Morphological and molecular characterisation of Panagrellus spp. (Cephalobina: Panagrolaimidae): Taxonomic status and phylogenetic relationships

Nematology

Volumn 8, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 921-938

  Stock, S Patricia ^a   Nadler, Steven A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

28S rDNA; Evolutionary relationships; Free living nematodes; Molecular; Morphology; Phylogeny; Systematics; Taxonomy

Indexed keywords

DNA; GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION; MOLECULAR ANALYSIS; MORPHOLOGY; MORPHOMETRY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NEMATODE; NUCLEIC ACID ANALYSIS; PARSIMONY ANALYSIS; PHYLOGENETICS; PHYLOGENY; TAXONOMY;

HEXAPODA; NEMATODA; PANAGRELLUS; PANAGRELLUS DUBIUS; PANAGRELLUS REDIVIVUS; PANAGROLAIMIDAE;

EID: 34548042506     PISSN: 13885545     EISSN: 15685411     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1163/156854106779799277     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Adams, B.J. (1998). Species concepts and the evolutionary paradigm in modern nematology. Journal of Nematology 30, 1-21.
2. Andrássy, I. (1984): Klasse Nematoda (Ordnungen Monhysterida, Desmocolecida, Araeolaimida, Chromadorida, Rhabditida). Stuttgart, Germany, Gustav Fischer Verlag, 509 pp.
3. Ausubel, F.M., Brent, R., Kingston, R.E., Moore, D.D., Seidman, J.G., Smith, J.A. & Struhl, K. (1989). Short protocols in molecular biology. New York, USA, Greene Publishing Associates & Wiley-Interscience, 387 pp.
4. Courtney, W.D., Polley, D. & Miller, V.L. (1965). TAF, an improved fixative in nematode techniques. Plant Disease Reporter 39, 570-571.
5. Freed, R.S.P., Eisensmith, S., Goetz, R., Reicovsky, V.W., Smail, S. & Woelberg, P. (1991). MSTAT-C: A software program for the design, management and analysis of agronomic research experiments. East Lansing, Michigan State University, MI, USA.
6. Goodey, J.B. (1963). Soil and freshwater nematodes, 2nd edition. London, UK, Methuen & Co., 544 pp.
7. Goodey, T. (1943). On the systematic relationship of the vinegar eelworm, Turbatrix aceti, and its congeners, with a description of a new species. Journal of Helminthology 21, 1-9.
8. Goodey T. (1945). A note on the subfamily Turbatricinae and the genus Turbator Goodey, 1943. Journal of Helminthology 21, 1-9.
9. Hechler, H.C. (1971). Taxonomic notes on four species of Panagrellus Thorne (Nematoda: Cephalobidae). Journal of Nematology 3, 227-237.
10. Kerrigan, J., Smith, M., Rogers, J.D. & Poot, G.A. (2001). Ascobotryozyma americana gen. nov. et sp. nov. and its anamorphus Botryozyma americana, an unusual yeast from the surface of nematodes. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 179, 7-16.
11. Kerrigan, J., Smith, M., Rogers, J.D., Poot, G.A. & Douhan, G.W. (2003). Ascobotryozyma cognate sp. nov., a new ascomycetous yeast associated with nematodes from wood-boring beetle galleries. Mycological Research 107, 1110-1120.
12. Kerrigan, J., Smith, M., Rogers, J.D. & Poot, G.A. (2004). Botryozyma mucatilis sp. nov., an anamorphic ascomycetous yeast associated with nematodes in poplar slime flux. FEMS Yeast Research 4, 849-656.
13. Linnaeus, C. (1767). Systema naturae per regna tria naturae, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species cum characteribus, differentiis, synomymis, locis. Editio duodecima, reformata, pp. 533-1327.
14. Loytynoja, A. & Milinkovitch, M.C. (2003). A hidden Markov model for progressive multiple alignment. Bioinformatics 19, 1505-1513.
15. de Man, J.G. (1910). Beiträge zur Kenntnis der in dem weißen Schleimfluß der Eichen lebeden Angulluliden, nebst Untersuchungen über den Bau des Essigälchens und der Gatung Anguillula Ehrb. Zoologische Jahrbuch Systematik 29, 359-394.
16. Massey, C.L. (1974). Biology and taxonomy of nematode parasites and associates of bark beetles in the United States. Agriculture Handbook 446, Forest Service, US Department of Agriculture, 233 pp.
