A study of the safety of current gastrointestinal endoscopy (EGD)

Endoscopy

Volumn 39, Issue 8, 2007, Pages 692-700

  McLernon, D J ^a   Donnan, P T ^a   Crozier, A ^a   Dillon, J ^b   Mowat, C ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; ESOPHAGOGASTRODUODENOSCOPY; ESOPHAGUS VARICES; FEMALE; GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY; HEMATEMESIS; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HUMAN; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MELENA; MORTALITY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGISTER; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS; RISK FACTOR; UNITED KINGDOM; AGE; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CAUSE OF DEATH; EVALUATION; FOLLOW UP; GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PROBABILITY; SAFETY; SEX DIFFERENCE; STATISTICAL MODEL; SURVIVAL; VALIDATION STUDY;

AGE FACTORS; AGED; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CAUSE OF DEATH; COHORT STUDIES; ENDOSCOPES, GASTROINTESTINAL; ENDOSCOPY, GASTROINTESTINAL; EVALUATION STUDIES; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROBABILITY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; SAFETY MANAGEMENT; SEX FACTORS; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 34548011064     PISSN: 0013726X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-966578     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Quine MA, Bell GD, McCloy RF et al. A prospective audit of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in two regions of England: safety, staffing and sedation methods. Gut 1995; 36: 462-467
2. Barlow D, Bell GD, Chalmers AH et al. and UK Academy of Medical Royal Colleges and their Faculties. Implementing and ensuring safe sedation practice for healthcare procedures in adults: report of an intercollegiate working party chaired by the Royal College of Anaesthetists, 2001. Available from: http://www.rcoa.ac.uk/docs/ safesedationpractice.pdf
3. Cullinane M, Gray AJG, Hargraves CMK et al. Scoping our practice: the 2004 report of the National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death (NCEPOD). Available from: http://www.ncepod.org.uk/ 2004report/index.htm
4. Callahan CM, Haag KM, Weinberger M et al. Outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy among older adults in a community setting. J Am Geriatr Soc 2000; 48: 1048-1054
5. Forbes RB, Colville S, Swingler RJ and the Scottish Motor Neurone Disease Research Group. Frequency, timing and outcome of gastrostomy tubes for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis/motor neurone disease - a record linkage study from the Scottish Motor Neurone Disease Register. J Neurol 2004; 251: 813-817
6. Dennis MS, Lewis SC, Warlow, C et al. Effect of timing and method of enteral tube feeding for dysphagic stroke patients (FOOD): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2005; 365: 764-772
7. Clarke I, Dunnet C, Camp J et al. Management of patients with stroke: identification and management of dysphagia. A national clinical guideline. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN). Scotland: SIGN, 2004
8. Evans JMM, McDevitt DG, MacDonald TM. The Tayside Medicines Monitoring Unit (MEMO): a record-linkage system for pharmacovigilance. Pharm Med 1995; 9: 177-184
9. Light VL, Slezak FA, Porter JA et al. Predictive factors for early mortality after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Gastrointest Endosc 1995; 42: 330-335
10. Bourdel-Marchasson I, Dumas F, Pinganaud G et al. Audit of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in long-term enteral feeding in a nursing home. Int J Qual Health Care 1997; 9: 297-302
11. Onishi J, Kuzuya M, Sakaguchi H. Survival rate alter percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in a long-term care hospital [letter]. Clin Nutr 2004; 23: 1248-1249