Multi-objective supply chain optimization: An industrial case study

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 4448 LNCS, Issue , 2007, Pages 732-741

  Amodeo, Lionel ^a   Chen, Haoxun ^a   El Hadji, Aboubacar ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE TECHNOLOGIE DE TROYES   (France)

Author keywords

Multi objective optimization; NSGA II; Petri Net; Simulation; Supply chain management

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; GENETIC ALGORITHMS; OPTIMIZATION; PETRI NETS; SEARCH ENGINES; STOCHASTIC CONTROL SYSTEMS;

INDUSTRIAL CASE STUDY; INVENTORY POLICIES; MULTIPLE OBJECTIVES; SUPPLY CHAIN DEMONSTRATES;

SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT;

EID: 34548083823     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-71805-5_79     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (9)

1. E.K. Burke and J.D. Landa Silva. The influence of the fitness evaluation method on the performance of multiobjective search algorithms. European Journal of Operational Research, 169(3):875-897, 2006.
2. H. Chen, L. Amodeo, F. Chu, and K. Labadi. Modelling and performance evaluation of supply chains using batch deterministic and stochastic petri nets. IEEE Transaction on Automation Science and Engineering, 2(2):132-144, 2005.
3. C.A. Coello Coello. An updated survey of ga-based multiobjective optimization techniques. ACM Computing Surveys, 32(2):109-143, 2000.
4. Y. Collette and P. Siarry. Optimisation multi-objectif. Eyrolles, 2002.
5. J.S.R. Daniel and C. Rajendran. Heuristic approaches to determine base-stock levels in a serial supply chain with a single objective and with multiple objectives. European Journal of Operational Research, 2005.
6. K. Deb, A. Pratap, S. Agarwal, and T. Meyarivan. A fast and elitist multi-objective genetic algorithm: Nsga-ii. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 6(2):182-197, 2002.
7. A. Riise. Comparing genetic algorithms and tabu search for multiobjective optimization. In Conference proceedings IFORS, Edinburgh, UK., 2002.
8. S. Tayur, R. Ganeshan, and M. Magazine. Quantitative Models for Supply Chain Management. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998.
9. E. Zitzler and L. Thiele. Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: a comparative case study and the strength pareto approach. IEEE Transactions on evolutionary computation, 3(4):257-271, 1999.