The influence of internote-interval variation of the advertisement call on the phonotactic behaviour in male Allobates femoralis (Dendrobatidae)

Amphibia Reptilia

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 227-234

  Göd, Mario ^a   Franz, Alexander ^a   Hödl, Walter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMPHIBIAN; CALLING BEHAVIOR; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; IDENTIFICATION METHOD; MATE RECOGNITION;

ADENOMERA HYLAEDACTYLA; ANURA; DENDROBATIDAE; EPIPEDOBATES FEMORALIS; EPIPEDOBATES HAHNELI; LEPTODACTYLIDAE;

EID: 34547927430     PISSN: 01735373     EISSN: 15685381     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1163/156853807780202468     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Amézquita, A., Castellanos, L., Hödl, W. (2005): Auditory matching of male Epipedobates femoralis (Anura: Dendrobatidae) under field conditions. Anim. Behav. 70: 1377-1386.
2. Drewry, G.E., Rand, A.S. (1983): Characteristics of an acoustic community: Puerto Rican frogs of the genus Eleutherodactylus. Copeia 1983: 941-953.
3. Duellman, W.E. (1967): Courtship isolating mechanisms in Costa Rican hylid frogs. Herpetologica 23: 169-183.
4. Duellman, W.E., Pyles, R.A. (1983): Acoustic resource partitioning in anuran communities. Copeia 1983: 639-649.
5. Fouquette, M.J. (1960): Isolating mechanisms in three sympatic treefrogs in the canal zone. Evolution 14:484-497.
6. Garcia-Rutledge, E.J., Narins, P.M. (200.1): Shared acoustic resources in an old world frog community. Herpetologica 57: 104-116.
7. Gerhardt, H.C. (1988): Acoustic properties used in call recognition by frogs and toads. In: The Evolution of the Amphibian Auditory System, p. 455-483. Fritzsch, B., Ryan, M.J., Wilczynski, W., Hetherington, T.E., Walkowiak, W., Eds, New York, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
8. Gerhardt, H.C., Doherty, J.A. (1988): Acoustic communication in the gray treefrog, Hyla versicolor: evolutionary and neurobiological implications. J. Comp. Physiol. A. 162: 261-278.
9. Gerhardt, H.C., Huber, F. (2002): Acoustic Communication in Insects and Anurans. Common Problems and Diverse Solutions. Chicago, Chicago Univ. Press.
10. Gottsberger, B., Gruber, E. (2004): Temporal partitioning of reproductive activity in a neotropical anuran community. J. Trop. Ecol. 20: 271-280.
11. Hödl, W. (1977): Call differences and calling site segregation in anuran species from Central Amazonian floating meadows. Oecologia 28: 351-363.
12. Hödl, W. (1982): Phyllobates femoralis (Dendrobatidae): Rufverhalten und akustische Orientierung der Männchen (Freilandaufnahmen). Scientific film Ctf 1788 BHWK Vienna, Austria.
13. Hödl, W (1987): Dendrobates femoralis (Dendrobatidae): a handy fellow for frog bioacoustics. In: Proceedings of the 4th Ordinary General Meeting of the Societas Europaea Herpetologica, p. 201-204. van Gelder, J.J., Strijbosch, H., Bergers, P.J.M., Eds, Nijmegen, Faculty of Sciences.
14. Hödl, W, Amézquita, A., Narins, P.M. (2004): The role of call frequency and the auditory papillae in phonotactic behavior in male dart-poison frogs Epipedobates femoralis (Dendrobatidae). J. Comp. Physiol. A 190: 823-829.
15. Lescure, J., Marty, C. (2000): Atlas des amphibiens de Guyane. Paris, Muséum National D'Histoire Naturelle.
16. Loftus-Hills, J.J., Littlejohn, M.J. (1971): Pulse repetition rate as the basis for mating call discrimination by two sympatric species of Hyla. Copeia 1971: 154-156.
17. Marty, C., Gaucher, P. (1999): Guide sonore des amphibiens anoures de Guyane. Édition CEBA.
18. Narins, P.M., Hödl, W., Grabul, D. (2003): Bimodal signal requisite for agonistic behavior in a dart-poison frog, Epipedobates femoralis. PNAS 100: 577-580.
19. Rand, S. (1988): An overview of anuran acoustic communication. In: The Evolution of the Amphibian Auditory System, p. 415-431. Fritzsch, B., Ryan, MJ., Wilczynski, W., Hetherington, T.E., Walkowiak, W., Eds, New York, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
20. Roithmair, M. (1992): Territoriality and male mating success in the dart-poison frog, Epipedobates femoralis (Dendrobatidae, Anura). Ethology 92: 331-343.
21. Ryan, M.J. (1988): Constraints and patterns in the evolution of anuran acoustic communication. In: The Evolution of the Amphibian Auditory System, p. 637-677. Fritzsch, B., Ryan, M.J., Wilczynski, W., Hetherington, T.E., Walkowiak, W., Eds, New York, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
22. Schlüter, A. (1980): Bio-akustische Untersuchungen an Dendrobatiden in einem begrenzten Gebiet des tropischen. Regenwaldes von Peru. (Amphibia: Salientia: Dendrobatidae). Salamandra 16: 149-161.
23. Schwartz, J.J. (1987): The importance of spectral and temporal properties in species and call recognition in a neotropical treefrog with a complex vocal repertoire. Anim.. Behav. 35: 340-347.
24. Schwartz, J.J., Wells, K.D. (1983): The influence of background noise on the behavior of a neotropical treefrog, Hyla ebraccata. Herpetologica 39: 121-129.
25. Schwartz, J.J., Wells, K.D. (1984): Interspecific acoustic interactions of the neotropical treefrog Hyla ebraccata. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 14: 211-224.
26. Vences, M., Kosuch, J., Boistel, R., Haddad, C.F.B., La Marca, E., Lötters, S., Veith, M. (2003): Convergent evolution of aposematic coloration in neotropical poison frogs: a molecular phylogenetic perspective. Org. Divers. Evol. 3: 215-226.
27. Wells, K.D. (1977): The social behavior of anuran amphibians. Anim. Behav. 25: 666-693.
28. Zelick, R.D., Narins, P.M. (1982): Analysis of acoustically evoked call suppression behaviour in a neotropical treefrog. Anim. Behav. 30: 728-733.
29. Zimmermann, H., Zimmermann, E. (1988): Etho-Taxonomie und zoogeographische Artengruppenbildung bei Pfeilgiftfröschen (Anura: Dendrobatidae). Salamandra 24: 125-160.