Argumentation structures in legal dossiers

Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 277-281

  Sombekke, Jobien ^a   Van Engers, Tom ^a   Prakken, Henry ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

ARGUMENTATION STRUCTURES; INFERENCE ENGINE; SOLICITOR;

LAWS AND LEGISLATION;

EID: 34548010772     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1276318.1276371     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. K.D. Ashley. Modeling Legal Argument: Reasoning with Cases and Hypotheticals. MIT Press, Cambridge, 1990.
2. J. Breuker, A. Valente, and R. Winkels. Legal ontologies in knowledge engineering and information management. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 12:241-277, 2004. Appeared in 2006.
3. J. Conrad and D. Dabney. A cognitive approach to judicial opinion structure: applying domain expertise to component analysis. Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, 1-11. ACM Press, New York, 2001.
4. J.C. Hage, Reasoning with Rules. An Essay on Legal Reasoning and its Underlying Logic, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht/Boston/London, 1997.
5. M. Henket. On the logical analysis of judicial decisions. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 5(2):153-164, June 1992.
6. M. Lauritsen. Intelligent Tools for Managing Factual Arguments. Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, 95-104. ACM Press, New York, 2005.
7. J. Plug. Indicators of obiter dicta. A pragma-dialectical analysis of textual clues for the reconstruction of legal argumentation. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 8:189-203, 2000.
8. H. Prakken. Incomplete arguments in legal discourse: a case study. In T. Bench-Capon, A. Daskalopulu, and R. Winkels, editors, Legal Knowledge and Information Systems, JURIX 2002: The Fifteenth Annual Conference, 93-102. IOS Press, Amsterdam, 2002.
9. H. Prakken. AI & Law, Logic and Argument Schemes. Argumentation, 19:303-320, 2005. Special issue on 'the Toulmin model today'.
10. H. Prakken. Argumentatiemanagement voor Juristen. (Argumentation management for lawyers. In Dutch) Inaugural Address Faculty of Law, University of Groningen, 2005.
11. CA. Reed and G.W.A. Rowe. Araucaria: Software for argument analysis, diagramming and representation. International Journal of AI Tools, 13:961-980, 2004.
12. E.L. Rissland, K.D. Ashley and R.P. Loui. AI and Law: a fruitful synergy. Artificial Intelligence, 150:1-15, 2003.
13. P. Thagard and C. Shelley. Abductive reasoning: Logic, visual thinking, and coherence. In M.-L. D. C. et al., editor, Logic and scientific methods, pages 413427. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1997.
14. B. Verheij. Virtual Arguments. On the Design of Argument Assistants for Lawyers and Other Arguers. T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague, 2005.
15. D. Walton. Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, 1996.