Strain rate effects in phenolic composites and phenolic-impregnated honeycomb structures

Composites Science and Technology

Volumn 67, Issue 13, 2007, Pages 2827-2837

  Heimbs, Sebastian ^a   Schmeer, Sebastian ^b   Middendorf, Peter ^a   Maier, Martin ^b  

^a AIRBUS GROUP INNOVATIONS   (Germany)

^b INSTITUT FÜR VERBUNDWERKSTOFFE GMBH   (Germany)

Author keywords

A. Structural materials; B. Impact behaviour; B. Mechanical properties; B. Stress strain curves; Honeycomb

Indexed keywords

COMPOSITE MATERIALS; GLASS FIBER REINFORCED PLASTICS; PHENOLIC RESINS; STRAIN; STRAIN RATE; STRESSES;

IMPACT BEHAVIOUR; PHENOLIC COMPOSITES; PHENOLIC-IMPREGNATED HONEYCOMB STRUCTURES; STRAIN RATE EFFECTS;

HONEYCOMB STRUCTURES;

ARAMID; BUILDING MATERIAL; COMPRESSION; FIBER REINFORCED COMPOSITE; GLASS FIBER; IMPACT; LOADING (TESTING); MECHANICAL PROPERTY; SHEAR PROPERTY; STRAIN; STRESS-STRAIN PROPERTY; TENSION; WOVEN FABRIC;

