. 1 (1987) 159-164
31. D. Dawson, Are habitat corridors conduits for animals and plants in fragmented landscapes?, English Nature Research Report, Peterborough, UK, 1994 (89 p.)
32. Haddad N.M., Rosenberg D.K., and Noon B.R. On experimentation and the study of corridors: response to Beier and Noss. Conserv. Biol. 14 (2000) 1543
33. S. Simon, Incidence de l'environnement végétal sur les populations d'arthropodes du verger de poiriers, thèse, Montpellier, Avignon, 1999 (206 p.)
34. J. Buxton, The biology of the European earwig, Forficula auricularia L. with references to its predatory activities on the danson-hop aphid, Phorodon humuli (Shrank), University of London, 1974 (222 p.)
35. Carrol D.P., and Hoyt S.C. Augmentation of European earwig (Dermaptera, Forficulidae) for biological control of apple aphid (Homoptera, Aphididae) in an apple orchard. J. Econ. Entomol. 77 (1984) 738-740
36. J.R. Carillo, Ecology of an aphid predation by the European earwig, Forficula auricularia L. in grassland and barley, PhD thesis, Southampton, UK, 1985 (198 p.)
37. Blommers L.H. Integrated pest management in European apple orchards. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 39 (1994) 213-224
38. Asante S.K. Functional-responses of the European earwig and 2 species of coccinellids to densities of Eriosoma-Lanigerum (Hausmann) (Hemiptera, Aphididae). J. Aust. Entomol. Soc. 34 (1995) 105-109
39. Weiss M.J., and McDonald G. L. European earwig, Forficula auricularia (Dermaptera: Forficulidae), as a predator of the redlegged earth mite, Halotydeus destructor (Tucker) (Acarina: Penthaleidae). Aust. J. Entomol. 37 (1998) 183-185
40. Solomon M.G., Cross J.V., Fitz Gerald J.D., Campbell C.A.M., Jolly R.L., Olszak R.W., Niemczyk E., and Vogt H. Biocontrol of pests of apples and pears in northern and central Europe - 3. Predators. Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 10 2 (2000) 91-128
41. Nicholas A.H., Spooner-Hart R.N., and Vickers R.A. Abundance and natural control of the woolly aphid Eriosoma lanigerum in an Australian apple orchard IPM program. Biocontrol 50 2 (2005) 271-291
42. Burnip G.M., Daly J.M., Hackett J.K., and Suckling D.M. European earwig phenology and effect of understorey management on population estimation. N.Z. Plant. Prot. 55 (2002) 390-395
43. Sauphanor B. An aggregation pheromone in the European earwig, Forficula auricularia. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 62 3 (1992) 285-291
44. Sauphanor B., and Sureau F. Aggregation behaviour and interspecific relationships in Dermaptera. Oecologia 96 (1993) 360-364
45. Suckling D.M., Burnip G.M., Hackett J., and Daly J.-C. Frass sampling and baiting indicate European earwig (Forficula auricularia) foraging in orchards. J. Appl. Entomol. 130 5 (2006) 263-267
46. Debras J.-F., Cousin M., and Rieux R. Choix des essences végétales pour la mise en place d'une haie composite destinée à lutter contre le psylle du poirier Cacopsylla pyri (L.) (Hemiptera : Psyllidae). Adalia 49 (2002) 19-23
47. Garcia-Chapa M., Sabate J., Lavin A., and Batlle A. Role of Cacopsylla pyri in the epidemiology of pear decline in Spain. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 111 (2005) 9-17
48. Friedrich H., Delate K., Domoto P., Nonnecke G., and Wilson L. Effect of organic pest management practices on apple productivity and apple food safety. Biol. Agric. Hortic. 21 1 (2003) 1-14
49. Helsen M., Vaal F., and Blommers L. Phenology of the common earwig Forficula auricularia L (Dermaptera : Forficulidae) in an apple orchard, Int. J. Pest Manage. 44 2 (1998) 75-79
50. Delate K., Mackern A., and Rosmann D. An examination of kaolin particle film for insect pest management in organic winter squash. http://www.organicaginfo.org/2005
51. Saour G. Efficacy of kaolin particle film and selected synthetic insecticides against pistachio psyllid Agonoscena targionii (Homoptera: Psyllidae) infestation. Crop Prot. 24 8 (2005) 711-717
52. Guyot G. Brise-vent et rideaux abris avec référence particulière aux zones sèches (1986), FAO, Rome (380 p.)
53. A. Lyoussoufi, Bioécologie et dynamique de population du psylle du poirier Cacopsylla pyri L. Influence de la phénologie et de la structure de l'arbre, thèse, université de droit, économie et sciences Aix-Marseille, 1994 (344 p.)
54. Lamb R. Life history and population characteristics of the European earwig, Forficula auricularia (Dermaptera, Forficulidae), at Vancouver, British Columbia. Can. Entomol. 107 (1975) 819-824
55. Landais E., and Deffontaines J.-P. Les pratiques des agriculteurs, point de vue sur un courant nouveau de la recherche agronomique. Etudes rurales 109 (1988) 53-65
56. Koji S., Khan Z.R., and Midega C.A.O. Field boundaries of Panicum maximum as a reservoir for predators and a sink for Chilo partellus. J. Appl. Entomol. 131 3 (2007) 186-196