Force feedback is noticeably different for linear versus nonlinear elastic tissue models

Proceedings - Second Joint EuroHaptics Conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, World Haptics 2007

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 519-524

  Misra, Sarthak ^a   Okamura, Allison M ^a   Ramesh, K T ^a  

^a Johns Hopkins University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL ORGANS; COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; FORCE CONTROL; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; TISSUE; VISCOELASTICITY;

FORCE DIRECTION; SURGICAL SIMULATORS; TOOL TISSUE INTERACTION;

SURGICAL EQUIPMENT;

EID: 34548136128     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/WHC.2007.55     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. M. Bro-Nielsen. Finite element modeling in surgery Simulation. Proc. IEEE, 86(3):490-503, 1998.
2. E. Dehghan and S. E. Salcudean. Comparison of linear and mon-linear models in 2d needle insertion simulation. In Computational Biomechanics for Medicine:9th MICCAI Conf. Workshop, Oct. 2006.
3. S. P. DiMaio and S. E. Salcudean. Interactive simulation of needle insertion models. IEEE Trans. Biomedical Engineering, 52(7):1167-1179, 2005.
4. Y.C.Fung. Biomechanics: mechanical properties of living tissues. Springer-Verlag Inc., New York, USA, second edition, 1993.
5. S. F. Gibson and B. Mirtich. A survey of deformable modeling in computer graphics. Tech. Report TR-97-19, Mitsubishi Electric Information Technology Center America, Nov. 1997.
6. M. E. Gurtin. An introduction to continuum mechanics. Academic Press, London, UK, first edition, 2003.
7. T. Hu and J. P. Desai. Characterization of soft-tissue material properties: large deformation analysis. In S. Cotin and D. N. Metaxas, editors, Proc. Medical Simulation: Int'l Symp., volume 3078 of Lecture Notes in Comp. Science, pages 28-37. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, 2004.
8. D. James and D. K. Pai. A unified treatment of elastostatic contact simulation for real time haptics. Haptics-e, 2(1):1-13, 2001.
9. H.-W. Nienhuys and F. A. van der Stappen. A computational technique for interactive needle insertions in 3d nonlinear material. In Proc. IEEE Int'l. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, pages 2061-2067, May 2004.
10. M. A. Srinivasan and J.-S. Chen. Human performance in controlling normal forces of contact with rigid objects. In Proc. ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Division, pages 119-125, Nov.-Dec. 1993.
11. Barbagli et al. Haptic discrimination of force direction and the influence of visual information. ACM Trans. Applied Perception, 3(2):125-135, 2006.
12. Basdogan et al. Virtual environments for medical training: Graphical and haptic simulation of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatronics, 6(3):269-285, 2001.
13. Carter et al. Measurements and modelling of the compliance of human and porcine organs. Medical Image Analysis, 5(4):213-236, 2001.
14. Cotin et al. Real-time elastic deformations of soft tissues for surgery simulation. IEEE Trans. Visualization and Computer Graphics, 5(1):62-73, 1999.
15. Delingette et al. A craniofacial surgery simulation testbed. In Proc. 3rd Int'l. Conf. on Visualization in Biomedical Computing, pages 607-618, Oct. 1994.
16. E. Molinari et al. Simulation of the biomechanical behavior of the skin in virtual surgical applications by finite element method. IEEE Trans. Biomedical Engineering, 52(9):1514-1521, 2005.
17. Kerdok et al. Truth cube: Establishing physical standards for soft tissue simulation. Medical Image Analysis, 7(3):283-291, 2003.
18. Kühnapfel et al. Endoscopic surgery training using virtual reality and deformable tissue simulation. Computers and Graphics, 24(5):671-682, 2000.
19. Picinbono et al. Anisotropic elasticity and force extrapolation to improve realism of surgery simulation. In Proc. IEEE Int'l. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, pages 596-602, Apr. 2000.
20. Picinbono et al. Non-linear anisotropic elasticity for real-time surgery simulation. Graphical Models, 65(5):305-321, 2003.
21. Rheometerics Solids Analyzer RSAII Owner's Manual. Tech. Report 902-00013A, Rheometrics Inc., Dec. 1991.
22. Sedef et al. Visual and haptic simulation of linear viscoelastic tissue behaviour based on experimental data. In Proc. 14th Symp. on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environments and Teleoperator Systems, pages 201-208, Mar. 2006.
23. Sundaraj et al. A fast method to simulate virtual deformable objects with force feedback. In 7th Int'l Conf. on Automation, Robotics, Control, and Vision, pages 413-418, Dec. 2002.
24. Székely et al. Virtual reality-based simulation of endoscopic surgery. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 9(3):310-333, 2000.
25. W. Wu and P. A. Heng. An improved scheme of an interactive finite element model for 3d soft-tissue cutting and deformation. The Visual Computer, 21(8-10):707-716, 2005.
26. H. Yamada. Strength of biological materials. The Williams & Wilkins Company, Baltimore, USA, first edition, 1970.