A stakeholder approach to implementing e-learning in a university

British Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 38, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 784-794

  Cook, John ^a,b   Holley, Debbie ^b   Andrew, David ^b  

^a Reusable Learning Objects CETL ^*

^b LONDON METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENGINEERING EDUCATION; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; STUDENTS;

DYNAMIC EXTENSION; STAKEHOLDERS;

E-LEARNING;

EID: 34548063485     PISSN: 00071013     EISSN: 14678535     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00755.x     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (11)

1. Boyle, T. (2003). Design principles for authoring dynamic, reusable learning objects. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 19, 1, 46 58.
2. Boyle, T. Cook, J. (2001). Towards a pedagogically sound basis for learning object portability and re-use. In G. Kennedy, M. Keppell, C. McNaught T. Petrovic (Eds Meeting at the crossroads. Proceedings of the 18th Annual Conference of the Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (pp. 101-109). Retrieved January 19, 2007, from http://www.ascilite. org.au/conferences/melbourne01/pdf/papers/boylet.pdf
3. Brynjolfsson, E., Renshaw, A. A. van Alstyne, M. (1997). The matrix of change: a tool for business process reengineering. MIT Sloan School of Management. Retrieved June 4 2006, from http://ccs.mit.edu/papers/CCSWP189/ ccswp189
4. Burns, T., Sinfield, S. Holley, D. (2006). The silent stakeholder - a critique of the government e-learning strategy. Paper presented to the International Corporate Social Responsibility Conference, May, Idrine, Turkey.
5. Cook, J., Bradley, C., Holley, D., Smith, C. Haynes, R. (2006). Introducing blended mLearning solutions for higher education students, October 22-25. Paper presented at mLearn Conference, Banff Canada.
6. RLO-CETL Facebook (2007). Facebook homepage for RLO-CETL - Reusable Learning Objects. Facebook site for Centre for Excellence in Teaching and Learning in Reusable Learning Objects. Accessed 21 May 2007, from http://londonmu.facebook.com/group.php?gid=2304112566
7. Gladwell, M. (2000). The tipping point: how little things can make a big difference. Boston : Little, Brown.
8. Holley, D., Andrew, D., Cook, J., Celik C. Mitchell, A. (2006). Elements of expectancy: incorporating the student voice in the online design process. Paper presented at Networked Learning Conference 2006, April 10-12, Lancaster University.
9. Schutz, A. (1973). Collected papers I: the problem of social reality. The Hague, The Netherlands : Martinus Nijhoff.
10. Schwandt, T. A. (1994). Constructivist, interpretivist approaches to human inquiry. In N. K. Denzin Y. S. Lincoln (Eds Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 118 137). Newbury Park, CA : Sage.
11. Shaw, S. (2006). The ICT test bed project. Harnessing technology for 21st century education. Retrieved June 4, 2006, from http://www.becta.org.uk/ page_documents/corporate/extra/shaw.ppt