Alternative Assessment in Elementary School Mathematics

Childhood Education

Volumn 74, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 220-224

  Adams, Thomasenia L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34548015936     PISSN: 00094056     EISSN: 21620725     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00094056.1998.10521938     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Doud, D., 1989. The role of self-assessment in student grading. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 14 (1): 20–30.
2. Frechtling, J. A., 1991. Performance assessment: Moonstruck or the real thing?. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practices, 10: 22–25.
3. Hiebert, J., and Carpenter, T. P., 1992. “ Learning and teaching with understanding ”. In Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning, Edited by: Grouws, D. A., 65–100. New York: Macmillan.
4. Liedtke, W., 1988. Diagnosis in mathematics: The advantages of an interview. Arithmetic Teacher, 36 (3): 26–29.
5. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. 1989. Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics, Reston, VA: Author.
6. Pidgeon, S., 1992. “ Assessment at key stage 1: Teacher assessment through record-keeping ”. In Assessment in early childhood education, Edited by: Kelly, A. V., and Blenkin, G. M., 122–143. London: Paul Chapman.
7. Thompson, A. G., and Briars, D. J., 1989. Assessing students' learning to inform teaching: The message in NCTM's Evaluation Standards. Arithmetic Teacher, 37 (4): 22–26.
8. Webb, N. L., 1992. “ Assessment of students' knowledge of mathematics: Steps toward a theory ”. In Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning, Edited by: Grouws, D. A., 661–683. New York: Macmillan.
9. Wilson, L. D., 1993. What gets graded is what gets valued. National Center for Research in Mathematical Sciences Education Review, 2 (3): 4–8.