Genetic algorithm based multi-agent system applied to test generation

Computers and Education

Volumn 49, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 1205-1223

  Meng, Anbo ^a,b   Ye, Luqing ^a   Roy, Daniel ^b   Padilla, Pierre ^b  

^a HUAZHONG UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE LORRAINE   (France)

Author keywords

AUML; Genetic algorithm; JADE; Multi agent; Ontology; Test generation

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATIC TEST PATTERN GENERATION; CHROMOSOMES; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GENETIC ALGORITHMS; MESSAGE PASSING; ONTOLOGY;

ACTIVITY DIAGRAM; SEQUENCE DIAGRAM; TASK EXECUTION FLOW;

MULTI AGENT SYSTEMS;

EID: 34548015439     PISSN: 03601315     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2006.01.012     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Adeli H., and Cheng N. Concurrent genetic algorithms for optimization of large structures. ASCE Journal of Aerospace Engineering 7 3 (1994) 276-296
2. Bloom. Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. In: Bloom B. (Ed). Handbook 1, cognitive domain (1956), Longman, New York
3. Cai J., and Thierauf G. Evolution strategies for solving discrete optimization problems. Advances in Engineering Software 25 (1996) 177-183
4. Chmiel K., et al. Testing the efficiency of JADE agent platform. Proceedings of the 3rd international symposium on parallel and distributed computing, Cork, Ireland (2004), IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA 49-57
5. FIPA00008, (2002). FIPA SL Content Language Specification. Foundation for intelligent physical agents. Available from http://www.fipa.org/specs/fipa00008/.
6. FIPA00037, 2000. FIPA Communicative Act Library Specification. Foundation for intelligent physical agents. Available from http://www.fipa.org/specs/fipa00037/.
7. Genesereth M., and Ketchpel S. Software agents. Communication of ACM 37 7 (1994) 48-53
8. Gruber T.R. A translation approach to portable ontology specification. Knowledge Acquisition 5 (1993) 199-220
9. Guarino N., Masolo C., and Vetere G. Ontoseek: using large linguistic ontologies for accessing on-line yellow pages and product catalogs. IEEE Intelligent Systems 14 3 (1999) 70-80
10. Hammel U., Back T., and Schwefel H.-P. Evolutionary computation: comments on the history and current state. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 1 1 (1999) 3-17
11. Holsapple W.C., and Joshi K.D.A. Collaborative approach to ontology design. Communication of the ACM 45 2 (2002) 42-47
12. Huhns M., and Mohamed A. Benevolent agents. IEEE Internet Computing 3 2 (1999) 96-98
13. JADE, (2005). Java agent development framework.
14. Lind, J., (2000). Issues in agent-oriented software engineering. In First international workshop on agent-oriented software engineering (AOSE-2000), Limerick, Ireland.
15. Protege, (2000). User guide of protege. Available from http://protege.stanford.edu/publications/UserGuide.pdf.
16. Rothenfluhh T., Gennari J., Eriksson H., Puerta A., Tu S., and Musen M. Reusable ontologies, knowledge acquisition tools, and performance systems. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 3 4 (1996) 303-332
17. Solomos K., and Avouris N. Learning from multiple collaborating intelligent tutors: an agent-based approach. Journal of Interactive Learning Research 10 4 (1999) 243-262
18. Valente A., Russ T., MacGregor R., and Swartout W. Building and (re)using an ontology of air campaign planning. IEEE Intelligent Systems 14 1 (1999) 27-36
19. Whatley J.G., Staniford G., Beer M., and Scown P. Intelligent agents to support students working in group online. Journal of Interactive Learning Research 10 3 (1999) 361-370
20. Wooldridge M.J., and Jennings N.R. Software engineering with agents: pitfalls and pratfalls. IEEE Internet Computing 3 3 (1999) 20-27
21. Zitzler E., Thiele L., and Deb K. Comparison of multiobjective evolutionary algorithms, empirical results. Evolutionary Computation 8 2 (2000) 173-195