Achieving a simple development model for 3D shapes: Are chemicals necessary?

Proceedings of GECCO 2007: Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 1013-1020

  Haddow, Pauline C ^a   Hoye, Johan ^a  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

Author keywords

3D shapes; Artificial development; Biological mechanisms; Chemicals

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; EVOLUTIONARY ALGORITHMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; SCALABILITY;

3D SHAPES; ARTIFICIAL DEVELOPMENT; BIOLOGICAL MECHANISMS;

THREE DIMENSIONAL COMPUTER GRAPHICS;

EID: 34548074200     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1276958.1277160     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. P. Bentley and S. Kumar. Three ways to grow designs: A comparison of embryogenies for an evolutionary design problem. In Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, volume 1, pages 35-43, Orlando, Florida, USA, 13-17July 1999. Morgan Kaufmann.
2. J. Bongard and R. Pfeifer. Repeated structure and dissociation of genotypic and phenotypic complexity in artificial ontogeny. In Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, pages 820-836. Morgan-Kaufmann, 2001.
3. J. Bongard and R. Pfeifer. Evolving complete agents using artificial ontogeny. In F.Hara and R. Pfeifer, editors, Morpho-functional Machines: The New Species (Designing Embodied Intelligence), pages 237-258. Springer-Verlag, 2003.
4. F. Dellaert. Toward A biologically defensible model of development. Master's thesis, Nov. 1995.
5. P. Eggenberger. Evolving morphologies of simulated 3d organisms based on differential expression, 1997.
6. D. Federici. Evolving complete agents using artificial ontogeny. In Proceedings of SAB, Simulation of Adaptive Behavior, pages 373-384, 2004.
7. e. a. G. M. Rubin. Comparative genomics of the eukaryotes. In Science, pages 2204-2215. 2000.
8. D. Goldberg, K. Deb, and B. Korb. Messy genetic algorithms: Motivation, analysis, and first results. Complex Systems, 3:493-530, 1989.
9. D. E. Goldberg, K. Deb, H. Kargupta, and G. Harik. Rapid accurate optimization of difficult problems using fast messy genetic algorithms. In S. Forrest, editor, Proc. of the Fifth Int. Conf. on Genetic Algorithms, pages 56-64, San Mateo, CA, 1993. Morgan Kaufmann.
10. G. R. Harik and D. E. Goldberg. Learning linkage. In R. K. Belew and M. D. Vose, editors, Foundations of Genetic Algorithms 4, pages 247-262. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA, 1997.
11. P. Hogeweg. Shapes in the shadow: Evolutionary dynamics of morphogenesis. In Artificial Life, volume 6, pages 85-101, 2000.
12. P. E. Hotz. Comparing direct and developmental encoding schemes in artificial evolution: A case study in evolving lens shapes. In Proc. of the 2004 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, pages 752-757, Portland, Oregon, 20-23 June 2004.
13. T. Kalganova. Bidirectional incremental evolution in extrinsic evolvable hardware. In J. Lohn, A. Stoica, and D. Keymeulen, editors, Proceedings of the Second NASA/DoD Workshop on Evolvable Hardware (EH2000), pages 65-74, Palo Alto, California, USA, 13-15 2000. IEEE.
14. S. Kumar and P. J. Bentley. Implicit evolvability: An investigation into the evolvability of an embryogeny. In Late Breaking Papers in The Second Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO 2000), 2000.
15. J. F. Miller. Evolving a self-repairing, self-regulating, french flag organism. In Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, pages 129-139, 2004.
16. J. F. Miller and W. Banzhaf. Evolving the program for a cell: from french flags to boolean circuits. In S. Kumar and P. J. Bentley, editors, On Growth, Form and Computers. Academic Press, Oct. 2003.
17. H. Muhlenbein and D. Schlierkamp-Voosen. Predictive models for the breeder genetic algorithm: I. continuous parameter optimization. Evolutionary Computation, 1(1):25-49, 1993.
18. G. T. P.C. Haddow and P. van Remortel. Shrinking the genotype: L-systems for ehw? In Proceedings of International Conference on evolvable systems: from Biology to Hardware, pages 128-139, 2001.
19. R. C. Purshouse and P. J. Fleming. An Adaptive Divide-and-Conquer Methodology for Evolutionary, Multi-criterion Optimisation. In C. M. Fonseca, P. J. Fleming, E. Zitzler, K. Deb, and L. Thiele, editors, Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization. Second International Conference, EMO 2003, pages 133-147, Faro, Portugal, April 2003. Springer. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Volume 2632.
20. J. Torresen. A divide and conquer approach to evolvable hardware. In Proc. of the Second Int. Conf. on Evolvable Systems: from Biology to Hardware (ICES98), 1998.
21. L. Wolpert. In Principles of Development. Oxford University Press, 1998.