Introducing structure management in automatic reference resolution: An XML-based approach

Information Processing and Management

Volumn 43, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 1808-1832

  Martínez González, M Mercedes ^a   de la Fuente, Pablo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VALLADOLID   (Spain)

Author keywords

Information extraction; Legislative documents; Reference extraction; Reference resolution; Structured documents; XML

Indexed keywords

DATA PROCESSING; INFORMATION ANALYSIS; PROBLEM SOLVING;

INFORMATION EXTRACTION; LEGISLATIVE DOCUMENTS; REFERENCE EXTRACTION; REFERENCE RESOLUTION; STRUCTURED DOCUMENTS;

XML;

EID: 34547943672     PISSN: 03064573     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ipm.2006.12.004     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Amer-Yahia, S., & Case, P. (2003). XQuery and XPath full-text use cases. Technical report, World Wide Web Consortium. http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-xmlquery-full-text-use-cases-2003214/.
2. In: André J., Furuta R., and Quint V. (Eds). Structured documents. The Cambridge series on electronic publishing Vol. 2 (1989), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New Rochelle, Melbourne
3. Arnold-Moore T. Connected to the law: Tasmanian legislation using EnAct. Journal of Information, Law and Technology 1 (2000)
4. Arnold-Moore T., Anderson P., and Sacks-Davis R. Managing a digital library of legislation. 2nd ACM international conference on digital libraries, ACM DL 1997 (1997), ACM Press, Philadelphia, PA, USA 175-183
5. Bergmark D., and Lagoze C. An architecture for automatic reference linking. 5th European conference on research and advanced technology for digital libraries, ECDL 2001, September 4-9, 2001. Lecture notes in computer science Vol. 2163 (2001), Springer-Verlag, Darmstadt, Germany 115-126
6. Boag, S., Chamberlin, D., Fernandez, M., Florescu, D., Robie, J., & Siméon, J. (2002). XQuery 1.0: An XML query language. Technical report, World Wide Web Consortium, http://www.w3.org/TR/xquery/.
7. Boer A., van Engers T., and Winkels R. Proposal for a Dutch legal XML standard. Lecture notes in computer science Vol. 2456 (2002), ACM 142-149
8. Bolioli A., Dini L., Mercatali P., and Romano F. For the automated mark-up of Italian legislative texts in XML. In: Bench Capon T.A.D.R.W. (Ed). Legal knowledge and information systems. JURIX 2002: 15th annual conference, December, 2002, Proceedings (2002), IOS Press, Amsterdam, Netherlands, London, UK 21-30
9. Buxton, S., & Rys, M. (2003). XQuery and XPath full-text requirements. Technical report, World Wide Web Consortium, http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/xmlquery-full-text-requirements.
10. Carlisle, D., Ion, P., Miner, R., & Poppelier, N. (2003). Mathematical Markup Language (MathML) Version 2.0 (2nd Ed.). Technical report, W3C, the World Wide Web Consortium, http://www.w3.org/TR/MathML2/.
11. Chamberlin D., Robie J., and Florescu D. Quilt: an XML query language for heterogeneous data sources. In: Sucio D., and Vossen G. (Eds). The World Wide Web and databases: third international workshop (WebDB 2000). Lecture notes in computer science Vol. 1997 (2001), Springer-Verlag, Dallas, Tex. 53-62
12. Clark, J., & DeRose, S. (1999). XML Path Language (XPath) version 1.0. W3C Recommendation 16 November 1999, W3C, the World Wide Web Consortium. http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/xpath.
13. Councill I.G., Giles C.L., Han H., and Manavoglu E. Automatic acknowledgement indexing: expanding the semantics of contribution in the citeseer digital library. In: Clark P., and Schreiber G. (Eds). Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on knowledge capture (K-CAP 2005) (2005), ACM, Banff, Alberta, Canada 19-26
14. Day M.-Y., Tsai T.-H., Sung C.-L., Lee C.-W., Wu S.-H., Ong C.-S., et al. A knowledge-based approach to citation extraction. In: Zhang D., Khoshgoftaar T.M., and Shyu M.-L. (Eds). Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE international conference on information reuse and integration, IRI-2005, August 15-17, 2005, Las Vegas Hilton, Las Vegas, NV, USA (2005), IEEE Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Society 50-55
15. Ding, Y., Chowdhury, G., & Foo, S. (1999). Template mining for the extraction of citation from digital documents. In Proceedings of the second Asian digital library conference (pp. 47-62).
16. Doggen, J. (1996). FORMEX V3L: Tagging the Laws. SGML Used for Complex Multilingual Legal Documents. In SGML'96: celebrating a decade of SGML, Boston, MA (pp. 107-114).
17. Dozier, C., Jackson, P., Guo, X. S., Chaudhary, M., & Arumainayagam, Y. (2003). Creation of an expert witness database through text mining. In ICAIL03 (pp. 177-184).
18. Dumitru, V., Colomitchi, A., Budulea, E., & Diaconescu, S. (2005). Legislative digital library: online and off-line database of laws. In A. Rauber, S. Christodoulakis, & A. M. Tjoa (Ed.), 9th European conference on research and advanced technology for digital libraries (ECDL 2005), Vienna, Austria (pp. 481-482).
