Claims for damages as a result of bile-duct injury during (laparoscopic) cholecystectomy;Letselschadeclaims als gevolg van galwegletsel bij een (laparoscopische) cholecystectomie

Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde

Volumn 151, Issue 31, 2007, Pages 1732-1736

  De Reuver, P R ^a   Rauws, E A J ^a   Lameris J S ^a   Sprangers, M A G ^a   Gouma, D J ^a  

^a ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BILE DUCT INJURY; BILLING AND CLAIMS; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEMOGRAPHY; HUMAN; LEGAL ASPECT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL LEAVE; PATIENT ATTITUDE; QUESTIONNAIRE; TERTIARY HEALTH CARE; UNIVARIATE ANALYSIS;

BILE DUCTS; CHOLECYSTECTOMY, LAPAROSCOPIC; CHOLELITHIASIS; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MALPRACTICE; MIDDLE AGED; ODDS RATIO; QUESTIONNAIRES; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 34547947232     PISSN: 00282162     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Flum DR, Cheadle A, Prela C, Dellinger EP, Chan L. Bile duct injury during cholecystectomy and survival in Medicare beneficiaries. JAMA. 2003;290:2168-73.
2. Boerma D, Rauws EAJ, Keulemans YCA, Bergman JJHGM, Obertop H, Huibregtse K, et al. Impaired quality of life 5 years after bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective analysis. Ann Surg. 2001;234:750-7.
3. Gouma DJ, Rauws EAJ, Keulemans YCA, Bergman JJHGM, Huibregtse K, Obertop H. Galwegletsel na laparoscopische cholecystectomie. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1999;143:606-11.
4. Kern KA. Malpractice litigation involving laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Cost, cause, and consequences. Arch Surg. 1997;132:392-7.
5. McLean TR. Risk management observations from litigation involving laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Arch Surg. 2006;141:643-8.
6. Sarmiento JM, Farnell MB, Nagorney DM, Hodge DO, Harrington JR. Quality-of-life assessment of surgical reconstruction after laparoscopic cholecystectomy-induced bile duct injuries: what happens at 5 years and beyond? Arch Surg. 2004;139:483-8.
7. Hubben JH, Christiaans I. Geen spectaculaire ontwikkeling van medische schadeclaims in Nederland: 1993/'01 in vergelijking met 1980/'90. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2004;148:1250-5.
8. Bergman JJHGM, Brink GR van den, Rauws EAJ, Wit L de, Obertop H, Huibregtse K, et al. Treatment of bile duct lesions after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Gut. 1996;38:141-7.
9. Zuidema T. De wurggreep van de medische schadeclaims. Arts en Auto. 2003;2:16-7.
10. Go PM, Schol F, Gouma DJ. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the Netherlands. Br J Surg. 1993;80:1180-3.
11. Gouma DJ, Go PM. Bile duct injury during laparoscopic and conventional cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 1994;178:229-33.
12. Marang-van de Mheen PJ, Kievit J. Geautomatiseerde registratie van complicaties door heelkundige afdelingen in Nederland: huidige stand van zaken. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2003;147:1273-7.
13. McLean TR. Monetary lessons from litigation involving laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am Surg. 2005;71:606-12.
14. Moore DE, Feurer ID, Holzman MD, Wudel LJ, Strickland C, Gorden DL, et al. Long-term detrimental effect of bile duct injury on health-related quality of life. Arch Surg. 2004;139:476-81.