Texture gradients and perceptual constancy under haptic exploration

Proceedings - Second Joint EuroHaptics Conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, World Haptics 2007

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 66-71

  Hughes, Barry ^a   Wang, Jin ^b   Rosic, Daryan ^a   Palmer, Katie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

^b ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA REDUCTION; HAPTIC INTERFACES; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; TEXTURES;

SPATIAL DENSITY GRADIENTS; TEXTURE GRADIENTS;

SENSORY PERCEPTION;

EID: 34548118759     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/WHC.2007.109     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Lederman SJ, Klatzky RL (1996). Action for perception: manual exploratory movements for haptically processing objects and their features. In A Wing, P Haggard & R Flanagan (eds.), Hand and Brain: The Neurophysiology and Psychology of Hand Movements. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 431-446.
2. Lederman SJ. (1983) Tactual roughness perception: Spatial and temporal determinants. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 37(4): 498-511.
3. Connor CE, Hsiao SS, Phillips JR, Johnson KO (1990). Tactile roughness: Neural codes that account for psycho- physical magnitude estimates. Journal of Neuroscience, 19(2): 3823-3836.
4. Caseio JC, Sathian K (2001) Temporal cues contribute to tactile perception of roughness. Journal of Neuroscience, 21(14): 5289-5296.
5. Hughes B, Jansson G. (1994). Texture perception via active touch. Human Movement Science, 13: 301-333.
6. Mefta EM, Belingard L, Chapman CE (2000). Relative effects of the spatial and temporal characteristics of scanned surfaces on human perception of tactile roughness using passive touch. Experimental Brain Research, 132:351-361.
7. Hsiao SS, Johnson KO, Twombly IA (1993). Roughness coding in the somatosensory system. Acta Psychologica, 84: 53-67.
8. Johnson KO, Hsiao SS, Twombly, IA (1995). Neural mechanisms of tactile form recognition. In MS Gazzaniga (ed.) The Cognitive Neurosciences. MIT Press, Cambridge MA. 1995: 253-267.
9. Bensmaia SJ, Craig JC, Johnson KO (2006).Temporal factors in tactile spatial acuity: evidence for RA interference in fine spatial processing. Journal of Neurophysiology, 95, 1783-1791.
10. Hughes B (2006). Procedural knowledge and the haptic exploration and perception of textures. Haptics-e, 4(2), 1-15.
11. Holmes E, Hughes B, Jansson G (1998) Haptic perception of texture gradients. Perception, 27: 993-1008.
12. Dijkerman HC, de Haan EHF (in press). Somatosensory processes subserving perception and action. Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
13. Wang J & Hughes B (2005). Effect of density gradients on haptic discrimination. Acta Psychologica Sínica, 2005, 37, 739-747.
14. Kluger AN, DeNisi A (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: historical review, a meta-analysis and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 254-284.
15. Withagen R, Michaels CF (2005). The role of feedback information for calibration and attunement in perceiving length by dynamic touch. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 1379-1390.
16. Sathian K Zangaladze A (1997). Tactile learning is task specific but transfers between fingers. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 119-128.
17. Tsodyks M, Gilbert C (2004). Neuronal networks and perceptual learning. Nature, 431, 755-781.