Cervical spine segmental vertebral motion in healthy volunteers feigning restriction of neck flexion and extension

International Journal of Legal Medicine

Volumn 121, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 337-340

  Puglisi, Filadelfio ^a   Strimpakos, Nikolaos ^b,c   Papathanasiou, Matthildi ^d   Kapreli, Eleni ^c   Bonelli, Aurelio ^e   Sgambetterra, Sergio ^f   Ferrari, Robert ^g  

^a Istituto di Analisi Della Postura (Posture Analysis Institute)   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^c TEI Lamias ^*  (Greece)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

^e UNIVERSITY OF FLORENCE   (Italy)

^f Fondiaria SAI   (Italy)

^g UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Cervical vertebra; Neck pain; Range of motion; Whiplash injuries; X ray

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CERVICAL SPINE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; JOINT MOBILITY; JOINT STIFFNESS; MALE; NECK PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANGE OF MOTION; SIMULATION; SPINE MOBILITY; VOLUNTARY MOVEMENT; X RAY ANALYSIS;

ADULT; CERVICAL VERTEBRAE; FACTITIOUS DISORDERS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOVEMENT; NECK; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; WHIPLASH INJURIES;

EID: 34548133121     PISSN: 09379827     EISSN: 14371596     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00414-006-0111-0     Document Type: Article

References (4)

1. Puglisi F, Ridi R, Cecchi F, Bonelli A, Ferrari R (2004) Segmental vertebral motion in the assessment of neck range of motion in whiplash patients. Int J Legal Med 118:235-239
2. Spitzer WO, Skovron ML, Salmi LR, Cassidy JD, Duranceau J, Suissa S, Zeiss E (1995) Scientific monograph of the Quebec Task Force on whiplash-associated disorders. Spine 20[Suppl 8]:1S-73S
3. Dvir Z, Penso-Zabludowski E (2003) The effects of protocol and test situation on maximal vs. submaximal cervical motion: medicolegal implications. Int J Legal Med 117:350-355
4. Kwan O, Friel J (2002) Whiplash sine whiplash. Int J Legal Med 116:249-250