17. Menzel, R. (1922). Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Mikrofauna von Niedrländisch-Ost-Indien II. Über den tierischen Inhalt der Kannnen von Nepenthes melamorpha Reinw., mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der Nematoden. Treubia 3, 116-122.
18. Nadler, S.A. (2002). Species delimitation and nematode biodiversity: phylogenies rule. Nematology 4, 615-625.
19. Nadler, S.A. & Hudspeth, D.S.S. (1998). Ribosomal DNA and phylogeny of the Ascaridoidea (Nemata: Secernentea): Implications for morphological evolution and classification. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 10, 221-236.
20. Nadler, S.A., De Ley, P., Mundo-Ocampo, M., Smythe, A.B., Stock, S.P., Bumbarger, D., Adams, B.J., Tandingan De Ley, I., Holovachov, O. & Baldwin, J.G. (2006). Phylogeny of Cephalobina (Nematoda): Molecular evidence for recurrent evolution of probolae and incongruence with traditional classifications. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 40, 696-711.
21. Reyment, R.A., Blackith, R.E. & Campbell, N.A. (1981). Multivariate morphometrics. New York, NY, USA, Cornell University, 198 pp.
22. Rühm, W. (1956). Die Nematoden der Ipiden. Parasitologische Schriftenreihe 6, 1-437.
23. Sanderson, M.J., Donoghue, M.J., Piel, W. & Eriksson, T. (1994). TreeBASE: A prototype database of phylogenetic analyses and an interactive tool for browsing the phylogeny of life. American Journal of Botany 81, 183.
24. Sanwal, K.C. (1960). Panagrellus dubius n. sp. (Nematoda: Turbatricidae Goodey, 1943) from frass of beetle Stenochetus lapathi (L.) with remarks on redescription of Anguillula rediviva (L., 1767). Canadian Journal of Zoology 38, 751-753.
25. Seinhorst, J.W. (1959). A rapid method for the transfer of nematodes from fixative to anhydrous glycerin. Nematologica 4, 67-69.
26. Simon, C. (1983). A new coding procedure for morphometric data with an example from periodical cicada wing veins. In: Felsenstein, J. (Ed.). Neumerical taxonomy. Berlin, Germany, Springer-Verlag, pp. 378-383.
27. Smith, M., Shann, C., Batenburg Van der Vegetew, C., Schmitt, R., Wehrli, E., Roeijmans, H.J. & Van Eijk, G.W. (1992). Botryozyma nematodophila new genus new species Candidaceae. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 61, 277-284.
28. Stock, S.P. & Kaya, H.K. (1997). A multivariate analysis of morphometric characters of Heterorhabditis species (Nemata: Heterorhabditidae) and the role of morphometrics in the taxonomy of species of the genus. Journal of Parasitology 82, 806-813.
29. Stock, S.P., Mráček, Z. & Webster, J.M. (2000). Morphological variation between allopatric populations of Steinernema kraussei (Steiner, 1923) (Rhabditida: Steinernematidae). Nematology 2, 143-152.
30. Stock, S.P., De Ley, P., Mundo-Ocampo, M., Baldwin, J.G. & Nadler, S.A. (2002). Plectonchus hunti n. sp. and Panagrobelus stammeri (Rühm, 1956): Implications of new morphological observations for characterisation of these closely related genera (Nematoda: Panagrolaimoidea). Nematology 4, 403-419.
31. Sukul, N.C. (1971). New free-living nematodes from the thermal spring of Tantloya, Bihar. Indian Journal of Helminthology 23, 135-145.
32. Swofford, D.L. (1998). PAUP*Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (and other methods), version 4. Sunderland, MA, USA, Sinauer Associates, 257 pp.
33. Thalolikhin, S.J. (1965). Novaja saprobiotischeskaja nematoda Panagrellus silusioides sp. n. Vestnik Leningradskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta 21, 152-153.
34. Thorne, G. (1938). Notes on free-living and plant-parasitic nematodes. IV. Proceedings of the Helminthological Society of Washington 5, 64-65.
35. Thorpe, R.S. (1976). Biometric analysis of geographic variation and racial affinities. Biological Review 51, 407-452.
36. Weingärtner, I. (1954). Die Nematoden des Kompostes. Sitzungsberichte der Physikalisch Medizinischen Sozietät, Erlangen 76, 86-107.