EID: 34548079561     PISSN: 02663538     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.01.027     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Gardziella A., Pilato L.A., and Knop A. Phenolic resins. 2nd ed. (2000), Springer
2. Hunter J., and Forsdyke K.L. Phenolic GRP and its recent applications. Polym Compos 10 2 (1989) 169-185
3. Nyden MR, Brown JE, Lomakin SM. Flammability properties of honeycomb composites and phenol-formaldehyde resins. In Fire and polymers II: materials and tests for hazard prevention, ACS symposium series 599, Washington, DC, (USA); August 21-26th 1994. p. 245-55.
4. Willson P. An update on phenolic resins for use in mass transport, marine, off shore and construction applications. Composites in Fire 3, Centre for Composite Materials Engineering, University of Newcastle, UK; September 9-10th 2003.
5. Sarath Chandra D., and Laramee R.C. Glass/phenolic composites: properties and fracture features. In: Cheremisinoff N.P., and Cheremisinoff P.N. (Eds). Handbook of advanced materials testing (1995), Marcel Dekker, Inc. 933-969
6. Redjel B. Mechanical properties and fracture toughness of phenolic resin. Plast Rub Compos Pro 24 (1995) 221-228
7. Charalambides M.N., and Williams J.G. Fracture toughness characterization of phenolic resin and its composite. Polym Compos 16 1 (1995) 17-28
8. St John N.A., and Brown J.R. Flexural and interlaminar shear properties of glass-reinforced phenolic composites. Compos Part A 29 (1998) 939-946
9. Morii T, Ivens J, Verpoest I. Influence of sizing and resin on the mechanical properties of unidirectional glass/phenolic composite. In: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on composite interfaces (ICCI-VII), Fujisawa, (Japan); May 10-13th 1998. p. 202-03.
10. Morii T, Ivens J, Verpoest I. Interfacial effect on the mechanical properties of glass/phenolic composite. In: Proceedings of the 12th international conference on composite materials (ICCM-12), Paris, (France); July 5-9th 1999.
11. Tavakoli S.M., Palfrey R.A., and Phillips M.G. Compatibility of commercial chopped-strand mats with a phenolic resin system for hand laminating. Composites 20 2 (1989) 159-165
12. Barré S., Chotard T., and Benzeggagh M.L. Comparative study of strain rate effects on mechanical properties of glass fibre-reinforced thermoset matrix composites. Compos Part A 27 (1996) 1169-1181
13. Maji A.K., Satpathi D., and Donald S. Mechanical properties of aluminium honeycomb impact limiters. RAMTRANS 3 2-3 (1992) 109-119
14. Koploy MA, Taylor CS. GA-4/GA-9 Honeycomb impact limiter tests and analytical model. High Level Radioactive Waste Management. In: Proceedings of the 2nd annual international conference, Las Vegas, (NV, USA); 1991. p. 1264-70.
15. McFarland RK. The development of metal honeycomb energy absorbing elements. JPL Report TR 32-639; July 1964.
16. Bandak M, Bitzer T. Honeycomb, a lightweight energy absorbing material. In: 22nd international SAMPE technical conference; November 6-8th 1990. p. 1250-63.
17. Shkolnikov MB. Honeycomb modeling for side impact moving deformable barrier. In: Proceedings of the 7th international LS-DYNA users conference, Dearborn, (MI, USA); May 20-21th 2002.
18. Kirk J.A. Mechanical energy absorbers and aluminium honeycomb. J Mech Des 104 (1982) 671-674
19. Wu E., and Jiang W.S. Axial crush of metallic honeycombs. Int J Impact Eng 19 5-6 (1997) 439-456
20. Zhao H., and Gary G. Crushing behaviour of aluminium honeycombs under impact loading. Int J Impact Eng 21 10 (1998) 827-836
21. Baker W.E., Togami T.C., and Weydert J.C. Static and dynamic properties of high-density metal honeycombs. Int J Impact Eng 21 3 (1998) 149-163
22. Goldsmith W, Sackman JL. Energy absorption by sandwich plates: a topic in crashworthiness. Crashworthiness and occupant protection in transportation systems, ASME, vol. 126; 1991. p. 1-30.
23. Goldsmith W., and Sackman J.L. An experimental study of energy absorption in impact on sandwich plates. Int J Impact Eng 12 2 (1992) 241-262
24. Aitken R. Damage due to soft body impact on composite sandwich aircraft panels. PhD Thesis, University of Auckland, Department of Mechanical Engineering; 2000.
25. Heimbs S, Middendorf P, Maier M. Honeycomb sandwich material modeling for dynamic simulations of aircraft interior components. In: Proceedings of the 9th International LS-DYNA Users Conference, Dearborn, MI, (USA); June 4-6th 2006.
26. Gibson L.J., and Ashby M.F. Cellular solids: structure and properties. 2nd ed. (1997), Cambridge University Press
27. Gotoh M., Yamashita M., and Kawakita A. Crush behavior of honeycomb structure impacted by drop-hammer and its numerical analysis. Mater Sci Res Int 2 4 (1996) 261-266
28. Stronge W.J. Dynamic crushing of elastoplastic cellular solids. In: Jono M., and Inoue T. (Eds). Mechanical behaviour of materials VI (ICM6) vol. 1 (1991), Pergamon Press, Oxford 377-382
29. Hönig A., and Stronge W.J. In-plane dynamic crushing of honeycomb. Int J Mech Sci 44 (2002) 1665-1714
30. Papka SD. In-plane uniaxial and biaxial crushing of a polycarbonate honeycomb. PhD Thesis, University of Texas at Austin, Department of Aerospace Engineering and Engineering Mechanics; 1998.
31. Bitzer T. Useful analysis methods for sandwich structures. In: 39th international SAMPE symposium, Anaheim, CA, (USA); April 11-14th 1994. p. 419-25.
32. Shkolnikov MB. Strain rates in crashworthiness. In: Proceedings of the 8th International LS-DYNA users conference, Dearborn, MI, USA; 2004.
33. Welsh L.M., and Harding J. Effect of strain rate on the tensile failure of woven reinforced polyester resin composites. J Phys IV 46 8 (1985) C5.405-C5.414
34. Yuanming X., and Xing W. Constitutive equation for unidirectional composites under tensile impact. Comp Sci Tech 56 (1996) 155-160
35. Behler FJ, Wulf A. Effect of high loading rates on the mechanical properties and damage evolution of fibre reinforced plastics. In: Bunsell AR et al., editors. Developments in the science and technology of composite materials, Proceedings of the 5th European conference on composite materials, Bordeaux, France; 1992. p. 123-28.
36. Sierakowski R.L. Strain rate effects in composites. Appl Mech Rev 50 12 (1997) 741-761
37. Xia Y., Yuan J., and Yang B. A statistical model and experimental study of the strain-rate dependence of the strength of fibres. Comp Sci Tech 52 (1994) 499-504
38. Rotem A, Lifshitz JM. Longitudinal strength of unidirectional fibrous composite under high rate of loading. Proceedings of the 26th annual technical conference, Society of the Plastics Industry, Reinforced Plastics/Composites Division, Washington (DC); 1971. p. 1-10 [Section 10-G].
39. Grimes G.C. The adhesive-honeycomb relationship. Appl Polym Symp 3 (1966) 157-190
40. Anderson TA. Lightweight composite structures. Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, University of Washington; 2003.
41. Reid S.R., Reddy T.Y., and Peng C. Dynamic compression of cellular structures and materials. In: Jones N., and Wierzbicki T. (Eds). Structural crashworthiness and failure (1993), Elsevier, Amsterdam 295-340
42. Kobayashi H., Daimaruya M., and Takaya Y. Dynamic and quasi-static deformation of aluminium honeycomb sandwich panel in three point bending. J Phys IV 110 (2003) 705-710
43. Harrigan J.J., Reid S.R., and Peng C. Inertia effects in impact energy absorbing materials and structures. Int J Impact Eng 22 (1999) 955-979
44. De Lassat de Pressigny Y. Numerical simulation of ground impact after airdrop. In: Proceedings of the 5th European LS-DYNA users conference, Birmingham, UK; May 25-26th 2005.
45. Zhou Q., and Mayer R.R. Characterization of aluminium honeycomb material failure in large deformation compression, shear, and tearing. J Eng Mater-T ASME 124 (2002) 412-420