Effect of bone density on vertebral strength and stiffness after percutaneous vertebroplasty

Spine

Volumn 32, Issue 18, 2007, Pages

  Graham, Jove ^a,c   Ahn, Chul ^a   Hai, Nabila ^a   Buch, Barbara D ^b  

^a CENTER FOR DEVICES AND RADIOLOGICAL HEALTH   (United States)

^b George Washington University   (United States)

^c GEISINGER MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Bone density; Osteoporosis; Vertebral compression fractures; Vertebroplasty

Indexed keywords

CEMENT; POLY(METHYL METHACRYLATE);

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BONE DENSITY; BONE STRENGTH; CADAVER; COMPRESSION FRACTURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE SIMULATION; DUAL ENERGY X RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY; EX VIVO STUDY; FEMALE; FRACTURE REDUCTION; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; OSTEOPOROSIS; PERCUTANEOUS VERTEBROPLASTY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RIGIDITY; VERTEBRA BODY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOMECHANICS; BONE DENSITY; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; FEMALE; FRACTURES, COMPRESSION; HUMANS; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MIDDLE AGED; SPINAL FUSION; THORACIC VERTEBRAE;

EID: 34548134548     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318133fc73     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Riggs B, Melton L. Involutional osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 1986;314: 1676-86.
2. Linville D. Osteoporotic fractures. South Med J 2002;95:588-92.
3. Eck J, Hodges S, Humphreys S. Vertebroplasty: a new treatment strategy for osteoporotic compression fractures. Am J Orthop 2002;31:123-7.
4. Leeson M, Lippitt S. Thermal aspects of the use of polymethylmethacrylate in large metaphyseal defects in bone: a clinical review and laboratory study. Clin Orthop 1993;295:239-45.
5. Belkoff S, Molloy S. Temperature measurement during polymerization of polymethylmethacrylate cement used for vertebroplasty. Spine 2003;28: 1555-9.
6. Einhorn T. Vertebroplasty, an opportunity to do something really good for patients. Spine 2000;25:1051-2.
7. Cortet B, Cotton A, Boutry N, et al. Percutaneous vertebroplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: an open prospective study. J Rheumatol 1999;26:2222-8.
8. Gaughen J, Jensen M, Schwickert P, et al. Relevance of antecedent venography in percutaneous vertebroplasty for the treatment of osteoporotic compression fractures. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:594-600.
9. Phillips F, Wetzel F, Lieberman I, et al. An in vivo comparison of the potential for extravertebral cement leak after vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty. Spine 2002;27:2173-9.
10. Padovani B, Kasriel O, Brunner P, et al. Pulmonary embolism caused by acrylic cement: a rare complication of percutaneous vertebroplasty. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999;20:375-7.
11. Ryu K, Park C, Kim M, et al. Dose-dependent epidural leakage of polymethylmethacrylate after percutaneous vertebroplasty in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. J Neurosurg 2002;96 (suppl 1):56-61.
12. Grados F, Depriester C, Cayrolle G, et al. Long-term observations of vertebral osteoporotic fractures treated by percutaneous vertebroplasty. Rheumatology (Oxf) 2000;39:1410-4.
13. Fourney D, Schomer D, Nader R, et al. Percutaneous vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty for painful vertebral body fractures in cancer patients. J Neurosurg 2003;98:21-30.
14. Uppin A, Hirsch J, Centenera L, et al. Occurrence of new vertebral body fracture after percutaneous vertebroplasty in patients with osteoporosis. Radiology 2003;226:119-24.
15. Barr J, Barr M, Lemley T, et al. Percutaneous vertebroplasty for pain relief and spinal stabilization. Spine 2000;25:923-8.
