Visual spatial disorientation: Revisiting the black hole illusion

Aviation Space and Environmental Medicine

Volumn 78, Issue 8, 2007, Pages 801-808

  Gibb, Randall W ^a,b  

^a Arizona State University   (United States)

^b UNITED STATES AIR FORCE ACADEMY   (United States)

Author keywords

Approach and landing accidents; Aviation safety; Aviation visual perception; Controlled flight into terrain; Featureless terrain illusion; Visual illusions

Indexed keywords

AIRCRAFT ACCIDENT; AIRPLANE PILOT; AVIATION; BLACK HOLE ILLUSION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DISORIENTATION; HUMAN; ILLUMINATION; ILLUSION; NIGHT VISION; REVIEW; SAFETY; SPATIAL ORIENTATION;

ACCIDENTS, AVIATION; AEROSPACE MEDICINE; CONFUSION; DARKNESS; HUMANS; OPTICAL ILLUSIONS;

EID: 34547931237     PISSN: 00956562     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (69)

1. Accident Investigation Board, United States Air Force. Executive summary; C-130E, Ahmed Al Jaber Air Base, Kuwait, 10 December, 1999. Retrieved 8 November 2006 from: http://usaf.aib.law.af.mil/10Dec99.pdf.
2. Air Force Manual 11-217, Vol. 1. Instrument flight procedures. U.S. Air Force; January 2005. Retrieved April 12, 2007, from: http://www.e-publishing.af. mil/pubfiles/af/11/afman11-217v1/afman11-217v1.pdf
3. Baird JC, Wagner M. Transformation theory of size judgment. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1991; 17:852-64.
4. Benson AD. Spatial disorientation - general aspects. In: Ernsting J, Nicholson AN, Rainford DJ, eds. Aviation medicine, 3rd ed. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1999:419-36.
5. Boeing. Statistical summary of commercial jet airplane accidents 2006 May. Retrieved 14 November 2006 from: http://boeing.com/news/techissues/pdf1. statsum.pdf.
6. Calvert ES. Visual aids for landing in bad visibility with particular reference to the transition from instrument to visual flight. Transactions of the Illumination Engineering Society of London 1950; 6:183-219.
7. Calvert ES. Visual judgments in motion. Journal of the Institute of Navigation 1954; 27:233-51.
8. Calvert ES. The theory of visual judgments in motion and its application to the design of landing aids for aircraft. Transactions of the Illumination Engineering Society of London 1957; 22:271-97.
9. Cocquyt P. Sensory illusions. Shell Aviation News 1953; 178:19-24.
10. Crassini B, Best CJ, Day RH. Misperceiving extents in the medial plane. In: Andre J, Owens DA, Harvey LO Jr, eds. Visual perception: the influence of H. W. Leibowitz. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2003:97-123.
11. Dekker SWA. Ten questions about human error: a new view of human factors and system safety. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc; 2004.
12. Flight Safety Foundation. Nonadherence to approach procedure cited in Falcon 20 CFIT in Greenland. Flight Safety Foundation: Accident Prevention 2004; 61:1-5.
13. Flight Safety Foundation. Freighter strikes trees during nighttime 'black-hole' approach. Flight Safety Foundation: Accident Prevention 2005; 62:1-7.
14. Galanis G, Jennings A, Beckett P. Runway width effects in the visual approach to landing. Int J Aviat Psychol 2001; 11:281-301.
15. Gibb RW. Visual perception in aviation: glide path performance during impoverished visual conditions [Dissertation]. Tempe, AZ: Arizona State University; 2007.
16. th Annual Meeting; 2006 Oct 16-20; San Francisco, CA. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomic Society; 2006:1661-5.
17. Gibson JJ. Perception of the visual world. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press; 1950.
18. Gillingham KK. The spatial disorientation problem in the United States Air Force. J Vestib Res 1992; 2:297-306.
19. Gogel WC. Equidistance tendency and its consequences. Psychol Bull 1965; 64:153-63.
