The notion of 'phonology' in dyslexia research: Cognitivism - And beyond

Dyslexia

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 154-174

  Uppstad, Per Henning ^a,b   Tønnessen, Finn Egil ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STAVANGER   (Norway)

^b LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Circularity; Connectionism; Definition; Phonological awareness; Phonological deficit; Phonology

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL FEATURE; CLINICAL RESEARCH; COGNITIVISM; DYSLEXIA; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; LANGUAGE ABILITY; LINGUISTICS; NEUROPSYCHOLOGY; PERCEPTION; PHONEME; PHONETICS; READING;

AWARENESS; COGNITION; DYSLEXIA; HUMANS; LINGUISTICS; PHONETICS; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION TESTS; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 34548082081     PISSN: 10769242     EISSN: 10990909     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/dys.332     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Aaron, P. G. (1989). Dyslexia and hyperlexia. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
2. Aslin, R. N., & Pisoni, D. B. (1980). Some developmental processes in speech perception. In G. H. Yeni-komshian, J. H. Kavanagh, & C. A. Ferguson (Eds.), Child phonology (Vol. 2: Perception). New York: Academic Press.
3. Bechtel, W., & Abrahamsen, A. (1991). Connectionism and the mind: An introduction to parallel processing in networks. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.
4. Bishop, D. V. M., & Snowling, M. (2004). Developmental dyslexia and specific language impairment: Same or different? Psychological Bulletin 130(6), 858-886.
5. Brady, S., Scarborough, H., & Shankweiler, D. (1996). A perspective on two recent research reports. Perspectives, 22, 5-8.
6. Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton.
7. Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8. Chomsky, N. (1975). Reflections on language. New York: Pantheon Books.
9. Chomsky, N., & Halle, M. (1968). The sound pattern of English. London: Harper and Row.
10. Churchland, P. S. (1986). Neurophilosophy: Toward a unified science of the mind/brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11. DSM-IV. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington DC: American Psychiatric Association.
12. Ehri, L. C. (1997). Sight word learning in normal children and dyslexics. In B. B. Blackman (Ed.), Foundations of reading acquisition and dyslexia. Implications for early intervention (pp. 163-190). London: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
13. Fitch, R. H., Tallal, P., Brown, C. P., Galaburda, A. M., & Rosen, G. D. (1994). Induced microgyria and auditory temporal processing in rats: A model for language impairment? Cerebral Cortex, 4(3), 260-270.
14. Galaburda, A. M., Menard, M. T., & Rosen, G. D. (1994). Evidence for aberrant auditory anatomy in developmental dyslexia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 91, 8010-8013.
15. Gardner, H. (1985). The mind's new science: A history of the cognitive revolution. New York: Basic Books.
16. Garfinkel, A. (1991). Reductionism. In R. Boyd, P. Gasper, & J. D. Trout (Eds.), The philosophy of science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17. Goswami, U., & Bryant, P. (1990). Phonological skills and learning to read. Hove: Erlbaum. Gumperz, J. J., & Levinson, S. C. (Eds.). (1996). Rethinking linguistic relativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. Home, M. (Ed.). (2000). Prosody: Theory and experiment: studies presented to Gösta Bruce. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
19. Hulme, C., Quinlan, P., Bolt, G., & Snowling, M. (1995). Building phonological knowledge into a connectionist model of the development of word meaning. Language and Cognitive Processes, 10, 387-391.
20. Jakobson, R., Taylor, M., & Waugh, L. R. (2002). The sound shape of language (3rd ed.). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
21. Kager, R. (1999). Optimality theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22. Kuhl, P. K. (1991). Human adults and human infants show a 'perceptual magnet effect' for the prototypes of speech categories, monkeys do not. Perception and Psychophysics, 50, 93-107.
23. Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd enlarged ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
24. Liberman, A. M. (1997). How theories of speech affect research in reading and writing. In B. A. Blachman (Ed.), Foundations of reading acquisition and dyslexia: Implications for early intervention. Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.
25. Liberman, A. M. (1999). The reading researcher and the reading teacher need the right theory of speech. Scientific studies of reading: The official journal of the Society for the Scientific Study of Reading, 3(2), 95-113.
26. Liberman, I. Y., Shankweiler, D., & Liberman, A. M. (1989). The alphabetic principle and learning to read. In D. Shankweiler, & I. Y. Liberman (Eds.), Phonology and reading disability: Solving the reading puzzle. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
27. Linell, P. (1982). The written language bias in linguistics. Linköping: Universitetet.
28. Livingstone, M. S., Rosen, G. D., Drislane, F. W., & Galaburda, A. M. (1991). Physiological and anatomical evidence for a magnocellular defect in developmental dyslexia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 88, 7943-7947.
29. Lyon, G. R. (Ed.). (1994). Frames of reference for the assessment of learning disabilities: New views on measurement issues. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
30. Mann, V. A., & Liberman, A. M. (1983). Some differences between phonetic and auditory modes of perception. Cognition, 14, 211-235.
31. Matthews, P. H. (1993). Grammatical theory in the United States from Bloomfield to Chomsky. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32. Mattingly, I. G., & Liberman, A. M. (1990). Speech and other auditory modules. In G. M. Edelman, W. E. Gall, & W. M. Cowan (Eds.), Signal and sense: Local and global order in perceptual maps. New York: Wiley.
33. Mattingly, I. G., Liberman, A. M., Syrdal, A. K., & Halwes, T. (1971). Discrimination in speech and non-speech modes. Cognitive Psychology, 2, 419-430.