19. European Communities (2003). Joint Practical Guide of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission for persons involved in the drafting of legislation within the Community institutions. Available from http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/en/about/techleg/index.html (visited the 02/02/2006), ISBN 92-894-4063-5.
20. Finke, N. (1997). TEI extensions for legal text. In Text encoding initiative tenth anniversary user conference, Providence, RI, USA.
21. Fuhr N., and Grobjohann K. XIRQL: An XML query language based on information retrieval concepts. ACM Transactions on Information Systems 22 2 (2004) 313-356
22. Furuta R. Concepts and models for structured documents. In: André J., Furuta R., and Quint V. (Eds). Structured documents (1989), Cambridge University Press 7-38
23. Grønbæk K., Sloth L., and Bouvin N.O. Open hypermedia as user controlled meta data for the Web. Computer Networks (Amsterdam, Netherlands: 1999) 33 1-6 (2000) 553-566
24. Grupo de Estudios de Técnica Legislativa (1989). Curso de tcnica legislativa GRETEL. Serie de Técnica Legislativa I. Centro de Estudios Constitucionales, Madrid.
25. Haider, G., Sjöberg, C. M., Quirchmay, G., & Sebald, V. (1996). The comparative part of the Corpus Legis Project - using SGML for intelligent information retrieval of legal documents. In A. Niku-Lari (Ed.), EXPERSYS-96, Artificial Intelligence Applications. Technology Transfer Series (pp. 181-186).
26. Heintz, J. D. (2002). Versioned hyperdocuments. In Extreme Markup Languages 2002, Montéral, Quebec, Canada.
27. Hemrich, M. (2002). A new face for each show: make up your content by effective variants engineering. In XML Europe 2002.
28. IFLA (1998). IFLA Study Group on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records: final report. Deutsche Bibliotek, Frankfurt-am-Main. http://www.ifla.org/VII/s13/frbr/frbr.pdf.
29. Lawrence S., Giles C.L., and Bollacker K. Digital libraries and autonomous citation indexing. IEEE Computer 32 6 (1999) 67-71
30. Lawson M., Kemp N., Lynch M., and Chowdhury G. Automatic extraction of citations from the text of english language patents: an example of template mining. Journal of Information Science 22 6 (1996) 423-436
31. Marchetti A., Megale F., Seta E., and Vitali F. Using XML as a means to access legislative documents: Italian and foreign experiences. ACM SIGAPP Applied Computing Review 10 1 (2002) 54-62
32. Martínez M.M., de la Fuente P., and Derniame J.-C. XML as a means to support information extraction from legal documents. International Journal of Computer Systems Science and Engineering 18 5 (2003) 263-277
33. Mets, G. D. (1996). Consleg Interleaf: SGML Applied in Legislation. In SGML'96: celebrating a decade of SGML, Boston.
34. Moens M.-F., Angheluta R., and Dumortier J. Generic technologies fonr single- and multi-document summarization. Information processing & Management 41 (2005) 569-586
35. Moens M.-F., Logghe M., and Dumortier J. Legislative databases: current problems and possible solutions. International Journal of Law and Information Technology 10 1 (2002) 1-22 Spring
36. Murata M. Extended path expressions for XML. Twentieth ACM SIGACT-SIGMOD-SIGART symposium on principles of database systems (2001), ACM, Santa Barbara, CA, USA
37. Murray-Rust P., and Rzepa H.S. Chemical Markup, XML, and the Worldwide Web. 1. Basic principles. Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Science 39 6 (1999) 928-942
38. Nahm, U. Y., & Mooney, R. J. (2001). Mining soft-matching rules from textual data. In Seventeenth international join conference on artificial intelligence (IJCAI-01), Seattle, WA (pp. 979-984).
39. Palmirani, M., & Brighi, R., (2002). An XML approach for italian legislation acts. In JURIX 2002 workshop on e-government, Institute of Advanced Legal Studies, London, UK.
40. Palmirani, M., Brighi, R., & Massini, M. (2003). Automated extraction of normative references in legal texts. In ICAIL (pp. 105-106).
41. Passin T.B. Explorer's guide to the Semantic Web (2004), Manning Publications Co.
42. Renear A., Dubin D., Sperberg-McQueen C., and Huitfeldt C. Towards a semantics for XML markup. ACM SAC 2002 (2002), ACM 119-126
43. Robie, J., Derksen, E., Fankhauser, P., Howland, E., Huck, G., Macherius, I., et al. (1999). XQL (XML query language). http://www.ibiblio.org/xql/xql-proposal.html.
44. Sjöberg C.M. Corpus legis: a legal document management project. International Journal of Law and Information Technology 5 1 (1997) 83-99
45. Sjöberg, C. M. (1997b). DTD development for the legal domain. In SGML Sweden'97, Stockhol, Sweden.
46. Sperberg-McQueen, C. M., & Burnard, L. (Eds.) (2002). Guidelines for text encoding and interchange. Published for the TEI Consortium by the Humanities Computing Unit, University of Oxford, 2002.
47. W3C HTML Working Group (2002). XHTML 1.0 The Extensible HyperText Markup Language (2nd Ed.). A reformulation of HTML 4 in XML 1.0. Technical report, W3C, the World Wide Web Consortium, W3C Recommendation 26 January 2000, revised 1 August 2002.
48. Zelenko D., Aone C., and Richardella A. Kernel methods for relation extraction. Journal of Machine Learning Research 3 (2003) 1083-1106