Approach to multiple attribute decision making based on different intuitionistic preference structures

Dongnan Daxue Xuebao (Ziran Kexue Ban)/Journal of Southeast University (Natural Science Edition)

Volumn 37, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 706-710

  Dai, Yueqiang ^a   Xu, Zeshui ^b   Da, Qingli ^a  

^a Southeast University   (China)

^b PLA UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Incomplete intuitionistic judgment matrix; Intuitionistic judgment matrix; Multiple attribute decision making; Technology innovation

Indexed keywords

CALCULATIONS; INNOVATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MATRIX ALGEBRA; VECTORS;

GROUP DECISION MAKING; INTUITIONISTIC JUDGMENT MATRICES; INTUITIONISTIC PREFERENCE STRUCTURES; MULTIPLE ATTRIBUTE DECISION MAKING; PREFERENCE INFORMATION; TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION; WEIGHT VECTORS;

DECISION MAKING;

EID: 34547972654     PISSN: 10010505     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Saaty T L. The analytic hierarchy process [M]. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1980: 10-50.
2. Xu Zeshui. Study on the relation between two classes of scales in AHP [J]. Systems Engineering-Theory and Practice, 1999, 19(7): 97-101. (in Chinese)
3. Orlovsky S A. Decision-making with a fuzzy preference relation [J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1978, 1(2): 155-167.
4. Wang Yingming. An overview of priority methods of comparison matrix [J]. Journal of Decision Making and Decision Support Systems, 1995, 5(3): 101-114. (in Chinese)
5. Fan Zhiping, Jiang Yanping. An overview of priority methods of fuzzy judgment matrices [J]. Systems Engineering, 2001, 19(5): 12-18. (in Chinese)
6. Atanassov K T. Intuitionistic fuzzy sets [J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1986, 20(1): 87-96.
7. Szmidt E, Kacprzyk J. A consensus-reaching process under intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations [J]. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 2003, 18(7): 837-852.
8. Xu Zeshui. A survey of preference relations [J]. International Journal of General Systems, 2006, 35(2): 179-203.