34. Merzenich, M. M., Jenkins, W. M., Johnston, P., Schreiner, C., Miller, S. L., & Tallal, P. (1996). Temporal processing deficits of language-learning impaired children ameliorated by training. Science, 271, 77-81.
35. Miles, T. R., & Miles, E. (1990). Dyslexia: A hundred years on. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
36. Miller, S., & Tallal, P. (1996). Acoustically modified speech training studies: Implications for dyslexia? Perspectives, 22(3), 8-9.
37. Mody, M., Studdert-Kennedy, M., & Brady, S. (1997). Speech perception deficits in poor readers: Auditory processing or phonological coding? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 64, 199-231.
38. Nicolson, R. I. (2002). The dyslexia ecosystem. Dyslexia: An International Journal of Research and Practice, 8, 55-66.
39. Öhman, S. (1979). Introduction: Gunnar Fant, pioneer student of human speech. In S. Öhman, & B. Lindblom (Eds.), Frontiers of speech communication research (pp. xv-xxv). London, New York, San Francisco: Academic Press.
40. Popper, K. R. (1965). Conjectures and Refutations: The growth of scientific knowledge (2nd ed.). New York: Harper and Row.
41. Popper, K. R., & Eccles, J. C. (1977). The self and its brain. Berlin: Springer International.
42. Rack, J. P., Snowling, M. J., & Olson, R. K. (1992). The nonword reading deficit in developmental dyslexia: A review. Reading Research Quarterly, 27, 28-53.
43. Rosch, E. (1973). On the internal structure of perceptual and semantic categories. In T. E. Moore (Ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language. New York: Academic Press.
44. Scarborough, H. S. (1990). Very early language deficits in dyslexic children. Child Development, 61, 1728-1743.
45. Shankweiler, D., & Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1967). Identification of consonants and vowels presented to left and right ears. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 19, 59-63.
46. Stanovich, K. E., & Siegel, L. S. (1994). Phenotypic performance profile of children with reading disabilities: A regression-based test of the phonological-core variable-difference model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 24-53.
47. Snowling, M., & Hulme, C. (1999). A connectionist perspective on reading and its difficulties. In I. Lundberg, F. E. Tønnessen, & I. Austad (Eds.), Dyslexia: Advances in theory and practice (pp. 45-58). Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
48. Studdert-Kennedy, M., & Mody, M. (1995). Auditory temporal perception deficits in the reading-impaired: A critical review of the evidence. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2(4), 508-514.
49. Studdert-Kennedy, M., & Shankweiler, D. (1970). Hemispheric specialization for speech perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 48, 579-594.
50. Tallal, P. (1984). Temporal or phonetic processing deficit in dyslexia? That is the question. Applied Psycholinguistics, 5, 167-169.
51. Tallal, P., Miller, S., & Fitch, R. H. (1993). Neurobiological basis of speech: A case for the preeminence of temporal processing. In P. Tallal, A. M. Galaburda, R. R. Llinas, & C. von Euler (Eds.), Temporal information processing in the nervous system. New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
52. Tallal, P., Miller, S. L., Bedi, G., Byma, G., Wang, X., Nagarajan, S. S., Schreiner, C., Jenkins, W. M., & Merzenich, M. M. (1996). Language comprehension in language-learning impaired children improved with acoustically modified speech. Science, 271, 81-84.
53. Tallal, P., & Piercy, M. (1973). Developmental aphasia: Impaired rate of nonverbal processing as a function of sensory modality. Neuropsychologia, 11, 389-398.
54. Tallal, P., & Piercy, M. (1974). Developmental aphasia: Rate of auditory processing and selective impairment of consonant perception. Neuropsychologia, 12, 83-93.
55. Taylor, J. R. (1991). Linguistic categorization: Prototypes in linguistic theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
56. Tønnessen, F. E. (1995). On defining 'dyslexia'. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 39(2), 20.
57. Tønnessen, F. E. (1997). How can we best define 'Dyslexia'? Dyslexia, 3, 78-92.
58. Tønnessen, F. E. (1999a). Awareness and automaticity in reading. In I. Lundberg, F.E. Tønnessen, & I. Austad (Eds.), Dyslexia: Advances in theory and practice (pp. 91-99). Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
59. Tønnessen, F. E. (1999b). Options and limitations of the cognitive psychological approach to the treatment of dyslexia. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32(5), 386-393.
60. Tooley, M. (1993). Causation: Reductionism versus realism. In E. Sosa, & M. Tooley (Eds.), Causation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
61. Uppstad, P. H. (2005). Language and literacy: Some fundamental issues in research on reading and writing. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Department of Linguistics and Phonetics, Lund University, Lund.
62. Uppstad, P. H. (2006a). Written language skills and the notion of 'lexicon'. L1 Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 6(1). Retrieved December 20, 2005, from http://11.publication-archive.com/start
63. Uppstad, P. H. (2006b). The dynamics of written language aquisition. L1 Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 6(1). Retrieved December 20, 2005, from http://11.publication-archive.com/start
64. Uppstad, P. H., & Tønnessen, F. E. (2005). The status of the concept of 'phoneme' in psycholinguistics. In P. H. Uppstad, Language and literacy: Some fundamental issues in research on reading and writing. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Department of Linguistics and Phonetics, Lund University, Lund.
65. Vellutino, F. R. (1979). Dyslexia: theory and research. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
66. Vellutino, F. R., Fletcher, J. M., Snowling, M. J., & Scanlon, D. M. (2004). Specific reading disability (dyslexia): What have we learned in the past four decades? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45(1), 2-40.
67. Wengelin, Å. (2002). Text production in adults with reading and writing difficulties. Gothenburg Monographs in Linguistics 20. Gothenburg: Departmental of Linguistics, Göteborg University.