16. Lane J, Johnson C, Khan S, et al. Minimally invasive options for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Orthop Clin North Am 2002;33:431-8.
17. Lentner M, Bishop T. Experimental Design and Analysis. Blacksburg: Valley; 1986.
18. Milliken G, Johnson D. Analysis of Messy Data, vol. I. Designed Experiments. New York: Chapman & Hall; 1992.
19. Murphy K, Lin D. Vertebroplasty: a simple solution to a difficult problem. J Clin Densitom 2001;4:189-97.
20. Littell R, Milliken G, Stroup W, et al. SAS System for Mixed Models. Cary, NC: SAS Institute; 1996.
21. Vonesh E, Chinchilli V, Pu K. Goodness-of-fit generalized nonlinear mixed-effect models. Biometrics 1996;52:572-87.
22. Belkoff S, Mathis J, Fenton D, et al. An ex vivo biomechanical evaluation of an inflatable bone tamp used in the treatment of compression fracture. Spine 2001;26:151-6.
23. Belkoff S, Mathis J, Jasper L, et al. An ex vivo biomechanical evaluation of a hydroxyapatite cement for use with vertebroplasty. Spine 2001;26:1542-6.
24. Molloy S, Mathis J, Belkoff S. The effect of vertebral body percentage fill on mechanical behavior during percutaneous vertebroplasty. Spine 2003;28: 1549-54.
25. Tohmeh A, Mathis J, Fenton D, et al. Biomechanical efficacy of unipedicular versus bipedicular vertebroplasty for the management of osteoporotic compression fractures. Spine 1999;24:1772-6.
26. Rao R, Singrakhia M. Painful osteoporotic vertebral fracture: pathogenesis, evaluation and roles of vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty in its management. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003;85:2010-22.
27. Ismail A, Cooper C, Felsenberg D, et al. Number and type of vertebral deformities: epidemiological characteristics and relation to back pain and height loss: European Vertebral Osteoporosis Study Group. Osteoporos Int 1999;9:206-13.
28. Denis F. The three column spine and its significance in the classification of acute thoracolumbar spinal injuries. Spine 1983;8:817-31.
29. Kettler A, Schmoelz W, Shezifi Y, et al. Biomechanical performance of the new BeadEx implant in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral body compression fractures: restoration and maintenance of height and stability. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2006;21:676-82.
30. Wilson D, Myers E, Mathis J, et al. Effect of augmentation on the mechanics of vertebral wedge fractures. Spine 2000;25:158-65.
31. Buckley J. Non-invasive strength assessment of human thoracolumbar vertebrae [Mechanical Engineering Ph.D. thesis]. Berkeley, CA: University of California at Berkeley; 2006.
32. Higgins K, Harten R, Langrana N, et al. Biomechanical effects of unipedicular vertebroplasty on intact vertebrae. Spine 2003;28:1540-8.
33. Berlemann U, Ferguson S, Nolte L-P, et al. Adjacent vertebral failure after vertebroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2002;84:748-52.
34. Belkoff S, Mathis J, Jasper L, et al. The biomechanics of vertebroplasty: the effect of cement volume on mechanical behavior. Spine 2001;26:1537-41.
35. Ananthakrishnan D, Berven S, Deviren V, et al. The effect on anterior column loading due to different vertebral augmentation techniques. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2005;20:25-31.
36. Villarraga M, Bellezza A, Harrigan T, et al. The biomechanical effects of kyphoplasty on adjacent non-treated vertebral bodies: a finite element analysis. Trans 50th Annual Meeting of ORS. San Francisco, 2004.
37. Baroud G, Nemes J, Heini P, et al. Load shift of the intervertebral disc after a vertebroplasty: a finite-element study. Eur Spine J 2003;12:421-6.
38. Garfin S, Yuan H, Reiley M. New technologies in spine: kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty for the treatment of painful osteoporotic compression fractures. Spine 2001;27:1511-5.
39. Deramond H, Depriester C, Galibert P, et al. Percutaneous vertebroplasty with polymethylmethacrylate: technique, indications and results. Radiol Clin North Am 1998;36:533-46.