The taxation of multinational firms in europe. On a recent report by the european commission;L'imposition des entreprises multinationales en europe à propos d'un rapport de la commission européenne

Revue Economique

Volumn 54, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 489-498

  Gérard, Marcel ^a  

^a Facultes Universitaires Catholiques de Mons   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547960298     PISSN: 00352764     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/3502923     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. HAUFLER A. et WOOTON I. [2001], « Regional tax coordination and foreign direct investment », CESifo Working Paper, 628.
2. COMMISSION européenne [2001a], Vers un marché intérieur sans entraves fiscales, COM (2001) 582 final, 23 octobre 2001.
3. COMMISSION européenne [2001b], Fiscalité des entreprises dans le marché intérieur, SEC (2001) 1681, 23 octobre 2001.
4. EIJFINGER S. et WAGNER W. [2001], « Tax Competition and International Diversifica- tion », communication aux congrès de l'IIPF, Linz, et de l'EEA, Lausanne, 36 p.
5. Gérard M. [2002a], « Tax competition, the distribution of MNE's ownership and the wage formation process », CESifo Working Paper, 631.
6. Gérard M. [2002b], « Interjurisdictional company taxation in Europe, the German reform and the new EU suggested direction », CESifo Working Paper, 636.
7. Gérard M. [2002c], « Neutralities and Non-Neutralities in International Corporate Taxation: An Evaluation of Possible and Recent Moves », Ifo-Studiën, 48, p. 533-554.
8. GOOLSBEE A. et MAYDEW E. [2000], « Coveting thy neighbor's manufacturing: the dilemma of state income apportionment », Journal of Public Economics, 75, p. 125-143.
9. HELLERSTEIN J. [1993], « Federal Income Taxation of Multinationals: Replacement of Separate Accounting with Formulary Apportionment », Tax Notes, 23 août 1993.
10. MCDANIEL P. [1994], « Formulary Taxation in the North American Free Trade Zone », Tax Law Review, 49, p. 691-744.
11. MCLURE C. et WEINER J. [2000], « Deciding whether the European Union should adopt formula apportionment of company income », dans CNOSSEN S. (ed.), Taxing Capital Income in the European Union, Issues and Options for Reform, Oxford University Press.
12. MUSGRAVE P. [2000], « Interjurisdictional Equity in Company Taxation: Principles and Applications to the European Union », dans CNOSSEN S. (ed.), Taxing Capital Income in the European Union, Issues and Options for Reform, Oxford University Press.
13. NIELSEN S. B., RAIMONDOS-MOELLER P. et SCHJELDERUP G. [2001], « Tax Spillovers under Separate Accounting and Formula Apportionment », EPRU (Economic Policy Research Unit) Paper 01-07, Copenhagen Business School, Avril.
14. NIELSEN S. B., RAIMONDOS-MOELLER P. et SCHJELDERUP G. [2003], « Formula appor- tionment and transfer pricing under oligopolistic competition », Journal of Public Economic Theory, 5, p. 417-436.
15. SORENSEN P. B. [2000], « The case for international tax co-ordination reconsidered », Economic Policy, 31, p. 429-461.
16. SORENSEN P. B. [2001], « International tax coordination: regionalism versus globalism », CESifo Working Paper, 483.
17. UNICE (Union of Industrial and Employers' Confederations of Europe) [2000], « Memo- randum on cross-border company taxation obstacles in the single market », 3 avril 2000.
18. WEINER J. [1999], « Using the experience in the U. S. states to evaluate issues in imple- menting formula apportionment at the international level », Office of Tax Analysis, Paper 83, U. S. Department of the Treasury, Washington, D. C.
19. WEINER J. [2001a], « The European Union and Formula Apportionment: Caveat Emptor », European Taxation, 10, p. 380-88.
20. WEINER J. [2002], « Would introducing formula apportionment in the European Union be a dream come true or the EU's worst nightmare? », Ifo-Studiën, 48, p. 519-532.