Structured decision making in juvenile justice: Judges' and probation officers' perceptions and use

Children and Youth Services Review

Volumn 29, Issue 10, 2007, Pages 1335-1351

  Shook, Jeffrey J ^a   Sarri, Rosemary C ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

Juvenile; Juvenile court; Juvenile justice; Structured decision making

Indexed keywords

EID: 34548118595     PISSN: 01907409     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2007.05.008     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Andrews D., Bonta J., and Wormith J.S. The recent past and near future of risk and/or needs assessment. Crime and Delinquency 52 1 (2006) 7-27
2. Barton W., and Creekmore M. New Hampshire dispositional guidelines. (1994), Division for Children, Youth & Families, State of New Hampshire
3. Barton W., and Gorsuch K. Risk assessment and classification in juvenile justice. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Criminology (1989)
4. Bonta J. Offender risk assessment: Guidelines for selection and use. Criminal Justice and Behavior 19 4 (2002) 335-379
5. Champion D.J. Measuring offender risk: A criminal justice sourcebook (1994), Greenwood Press, Westport, CT
6. Dixon J. The organizational context of sentencing. American Journal of Sociology 10 5 (1995) 1157-1198
7. Erth J., and Healy T. Cook county juvenile female offenders risk assessment (2000), National Council on Crime and Delinquency, Chicago
8. Feld B.C. Badkids: Race and the transformation of the juvenile court (1999), Oxford University Press, New York
9. Gambrill E., and Shlonsky A. Risk assessment in context. Children and Youth Services Review 22 11/12 (2000) 813-839
10. Glueck S., and Glueck E. Delinquents and nondelinquents in perspective (1956), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
11. Gottfredson D., and Moriarity L. Statistical risk assessment: Old problems and new applications. Crime and Delinquency 52 1 (2006) 178-199
12. Gottfredson D., and Snyder H. The mathematics of risk classification: Changing data into valid instruments for juvenile courts (2005), U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, Washington, DC
13. Grisso T. Why we need mental health screening and assessment in juvenile justice programs. In: Grisso T., Vincent G., and Seagrave D. (Eds). Mental health screening and assessment in juvenile justice (2005), The Guilford Press, New York 3-21
14. Hawkins J.D., Smith B.H., Hill K.G., et al. Understanding and preventing crime and violence: Findings from the Seattle Social Development Project. In: Thornberry T.P., and Krohn M.D. (Eds). Taking stock of delinquency (2005), Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York 255-312
15. Jesness C.F. The Jesness Inventory Classification System. Criminal Justice and Behavior 15 1 (1998) 78-91
16. Jesness C.F., Bohnstedt M., and Molof M. Sequential I-Level Classification (1973), American Justice Institute, Sacramento, CA
17. Keller K. Abuse/neglect and delinquency: Dually involved minors in the juvenile court. Paper presented at the American Society of Criminology, Chicago, IL (2002)
18. Krisberg B., Onek D., Jones M., and Schwartz I. Juveniles in state custody: prospects for community-based care for troubled adolescents. (1993), National Council on Crime and Delinquency, San Francisco
19. Loeber R., and Farrington D. Serious and violent juvenile offenders: Risk factors and successful interventions (1998), Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
20. Lowenkamp C., LaTessa E., and Holsinger A. The risk principle in action: What have we learned from 13,676 offenders and 97 correctional programs. Crime & Delinquency 52 1 (2006) 77-93
21. Miller A., and Ohlin L. Delinquency and community: Creating opportunities and controls (1985), Sage, Beverly Hills
22. Miller J. Last one over the wall: The Massachusetts experiment in closing reform schools (1991), Ohio State University Press, Columbus, OH
23. Sarri R., and Hasenfeld Y. Brought to justice? Juveniles, the courts, and the law (1976), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
24. Sarri R., Shook J., Ward G., et al. Decision making in the juvenile justice system (2001), University of Michigan, Institute for Social Research, Ann Arbor, MI
25. Schlossman S. Delinquent children: The juvenile reform school. In: Morris N., and Rothman D. (Eds). The Oxford history of the prison (1995), Oxford University Press, New York 363-390
26. Snyder H.N. Juvenile arrests 2004 (2006), U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Special Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, Washington, D.C.
27. Taxman F., and Thanner M. Risk, need and responsivity (RNR): It all depends. Crime and Delinquency 52 1 (2006) 28-51
28. Tanenhaus D. The evolution of juvenile courts in the twentieth century: Beyond the myth of immaculate construction. In: Rosenheim M., Zimring F., Tanenhaus D., and Dohrn B. (Eds). A century of juvenile justice (2002), University of Chicago Press, Chicago 42-73
29. Towberman D.B. A national survey of juvenile risk assessment. Juvenile & Family Court Journal 43 1 (1992) 61-67
30. Warren M. The case for differential treatment of delinquents. In: Voss H.L. (Ed). Society, delinquency and delinquent behavior (1970), Little Brown Co, Boston 419-428
31. Zimring F. Penal proportionality for the young offender: Notes on immaturity, capacity and diminished responsibility. In: Grisso T., and Schwartz R. (Eds). Youth on trial: A developmental perspective on juvenile justice (2000), University of Chicago Press, Chicago 271-290