20. Gray R. Vision in flying, driving, and sport. In: Jenkin MRM, Harris LR, eds. Seeing spatial form. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006:121-51.
21. Gurney D. Learning from experience: night VMC. Aviation Safety World 2006; 1:40-2.
22. Haber RN. Toward a theory of the perceived spatial layout of scenes. Computer. Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing 1981; 31:282-321.
23. Harris JL. What makes a visual approach non-visual. Airline Pilot 1977; May:14-9.
24. Hartman BO, Cantrell GK. Psychologic factors in "landing short" accidents. Flight Safety 1968; 2:26-32.
25. Hasbrook AH. Anatomy of a landing: cue by cue. Bus Com Aviat 1971; 29:54-60.
26. Hasbrook AH. The approach and landing: cues and clues to a safe touchdown. Bus Com Aviat 1975; 32:39-43.
27. Khatwa R, Helmreich RL. Analysis of critical factors during approach and landing in accidents and normal flight: data acquisition and analysis working group final report. Flight Safety Digest, Killers in Aviation: FSF task force presents facts about approach-and-landing and controlled-flight-into-terrain accidents; 1998; Nov-Dec, Jan-Feb:1-77.
28. Kraft CL. A psychophysical contribution to air safety: simulator studies of visual illusions in night visual approaches. In: Pick HL, Leibowitz HW, Singer JE, Steinschneider A, Stevenson HW, eds. Psychology: from research to practice. New York: Plenum Press; 1978:363-85.
29. Kraft CL, Elworth CL. Night visual approaches. Boeing Airliner 1969; Mar-Apr:2-4.
30. Kuhlman RL. Approach with care. Flying 1966; 78:88-90.
31. Lee RM. Death and deliverance. Toronto: Macfarlane Walter & Ross; 1993.
32. Lessard CS. Spatial disorientation: dealing with aeronautical illusions. IEEE Eng Med Biol 2000; 19:25-7.
33. Lewis MF, Mertens HW. Pilot performance during simulated approaches and landings made with various computer-generated visual glidepath indicators. Aviat Space Environ Med 1979; 50:991-1002.
34. Lintern G. An analysis of slant for guidance of landing approaches. Int J Aviat Psychol 2000; 10:363-76.
35. Lintern G, Walker MB. Scene content and runway breadth effects on simulated landing approaches. Int J Aviat Psychol 1991; 1:117-32.
36. Lyons TJ, Ercoline W, O'Toole K, Grayson K. Aircraft and related factors in crashes involving spatial disorientation: 15 years of U. S. Air Force data. Aviat Space Environ Med 2006; 77:720-3.
37. Matthews RSJ, Previc F, Bunting A. USAF spatial disorientation survey. Paper presented at the Research and Technology Organization and Human Factors and Medicine Symposium on Spatial Disorientation in Military Vehicles: Causes, Consequences and Cures; 2002 April; La Coruna, Spain. HFM-085, RTO-MP-086. Retrieved 23 April 2007 from: http://www.rta.nato.int/panel.asp?pg=2&panel= HFM&topic=pubs&O=#
38. Mayer CM, Mershon DH, Lim RW, Chipley MR, McAllister DF. Visual factors affecting touchdown point judgments during off-airport emergency landings. Int J Aviat Psychol 2006; 16:401-18.
39. McKee SP, Smallman HS. Size and speed constancy. In: Walsh V, Kulikowski J, eds. Perceptual constancy: why things look as they do. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1998:373-408.
40. Mertens HW. Comparison of the visual perception of a runway model in pilots and nonpilots during simulated night landing approaches. Aviat Space Environ Med 1978; 49:1043-55.
41. Mertens HW. Perceived orientation of a runway model in nonpilots during simulated night approaches to landing. Aviat Space Environ Med 1978; 49:457-60.
42. Mertens HW. Runway image shape as a cue for judgment of approach angle. Oklahoma City, OK: Office of Aviation Medicine, Federal Aviation Administration; 1979 July. Report No. FAA-AM-79-25. Retrieved November 17, 2006, from: http://www.faa.gov/library/reports/medical/oamtechreports/1970s/1979.
43. Mertens HW. Perception of runway image shape and approach angle magnitude by pilots in simulated night landing approaches. Aviat Space Environ Med 1981; 52:373-86.
