Tissue banking in a regulated environment - Does this help the patient? Part 2 - Patient views and expectations (including the EUROPA DONNA forum UK position)

Pathobiology

Volumn 74, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 223-226

  Borisch, Bettina ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Clinical research; Consent; Empowerment; Regulatory developments; Tissue banking

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL RESEARCH; HEALTH CARE FACILITY; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; LAW; LEGAL ASPECT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; UNITED KINGDOM;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; GREAT BRITAIN; HEALTH CARE COALITIONS; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; TISSUE BANKS;

EID: 34548057551     PISSN: 10152008     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000104449     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Pentz RD, Billot L, Wendler D: Research on stored biological samples: views of African American and White American cancer patients. Am J Med Genet A 2006;140:733-739.
2. Schulz P, Nakamoto K, Brinberg D, Haes J: More than nation and knowledge: cultural micro-diversity and organ donation in Switzerland. Patient Educ Couns 2006;64:294-302.
3. Sanner M: A comparison of public attitudes toward autopsy, organ donation, and anatomic dissection. A Swedish survey. JAMA 1994;271:284-288.
4. Lipworth W, Ankeny R, Kerridge I: Consent in crisis: the need to reconceptualize consent to tissue banking research. Intern Med J 2006;36:124-128.
5. Ashcroft R: The ethics of reusing archived tissue for research. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 2000;26:408-411.
6. Kaphingst KA, Janoff JM, Harris LN, Emmons KM: Views of female breast cancer patients who donated biologic samples regarding storage and use of samples for genetic research. Clin Genet 2006;69:393-398.
7. Neroth P: EU plans to boost research. Lancet 2005;365:1455-1456.