Vegetative compatibility groups in the fungus cryptosporiopsis actinidiae

New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 67-72

  Beever, Ross E ^a   Parkes, Stephanie L ^a  

^a LANDCARE RESEARCH   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Kiwifruit storage rots; Nitrogen non utilising mutants; Sexual reproduction; Vegetative compatibility; Vegetative incompatibility

Indexed keywords

FUNGUS; PATHOGEN; SEXUAL REPRODUCTION; VINE;

ACTINIDIA; ACTINIDIA DELICIOSA; CRYPTOSPORIOPSIS ACTINIDIAE; FUNGI;

EID: 34548071140     PISSN: 01140671     EISSN: 11758783     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01140670709510169     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Anderson, JB, and Kohn, LM. 1995. Clonality in soilborne, plant pathogenic fungi. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 33:369–391.
2. Beever, RE, and Parkes, SL., 2003. Use of nitrate non-utilising (Nit) mutants to determine vegetative compatibility in Botryotinia fuckeliana (Botrytis cinerea). European Journal of Plant Pathology, 109:607–613.
3. Beever, RE, and Weeds, PL. 2004. “ Taxonomy and genetic variation of Botrytis and Botryotinia ”. In Botrytis:biology, pathology, and control, Edited by:Elad, Y, Williamson, B, Tudzynski, P, and Delen, N. 29–52. Dordrecht:Kluwer.
4. Brooker, NL, Leslie, JF, and Dickman, MB. 1991. Nitrate non-utilizing mutants of Colletotrichum and their use in studies of vegetative compatibility and genetic relatedness. Phytopathology, 81:672–677.
5. Correll, JC, and Gordon, TR. 1999. “ Population structure of ascomycetes and deuteromycetes. What we have learned from case studies ”. In Structure and dynamics of fungal populations, Edited by:Worrall, JJ. 225–250. Dordrecht:Kluwer.
6. Correll, JC, Klittich, CJR, and Leslie, JF. 1987. Nitrate nonutilizing mutants of Fusarium oxysporum and their use in vegetative compatibility tests. Phytopathology, 77:1640–1646.
7. Dugan, FM, Roberts, RG, and Grove, GG. 1993. Comparative studies of Cryptosporiopsis curvispora and C. perennans. II. Cytology and vegetative compatibility. Mycologia, 85:565–573.
8. Fullerton, RA, Rheinländer, PA, Manning, MA, and Casonato, SG. in press. Infection and rot exprerssion by Cryptosporiopsis actinidiae and Phomopsis sp. in kiwifruit, Actinidia chinesis ’Hort16A’. Acta Horticulturae
9. Glass, NL, Jacobson, DJ, and Shiu, PKT. 2000. The genetics of hyphal fusion and vegetative incompatibility in filamentous ascomycete fungi. Annual Review of Genetics, 34:165–186.
10. Johnston, PR, Manning, MA, Meier, X, Park, D, and Fullerton, RA. 2004. Cryptosporiopsis actinidiae sp. nov. Mycotaxon, 89:131–136.
11. Johnston, PR, Pennycook, SR, and Manning, MA. 2005. Taxonomy of fruit-rotting pathogens:what's really out there?. New Zealand Plant Protection, 58:42–46.
12. Leslie, JF. 1993. Fungal vegetative compatibility. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 31:127–150.
13. Malik, M, and Vilgalys, R. 1999. “ Somatic incompatibility in fungi ”. In Structure and dynamics of fungal populations, Edited by:Worrall, JJ. 123–138. Dordrecht:Kluwer.
14. Manning, MA, Meier, X, Olsen, TL, and Johnston, PR. 2003. Fungi associated with fruit rots of Actinidia chinensis ’Hort16A’ in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science, 31:315–324.
15. Parkes, SL, Beever, RE, Pak, HA, and Pennycook, SR. Use of Nit mutants to track fungi in the field. 8th International Congress of Plant Pathology. February2–72003, Christchurch, New Zealand. pp. 112 Abstracts of offered papers, No. 8.45
16. Perkins, DD. 1977. Details for preparing silica gel stocks. Neurospora Newsletter, 24:16–17.
17. Saupe, SJ. 2000. Molecular genetics of heterokaryon incompatibility in filamentous ascomycetes. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, 64:489–502.
18. Smith, H, Wingfield, MJ, De Wet, J, and Coutinho, TA. 2000. Genotypic diversity of Sphaeropsis sapinea from South Africa and Northern Sumatra. Plant Disease, 84:139–142.
19. Verkley, GJM. 1999. A monograph of the genus Pezicula and its anamorphs. Studies in Mycology, 44:1–180.
20. Vogel, HJ. 1964. Distribution of lysine pathways among fungi:evolutionary implications. The American Naturalist, 98:435–446.