Parliament and political disengagement: Neither waving nor drowning

Political Quarterly

Volumn 78, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 364-373

  Kelso, Alexandra ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547997529     PISSN: 00323179     EISSN: 1467923X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-923X.2007.00865.x     Document Type: Review

References (13)

1. For example, M. Harrop An apathetic landslide: the British election of 2001 Government and Opposition, vol. 36, no. 3, 2001, pp. 295 313.
2. D. Judge, The Parliamentary State, London, Sage, 1993.
3. D. Judge, Representation: Theory and Practice in Britain, London, Routledge, 1999, p. 179.
4. P. Hirst, Representative Democracy and its Limits, London, Polity Press, 1999, p. 4.
5. HC 368, Connecting Parliament with the Public, Report from the Modernisation Committee, London, HMSO, 2004, para. 56.
6. HC 876, Report from the Joint Committee on the Draft Communications Bill, London, HMSO, 2002.
7. HC 7, Human Reproductive Technologies and the Law, London, HMSO, 2004; HC 199, Annual Report 2004, London, HMSO, 2005; both from the Science and Technology select committee.
8. HC 548, The Challenge of Diversity: Hate Crime in Northern Ireland, Report from the Northern Ireland Committee, London, HMSO, 2005.
9. Hansard Society, TellParliament.net: Interim Evaluation Report, London, Hansard Society, 2006.
10. Ibid., p. 15.
11. S. Coleman Connecting Parliament to the public via the Internet Information, Communication and Society, vol. 7, no. 1, 2004, pp. 1 22.
12. HC 1248, Public Petitions, Report from the Procedure Committee, London, HMSO, 2004.
13. HC 513, Public Petitions and Early Day Motions, Report from the Procedure Committee, London, HMSO, 2007.