Pragmatics of LF intervention effects: Japanese and Korean Wh-interrogatives

Journal of Pragmatics

Volumn 39, Issue 9, 2007, Pages 1570-1590

  Tomioka, Satoshi ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE   (United States)

Author keywords

Focus; Intervention effects; Logical form (LF); Negative polarity items (NPIs); Post focus reduction; Scrambling; Topic

Indexed keywords

EID: 34548025833     PISSN: 03782166     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2007.03.002     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Beck S. Quantified structures as barriers for LF movement. Natural Language Semantics 4 (1996) 1-56
2. Beck S. Intervention effects follow from focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics 14 (2006) 1-56
3. Beck S., and Kim S.-S. On Wh- and operator-scope in Korean. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 6 (1997) 339-384
4. Chafe W. Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view. In: Li C. (Ed). Subject and Topic (1976), Academic Press, New York 25-55
5. Cho E. Why, contrastive topic, and LF movement. In: Silva D. (Ed). Japanese and Korean Linguistics 8 (1998), CSLI Publications, Stanford 403-415
6. Cole P., and Hermon G. The typology of wh movement: Wh-questions in Malay. Syntax 1 (1998) 221-258
7. Deguchi M., and Kitagawa Y. Prosody and wh-questions. In: Hirotani M. (Ed). The Proceedings of NELS 32, GLSA. University of Massachusetts, Amherst (2002)
8. Erteschik-Shir N. The Dynamics of Focus Structure (1997), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
9. Hagstrom, Paul, 1998. Decomposing Questions. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
10. Hamblin C.L. Questions in Montague English. Foundations of Language 10 (1973) 41-53
11. Heim, Irene, 1982. The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
12. Heycock C. Focus projection in Japanese. In: Gonzalez M. (Ed). Proceedings of NELS 23, GLSA. University of Massachusetts, Amherst (1994) 157-171
13. Hirotani, Masako, 2004. Prosody and LF: Processing Japanese Wh-questions. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
14. Hoji, Hajime, 1985. Logical Form Constraints and Configurational Structures in Japanese. Doctoral dissertation, University of Washington.
15. Huang, James C.-T. 1982. Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
16. Ishihara S. Invisible but audible wh-scope marking: Wh-constructions and deaccenting in Japanese. In: Mikkelsen L., and Potts C. (Eds). Proceedings of WCCFL 21. Cascadilla Press, Somerville, Mass. (2002) 180-193
17. Jun, Sun-Ah, 1993. The Phonetics and Phonology of Korean Prosody. Doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University, Columbus.
18. Kadmon N., and Landman F. ANY. Linguistics and Philosophy 16 (1993) 353-422
19. Kawashima, Ruriko, 1994. Deriving paradoxical flip-flop change in quantificational force in Japanese. In: Koizumi, M., Ura, H. (Eds.), Formal Approaches to Japanese Linguistics 1, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 24, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., pp. 121-140.
20. Kenesei I., and Vogel I. Prosodic phonology in Hungarian. Acta Linguistics Hungarica 39 (1989) 149-193
21. Kenstowicz, Michael, Sohn, Hyang-Sook, 1997. Phrasing and focus in Northern Kyungsang Korean. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 30, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., pp. 25-47.
22. Kim, Shin-sook, 2005. Focus intervention effects in questions. In: Presented at Theoretical East Asian Languages 3, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass.
23. Ko H.-j. Syntax of wh-in-situ: Merge into [Spec, CP] in the overt syntax. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 23 (2005) 867-916
24. Kratzer A., and Shimoyama J. Indeterminate pronouns: a view from Japanese. Proceedings of the Third Tokyo Conference on Psycholinguistics (2002) 1-25
25. Krifka M. For a structured meaning account of questions and answers. In: Fery C., and Sternefeld W. (Eds). Audiatur Vox Sapientiae. A Festschrift for Arnim von Stechow (2001), Akademie Verlag (= Studia Grammatica 52), Berlin 287-319
26. Kuno S. The Structure of the Japanese Language (1973), MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
27. Kuroda, Shigeyuki, 1965. Generative Grammatical studies in the Japanese Language. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
28. Kuroda S. Japanese Syntax and Semantics (1992), Kluwer, Dordrecht
29. Kuroda S. Focusing on the matter of topic: a study of wa and ga in Japanese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 14 (2005) 1-58
30. Kuwabara, Kazuki, 1998. Overt wh-movement and scope fixing scrambling: a preliminary study. In: Kazuko, Inoue (Ed.), Report (2) Researching and Verifying an Advanced Theory of Human Language, pp. 115-127.
31. Lee, Mina, 2002. Why is 'why' different? Presented at Chicago Linguistics Society 38.
32. Lee K.-s., and Tomioka S. LF intervention effects are topic effects. Presented at Conference on Peripheries. University of York, England (2000)
33. Miyagawa, Shigeru, 1997. On the Nature of wh-scope, MIT.
34. Nagahara, Hiroyuki, 1994. Phonological Phrasing in Japanese. Doctoral dissertation, UCLA.
35. Nishigauchi T. Quantification in Natural Language (1990), Kluwer, Dordrecht
36. Pierrehumbert J., and Beckman M. Japanese Tone Structure (1988), MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
37. Portner P., and Yabushita K. The semantics and pragmatics of topic phrases. Linguistics and Philosophy 21 (1998) 117-157
38. Prince E. Toward a taxonomy of given/new information. In: Cole P. (Ed). Radical Pragmatics (1981), Academic Press, New York 223-255
39. Reinhart, Tanya, 1993. Wh-in-situ in the framework of the Minimalist Program. OTS Working Papers, Research Institute for Language and Speech, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
40. Rooth M. A theory of focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics 1 (1992) 75-116
41. Schwarzschild R. GIVENness, Avoid F, and other constraints on the placement of accent. Natural Language Semantics 7 (1999) 141-177
42. Sim, Chang-yong, 2003. Two types of multiple accusative constructions in Korean. In: Proceedings of NELS 32, GLSA, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
43. Szabolcsi A. Strategies for scope taking. In: Szabolcsi (Ed). Ways of Scope Taking (1997), Kluwer, Dordrecht 109-154
44. Tanaka H. Invisible movement of sika-nai and the linear crossing constraint. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 6 (1997) 143-188
45. Tomioka, Satoshi, 1999. LF Wh-islands (or the lack thereof) in Japanese, Universität Tübingen & University of Delaware.
46. Tomioka, Satoshi, 2007. A 'why' question in intervention effects. University of Delaware
47. Tsai, W.-T. Dylan, 1994. On Economizing the Theory of A'-Dependencies. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
48. Vallduví, Enric, 1992. The Information Component. Doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
49. Vallduví E. Structural properties of information packaging in Catalan. In: Kiss K. (Ed). Discourse Configurational Languages (1995), Oxford University Press, New York 122-153
50. Watanabe A. Subjacency and s-structure movement of wh-in-situ. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 1 (1992) 255-291
51. Watanabe, Shin, 1998. A note on scope dependencies in Japanese multiple Wh-questions. In: Akatsuka, N., et al. (Eds.), Japanese and Korean Linguistics, vol. 7, CSLI, Stanford, pp. 553-548.