Optimal antenna placement using a new multi-objective chc algorithm

Proceedings of GECCO 2007: Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 876-883

  Nebro, Antonio J ^a   Alba, Enrique ^a   Molina, Guillermo ^a   Chicano, Francisco ^a   Luna, Francisco ^a   Durillo, Juan J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MÁLAGA   (Spain)

Author keywords

CHC; Multi objective optimization; Radio network design

Indexed keywords

ANTENNAS; BASE STATIONS; CELLULAR RADIO SYSTEMS; OPTIMAL SYSTEMS; PROBLEM SOLVING;

BI-OBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION PROBLEMS; OPTIMAL ANTENNA PLACEMENT; RADIO NETWORK DESIGN (RND);

MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION;

EID: 34548070543     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1276958.1277128     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. E. Alba and F. Chicano. On the behavior of parallel genetic algorithms for optimal placement of antennae in telecommunications. International Journal of Foundations of Computer Science, 16(2):343-359, April 2005.
2. E. Alba, G. Molina, and F. Chicano. Optimal placement of antennae using metaheuristics. In Numerical Methods and Applications (NM&A-2006), Borovets, Bulgaria, August 2006.
3. C. Blum and A. Roli. Metaheuristics in combinatorial optimization: Overview and conceptual comparison. ACM Computing Surveys, 35(3):268-308, 2003.
4. P. Calégari, F. Guidée, P. Kuonen, and D. Kobler. Parallel island-based genetic algorithm for radio network design. Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing, (47):86-90, 1997.
5. Oscar Cordon, Sergio Damas, and José Santamaría. A che evolutionary algorithm for 3d image registration. In Fuzzy Sets and Systems IFSA 2003, volume 2715/2003 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 404-411. Springer Berlin / Heidelberg, 2003.
6. Kalyanmoy Deb, Amrit Pratap, Sameer Agarwal, and T. Meyarivan. A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 6(2): 182-197, 2002.
7. J. Demšar. Statistical comparisons of classifiers over multiple data sets. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 7:1 30, 2006.
8. L. J. Eshelman. The CHC Adaptive Search Algorithm: How to Have Safe Search When Engaging in Nontraditional Genetic Recombination, pages 265-283. Morgan Kaufmann, 1991.
9. Mikkel T. Jensen. Guiding Single-Objective Optimization Using Multi-objective Methods. In Günther Raidl et al, editor, Applications of Evolutionary Computing. Evoworkshops 2003: EvoBIO, EvoCOP, EvoIASP, EvoMUSART, EvoROB, and EvoSTIM, pages 199-210, Essex, UK, April 2003. Springer. Lecture Notes in Computer Science Vol. 2611.
10. Joshua D. Knowles, Richard A. Watson, and David W. Corne. Reducing Local Optima in Single-Objective Problems by Multi-objectivization. In Eckart Zitzler, Kalyanmoy Deb, Lothar Thiele, Carlos A. Coello Coello, and David Corne, editors, First International Conference on Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization, pages 268-282. Springer-Verlag. Lecture Notes in Computer Science No. 1993, 2001.
11. Herv Meunier, El-Ghazali Talbi, and Philippe Reininger. A multiobjective genetic algorithm for radio network optimization. In Proceedings of the 2000 Congress on Evolutionary Computation CEC00, pages 317-324, La Jolla Marriott Hotel La Jolla, California, USA, 6-9 2000. IEEE Press.
12. Silvio Priem Mendes, Juan A. Gómez Pulido, Miguel A. Vega Rodríguez, Mara D. Jaraíz Simón, Juan M. Sánchez Pérez. Proceedings of the Second IEEE International Conference on e Science, and Grid Computing. A differential evolution based algorithm to optimize the radio network design problem. In Proceedings of the Second IEEE International Conference on e-Science and Grid Computing., 2006.
13. Larry Raisanen and Roger Whitaker. Comparison and evaluation of multiple objective genetic algorithms for the antenna placement problem. Mobile Networks and Applications, 10:79-88, 2005.
14. E. Zitzler, M. Laumanns, and L. Thiele. SPEA2: Improving the strength pareto evolutionary algorithm. Technical Report 103, Computer Engineering and Networks Laboratory (TIK), Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH), Zurich, Switzerland, 2001.
15. E. Zitzler and L. Thiele. Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithms: A Comparative Case Study and the Strength Pareto Approach. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 3(4):257-271, 1999.