44. Mertens HW, Lewis MF. Effect of different runway sizes on pilot performance during simulated night landing approaches. Aviat Space Environ Med 1982; 53:463-71.
45. Mertens HW, Lewis MF. Effects of approach lighting and variation in visible runway length on perception of approach angle in simulated night landings. Aviat Space Environ Med 1983; 54:500-6.
46. National Transportation Safety Board. Aircraft accident report, Pan American World Airways, Inc., Boeing 707-3215, N454A, Pago Pago, America Samoa, January 30,1974. Washington, DC: National Transportation Safety Board; 1977.
47. National Transportation Safety Board. Safety study: a review of flightcrew-involved, major accidents of U.S. air carriers, 1978 through 1990. Washington, DC: Department of Commerce, National Technical Information Service; 1994. Report No. NTSB/SS-94/01.
48. National Transportation Safety Board. Controlled flight into terrain, Korean Air Flight 801, Nimitz Hill, Guam; 1997. Washington, DC: National Transportation Safety Board; 1997.
49. National Transportation Safety Board. Safety recommendation. Washington, DC: NTSB; 1998. Report No. A-98-87.
50. National Transportation Safety Board. Collision with trees on final approach: Federal Express Flight 1478, Tallahassee FL; 2002. Washington, DC: NTSB; 2002.
51. Newman D. Eyeball error. Flight Safety Australia 2005; Oct:27-32.
52. Ostinga J. The wrong approach. Flight Safety Australia 2000; Jul-Aug:23-29.
53. Palmisano S, Gillam B. Visual perception of touchdown point during simulated landing. J Exp Psychol Appl 2005; 11:19-32.
54. Parmet AJ, Gillingham KK. Spatial orientation. In: DeHart RL, Davis JR, eds. Fundamentals of aerospace medicine. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams, & Wilkins; 2002:184-244.
55. Pendleton LD. The black hole approach: don't get sucked in! 2000. Retrieved 15 February 2006 from: http://www.avweb.com/news/airman/182402-1.html.
56. Perrone JA. Visual slant underestimation: a general model. Perception 1982; 11:641-54.
57. Perrone JA. Visual slant misperception and the 'black-hole' landing situation. Aviat Space Environ Med 1984; 55:1020-5.
58. Previc FH. Visual illusions in flight. In: Previc FH, Ercoline WR, eds. Spatial disorientation in aviation, progress in astronautics and aeronautics, vol 203. Reston, VA: AIAA; 2004:283-322.
59. Previc FH. Visual orientation mechanisms. In: Previc FH, Ercoline WR, eds. Spatial disorientation in aviation, progress in astronautics and aeronautics, vol 203. Reston, VA: AIAA; 2004:95-144.
60. Schiff B. Black hole approach. Boeing Airliner 1994; Jan-Mar:16-20.
61. th Symposium of the International Symposium on Aviation Psychology; Columbus, OH; 1991; 572-576.
62. Sipes WE, Lessard CS. A spatial disorientation survey of experienced instructor pilots. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag 2000; 19:35-42.
63. United States Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation regulations and aeronautical information manual, 2002 edition. Newcastle, WA: Aviation Supplies & Academics; 2001.
64. Vinacke WE. Illusions experienced by aircraft pilots while flying. J Aviat Med 1947; 18:308-25.
65. Wagenaar WA, Groeneweg J. Accidents at sea: multiple causes and impossible consequences. Int J Man Mach Stud 1987; 27:587-98.
66. Wickens CD. Engineering psychology and human performance. New York: HarperCollins Publisher; 1992.
67. Webster N. Spatial disorientation. Approach 2004; May-Jun:2-3.
68. Wilson D. Darkness increases risks of flight. Flight Safety Foundation Human Factors and Aviation Medicine 1999; 46:1-8.
69. Wulfeck JW, Weisz A, Raben MW. Vision in military aviation. Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH: Wright Air Development Center, United States Air Force; 1958. Report No. TR 1958 Nov; 58-399.