Affordance in interaction

ACM International Conference Proceeding Series

Volumn 250, Issue , 2006, Pages 92-99

  Vyas, Dhaval ^a   Chisalita, Cristina M ^b   Van Der Veer, Gerrit C ^c  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

^c OPEN UNIVERSITY OF THE NETHERLANDS   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Affordance; HCI; Interpretations and meanings; Structuration theory; Technology in practice

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION ANALYSIS; SEMANTICS; SOCIAL ASPECTS;

AFFORDANCE; STRUCTURATION THEORY; TECHNOLOGY-IN-PRACTICE;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

EID: 34548020762     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1274892.1274907     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Bærentsen, K. B., & Trettvik, J. (2002). An activity theory approach to affordance. Proceedings of NordiCHI 2002, New York, NY: ACM. pp 51-60.
2. Bell, G., Blythe, M. and Sengers, P. (2005). Making by Making Strange: Defamiliarization and the Design of Domestic Technologies. In ACM Transactions on Computer-Homan Interaction. 12 (2), June 2005. pp. 149-173. ACM Press.
3. Chisalita, C., M. (2006). Contextual issues in the design and use of technology in organizations. Ph.D. Thesis. Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
4. Djajadiningrat, J.P., Gaver, W.W. and Frens, J.W. (2000). Interaction Relabelling and Extreme Characters: Methods for exploring aesthetic interactions. Proceedings of DIS 2000, ACM, New York.
5. Dourish, P. 2001. Where the action is: The foundation of embodied interaction. MIT-Press: Cambridge, MA.
6. Gaver, W. (1991). Technology affordances. In Proceedings of the CHI 1991, ACM Press: New York, 79-84.
7. Gaver, W., Beaver, J., & Benford, S. (2003). Ambiguity as a Resource for Design. Proceedings of CHI 2003, ACM Press: New York, pp 233-240.
8. Gibson, J.J. (1986). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Houghton Mifflin Company. USA.
9. Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.
10. Kasabach, K., Paciaone, C., Stivoric, J., Gemperle, F. & Siewiorek, D. (1998). Digital Ink: A familiar idea with Technological Might! Proceedings of CHI 98 ACM Press: New York, pp 175-176.
11. McCarthy, J., Wright, P. (2004). Technology as Experience. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
12. Norman, D. A. (1988). The Psychology of Everyday Things. Basic Books, New York. In paperback as The Design of Everyday Things. Doubleday, New York, 1990.
13. Orlikowski, W., J. (2000). Using technology and constituting structures: a practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organization Science, vol. 11, no. 4. p. 404-428.
14. Pliskin, N., Romm T., Lee A., S., & Weber, S. (1993). Presumed versus actual organizational culture: managerial implication of information system. The Computer Journal, 36(2), 143-152.
15. Puerta Melguizo MC, Chisalita C, van der Veer CG (2002) Assessing users mental models in designing complex systems. In: Proceedings of IEEE international conference on systems, man and cybernetics 2002. Hammamet, Tunisia.
16. Sengers, P., Gaver, W. (2005). Designing for Interpretations. In the Proceedings of HCI International 2005. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah NJ.