Effect of bulk deformation on rubber adhesion

Wear

Volumn 263, Issue 7-12 SPEC. ISS., 2007, Pages 1016-1022

  Maeda, K ^a   Bismarck, A ^a   Briscoe, B ^a  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Roll formation; Surface energy; Wear mechanism

Indexed keywords

ADHESION; CARBON BLACK; CONTACT ANGLE; ENTROPY; FREE ENERGY; FRICTION; HYSTERESIS; RUBBER; SURFACE TENSION;

ADHESIVE FORCE; INTERNAL ENERGY; ROLL FORMATION; RUBBER ADHESION; STYRENE BUTADIENE RUBBER; WEAR MECHANISM;

DEFORMATION;

ADHESION; CARBON BLACK; CONTACT ANGLE; DEFORMATION; ENTROPY; FREE ENERGY; FRICTION; HYSTERESIS; RUBBER; SURFACE TENSION;

EID: 34548029187     PISSN: 00431648     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2007.02.002     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Tabor D. Hysteresis losses in the friction of lubricated rubber. Rubber Chem. Technol. 33 (1960) 142-150
2. Grosch K. The relation between the friction and viscoelastic properties of rubber. Rubber Chem. Technol. 37 (1964) 386-403
3. Ludema K., and Tabor D. The friction and visco-elastic properties of polymeric solids. Wear 9 (1966) 329-348
4. Greenwood J., and Tabor D. The friction of hard sliders on lubricated rubber. Proc. Phys. Soc. 71 (1958) 989-1001
5. Schallamach A. A theory of dynamic rubber friction. Wear 6 (1963) 375-382
6. Schallamach A. Friction and Wear. Wear 1 (1957/58) 384-417
7. Schallamach A. How does rubber slide?. Wear 17 (1971) 301-312
8. Briggs G., and Briscoe B. The dissipation of energy in the friction of rubber. Wear 35 (1975) 357-364
9. Briggs G., and Briscoe B. Surface roughness and the friction and adhesion of elastomers. Wear 57 (1979) 269-280
10. Johnson K., Kendall K., and Roberts A. Surface energy and the contact of elastic solids. Proc. R. Soc. London A 324 (1971) 301-313
11. Wu S. Polymer Interface and Adhesion (1982), Marcel Dekker Inc., New York (pp. 339-342)
12. Gent A.N., and Petrich R.P. Adhesion of viscoelastic materials to rigid substrates. Proc. R. Soc. London A310 (1969) 433-448
13. Aharoni S. Wear of polymers by roll-formation. Wear 25 (1973) 309-327
14. Extrand C., and Gent A. Contact angle and spectroscopic studies of chlorinated and unchlorinated natural rubber surfaces. Rubber Chem. Technol. 61 (1988) 688-697
15. van Oss C.J. Use of the combined Lifshitz-van der Waals and Lewis acid-base approaches in determining the apolar and polar contributions to surface and interfacial tensions and free energies. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 16 (2002) 669-677
16. Kwok D., Li D., and Neumann A. Evaluation of the Lifshitz-van der Waals/acid-base approach to determine interfacial tensions. Langmuir 10 (1994) 1323-1328
17. Kwok D., Lee Y., and Neumann A. Evaluation of the Lifshitz-van der Waals/acid-base approach to determine interfacial tensions 2. Langmuir 14 (1998) 2548-2553
18. Lamy B. Effect of brittleness index and sliding speed on the morphology of surface scratching in abrasive or erosive processes. Tribol. Int. 17 (1984) 35-38
19. Briscoe B., Delfino A., and Pelillo E. Single-pass pendulum scratching of poly(styrene) and poly(methylmethacrylate). Wear 225-229 (1999) 319-328
20. Maeda K., Bismarck A., and Briscoe B. Mechanisms of scratching frictions and damage maps for rubber compounds. Wear 259 (2005) 651-660
21. Johnson Jr. R.E., and Dettre R.H. Contact Angle Hysteresis. I. Study of an Idealized Rough Surface, in: Contact Angle Wettability and Adhesion, Advances in Chemistry Series 43 (1964), American Chemical Society, Washington, D.C. (pp. 112-135)
22. Dettre R.H., and Johnson Jr. R.E. Contact Angle Hysteresis. II. Contact Angle Measurements on Rough Surfaces, in: Contact Angle Wettability and Adhesion, Advances in Chemistry Series 43 (1964), American Chemical Society, Washington, D.C. (pp. 136-144)