Statistical disclosure control methods for census frequency tables

International Statistical Review

Volumn 75, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 199-217

  Shlomo, Natalie ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^b HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

Author keywords

Data utility measures; Disclosure risk measures; R U confidentiality map

Indexed keywords

EID: 34548045989     PISSN: 03067734     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-5823.2007.00010.x     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Boyd, M. & Vickers, P. (1999). Record swapping - A possible disclosure control approach for the 2001 UK census. UNECE/Eurostat Work Session on Statistical Data Confidentiality, Thessaloniki, March 1999.
2. Carter, R. (2000). Notes on disclosure control procedures for tabular outputs from the UK 2001 Census. ONS Internal Report.
3. Duncan, G., Keller-McNulty, S. & Stokes, S. (2001). Disclosure risk vs. data utility: The R-U confidentiality map. Technical Report LA-UR-01-6428, Statistical Sciences Group, Los Alamos, NM: Los Alamos National Laboratory
4. Gomatam, S. & Karr, A. (2003). Distortion measures for categorical data swapping. Technical Report Number 131, National Institute of Statistical Sciences.
5. Gomatam, S., Karr, A. & Sanil, A. (2003). A risk-utility framework for categorical data swapping. Technical Report Number 132, National Institute of Statistical Sciences.
6. Gouweleeuw, J., Kooiman, P., Willenborg, L.C.R. J. & De Wolf, P.P. (1998). Post randomisation for statistical disclosure control: Theory and implementation. Journal of Official Statistics, 14, 463-478.
7. Hundepool, A. (2002). The CASC Project. In Inference Control in Statistical Databases: From Theory to Practice. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Ed. J. Domingo-Ferrer, Vol. 2316. New York: Springer-Verlag.
8. Willenborg, L. & de Waal, T. (2001). Elements of Statistical Disclosure Control, Lecture Notes in Statistics, 155. New York: Springer Verlag.