Modelling cost-effectiveness of different vasectomy methods in India, Kenya, and Mexico

Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation

Volumn 5, Issue , 2007, Pages

  Seamans, Yancy ^a   Harner Jay, Claudia M ^a  

^a PATH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIRTH CONTROL; CAUTERIZATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH PROGRAM; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; INDIA; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KENYA; MEXICO; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SURGICAL TRAINING; VASECTOMY;

EID: 34547966890     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14787547     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1478-7547-5-8     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Nazerali H Thapa S Hays M Pathak LR Pandey KR Sokal DC Vasectomy effectiveness in Nepal: A retrospective study Contraception 2003 67 397-401 10.1016/S0010-7824(03)00028-3 12742564
2. Barone MA Irsula B Chen-Mok M Sokal DC Effectiveness of vasectomy using cautery BMC Urology 2004 4 10 503392 15260885 10.1186/1471-2490-4-10
3. Sokal D Irsula B Chen-Mok M Labrecque M Barone MA A comparison of vas occlusion techniques: Cautery more effective than ligation and excision with fascial interposition BMC Urology 2004 4 12 529470 15509302 10.1186/ 1471-2490-4-12
4. Sokal D Irsula B Hays M Chen-Mok M Barone MA Vasectomy by ligation and excision, with or without fascial interposition: A randomized controlled trial [ISRCTN77781689] BMC Medicine 2004 2 6 406425 15056388 10.1186/ 1741-7015-2-6
5. Wang D Contraceptive failure in China Contraception 2002 66 173-178 10.1016/S0010-7824(02)00334-7 12384206
6. Nakhaee N Mirahmadizadeh AR Gorji HA Mohammadi M Assessing the cost-effectiveness of contraceptive methods in Shiraz, Islamic Republic of Iran Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal 2002 8 55-63 15330561
7. Sonnenberg FA Burkman RT Hagerty CG Speroff L Speroff T Costs and net health effects of contraceptive methods Contraception 2004 69 447-459 10.1016/j.contraception.2004.03.008 15157789
8. Trussell J Leveque JA Koenig JD London R Borden S Henneberry J LaGuardia KD Stewart F Wilson TG Wysocki S. The economic value of contraception: A comparison of 15 methods American Journal of Public Health 1995 85 494-503 1615115 7702112
9. Mitchell MD Littlefield J Gutter S Costing of Reproductive Health Services International Family Planning Perspectives 1999 25 17-21 10.2307/2991867
10. Stover J Bertrand JT Shelton JD Empirically based conversion factors for calculating couple-years of protection Evaluation Review 2000 24 3-46 10747769
11. Sokal D McMullen S Gates D Dominik R A comparative study of the no scalpel and standard incision approaches to vasectomy in 5 countries. The Male Sterilization Investigator Team Journal of Urology 1999 162 1621-1625 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)68181-5 10524882
12. Janowitz B Bratt J Methods for Costing Family Planning Services United Nations Population Fund and Family Health International 1994
13. Deneux-Tharaux C Kahn E Nazerali H Sokal DC Pregnancy rates after vasectomy: A survey of US urologists Contraception 2004 69 401-406 10.1016/j.contraception.2003.12.009 15105063
14. Schwingl PJ Guess HA Safety and effectiveness of vasectomy Fertility and Sterility 2000 73 923-936 10.1016/S0015-0282(00)00482-9