Document concept lattice for text understanding and summarization

Information Processing and Management

Volumn 43, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 1643-1662

  Ye, Shiren ^a   Chua, Tat Seng ^a   Kan, Min Yen ^a   Qiu, Long ^a  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Concept; Document concept lattice; Semantic; Text summarization

Indexed keywords

ABSTRACTING; OPTIMIZATION; PROGRAM DOCUMENTATION; SEMANTICS;

CONCEPT; LOCAL TOPICS; TEXT SUMMARIZATION;

QUALITY MANAGEMENT;

EID: 34547934448     PISSN: 03064573     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ipm.2007.03.010     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Agrawal R., and Srikant R. Fast algorithms for mining association rules in large databases. In: Bocca J.B., Jarke M., and Zaniolo C. (Eds). VLDB'94 Proceedings of the 20th international conference on very large data bases (1994), Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA, USA 487-499
2. Barzilay R., and Elhadad M. Using lexical chains for text summarization. Proceedings of the intelligent scalable text summarization workshop (ISTS'97) (1997), ACL, Madrid, Spain
3. Blair-Goldensohn, S., Evans, D., Hatzivassiloglou, V., McKeown, K., Nenkova, A., & Passonneau, R. (2004). Columbia University at DUC 2004, DUC.
4. Bosma, W., (2005). Extending answers using discourse structure. In: Saggion, H., & Minel, J.-L. (Eds.), RANLP workshop on crossing barriers in text summarization research. Incoma Ltd., Borovets, Bulgaria, pp. 2-9, ISBN 954-90906-8-X.
5. Carbonell, J., & Goldstein, J. (1998). The use of mmr, diversity-based reranking for reordering documents and producing summaries. In SIGIR. pp. 335-336.
6. Dang, H.T. (2005). Overview of DUC 2005. In DUC. URL http://duc.nist.gov/.
7. Dang, H.T. (2006). Overview of DUC 2006 (draft). In DUC.
8. Doran, W., Stokes, N., Carthy, J., & Dunnion, J. (2004). Comparing lexical chain-based summarisation approaches using an extrinsic evaluation. In Global WordNet Conference (GWC).
9. Erkan, G., & Radev, D. R. (2004b). The University of Michigan at DUC 2004. In DUC.
10. Erkan G., and Radev D.R. LexRank: Graph-based lexical centrality as salience in text summarization. Artificial Intelligence Research 22 (2004) 457-479
11. Harabagiu S., and Lacatusu F. Topic themes for multi-document summarization. SIGIR'05: Proceedings of the 28th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval (2005), ACM Press, New York, NY, USA 202-209
12. Hatzivassiloglou, V., Klavans, J. L., Holcombe, M. L., Barzilay, R., Kan, M.-Y., & McKeown., K. R. (2001). Simfinder: A flexible clustering tool for summarization. In Workshop on summarization in NAACL.
13. Hovy, E., Lin, C.-Y., & Zhou, L. (2005). Evaluating DUC 2005 using basic elements. In DUC.
14. Jagarlamudi, J., Pingali, P., & Varma, V. (2006). Query independent sentence scoring approach to DUC 2006. In DUC.
15. Katz S. Distribution of content words and phrases in text and language modelling. Natural Language Engineering 2 1 (1996) 15-60
16. Kummamuru K., Lotlikar R., Roy S., Singal K., and Krishnapuram R. A hierarchical monothetic document clustering algorithm for summarization and browsing search results. WWW'04: Proceedings of the 13th international conference on world wide web (2004), ACM Press, New York, NY, USA 658-665
17. Lesk, M. (1986). Automatic sense disambiguation using machine readable dictionaries: How to tell a pine cone from an ice cream cone. In SIGDOC. pp. 24-26.
18. Lin, D. (1998). An information-theoretic definition of similarity. In 15th International conference on machine learning pp. 296-304.
19. Lin, C.-Y., & Hovy, E. (2000a). The automated acquisition of topic signatures for text summarization, Vol. 1. Saarbrüken, pp. 495-500.
20. Lin, C.-Y., & Och, F. J. (2004). Automatic evaluation of machine translation quality using longest common subsequence and skip-bigram statistics. In ACL. URL http://www.isi.edu/~cyl/ROUGE/.
21. Lin C.-Y., and Hovy E. The automated acquisition of topic signatures for text summarization. Proceedings of the 18th conference on computational linguistics (2000), Association for Computational Linguistics, Morristown, NJ, USA 495-501
22. Mani I., and Maybury M.T. Advances in automatic text summarization (1999), The MIT Press
23. Mann W., and Thompson S. Rhetorical structure theory: Towards a functional theory of text organization. Text 8 3 (1988) 243-281
24. Marcu D. The rhetorical parsing of unrestricted natural language texts. In: Cohen P.R., and Wahlster W. (Eds). Proceedings of the thirty-fifth annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics and eighth conference of the European chapter of the association for computational linguistics (1997), Association for Computational Linguistics, Somerset, NJ 96-103
25. Marcu, D. (1998). To build text summaries of high quality, nuclearity is not sufficient, Stanford, CA, USA, pp. 1-8 (March 23-25).
26. *. International Journal of Lexicography 3 4 (1990) 235-244
27. Morris J., and Hirst G. Lexical cohesion computed by thesaural relations as an indicator of the structure of text. Computer Linguistics 17 1 (1991) 21-48
28. Naphade M.R., and Smith J.R. On the detection of semantic concepts at trecvid. MULTIMEDIA'04: Proceedings of the 12th annual ACM international conference on multimedia (2004), ACM Press, New York, NY, USA 660-667
29. Nguifo E.M., Duquenne V., and Liquiere M. Introduction - Concept latticebased theory, methods and tools for knowledge discovery in databases: Applications. Applied Artificial Intelligence 17 3 (2003) 177-180
30. Nobata, C., & Sekine, S. (2004). CRL/NYU summarization system at DUC-2004. In DUC.
31. Nomoto T., and Matsumoto Y. A new approach to unsupervised text summarization. SIGIR (2001), ACM Press, New York, NY, USA 26-34
32. Passonneau, R. J., Nenkova, A., McKeown, K., & Sigelman, S. (2005). Applying the pyramid method in DUC 2005. In DUC.
33. Radev D., Jing H., and Budzikowska M. Centroid-based summarization of multiple documents. Information Processing and Management 40 (2004) 919-938
34. Schiffman, B., Nenkova, A., & McKeown, K. (2002). Experiments in multi-document summarization. In HLT.
35. Silber H.G., and McCoy K.F. An efficient text summarizer using lexical chains. INLG'00: Proceedings of the first international conference on natural language generation (2000), Association for Computational Linguistics, Morristown, NJ, USA 268-271
36. Stumme G., Wille R., and Wille U. Conceptual knowledge discovery in databases using formal concept analysis methods. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (1998) 450-458
37. Voorhees E.M. Question answering in TREC. CIKM '01: Proceedings of the tenth international conference on information and knowledge management (2001), ACM Press, New York, NY, USA 535-537
38. Wang, H., Dubitzky, W., Düntsch, I., & Bell, D. (1999). Lattice machine approach to automated casebase design: Marrying lazy and eager learning. In IJCAI. pp. 254-259.
39. Ye, S., Qiu, L., Chua, T.-S., & Kan, M.-Y. (2005). NUS at DUC 2005: Understanding documents via concept links. In DUC.
40. Ye, S., Qiu, L., Chua, T.-S., & Kan, M.-Y. (2006). NUS at DUC 2006: Document concept lattice for summarization. In DUC.