Comparison of factorial and scenario analysis methods for assessing uncertainty in the design of permeable reactive barriers

Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 102-110

  Painter, Brett D M ^a,b   Milke, Mark W ^c,d  

^a Lincoln University

^b Lincoln Environmental   (New Zealand)

^c CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONCENTRATION (PROCESS); HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY; OPTIMIZATION; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; PERMEABLE REACTIVE BARRIER; POTENTIAL INTERACTION; SCENARIO ANALYSIS;

WATER POLLUTION;

CONCENTRATION (PROCESS); HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY; OPTIMIZATION; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; WATER POLLUTION;

ANALYTICAL METHOD; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FACTOR ANALYSIS; HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY; NITRATE; REACTIVE BARRIER; REMEDIATION;

EID: 34547924117     PISSN: 10693629     EISSN: 17456592     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6592.2007.00152.x     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Bakr, A.A. 1976. Effects of spatial variations of hydraulic conductivity on groundwater flow. Ph.D. diss., Department of Hydrology, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, New Mexico.
2. Berthouex, P.M., and L.C. Brown. 2002. Statistics for Environmental Engineers, 2nd ed. Boca Raton, Florida : Lewis Publishers.
3. Blowes, D.W., W.D. Robertson, C.J. Ptacek, and C. Merkley. 1994. Removal of agricultural nitrate from tile-drainage effluent water using in-line bioreactors. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 15, no. 3 : 207 221.
4. Box, G.E.P., W.G. Hunter, and J.S. Hunter. 1978. Statistics for Experimenters: An Introduction to Design, Data Analysis and Model Building. New York : John Wiley and Sons.
5. Gavaskar, A.R., N. Gupta, B.M. Sass, R.J. Janosy, and J. Hicks. 2000. Design Guidance for Application of Permeable Reactive Barriers for Groundwater Remediation. Colombus, Ohio : Battelle Press.
6. Gorelick, S.M. 1983. A review of distributed parameter groundwater management modeling methods. Water Resources Research 19, no. 2 : 305 319.
7. Maskey, S., A. Jonoski, and D.P. Solomatine. 2002. Groundwater remediation strategy using global optimization algorithms. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 128, no. 6 : 431 440.
8. Ongley, E.D., and W.G. Booty. 1999. Pollution remediation planning in developing countries: Conventional modelling versus knowledge-based prediction. Water International 24, no. 1 : 31 38.
9. Painter, B.D.M. 2005. Optimization of permeable reactive barriers for the remediation of contaminated groundwater. Ph.D. diss., Natural Resource Engineering Department, Lincoln University, Canterbury, New Zealand. http://theses.lincoln.ac.nz/public/adt-NZLIU20061220.151030/index.html.
10. Painter, B.D.M. 2004. Reactive barriers: Hydraulic performance and design enhancements. Ground Water 42, no. 4 : 609 619.
11. Quinton, G.E., R.J. Buchanan Jr., D.E. Ellis, and S.H. Shoemaker. 1997. A method to compare groundwater cleanup technologies. Remediation 8, 7 16.
12. Schipper, L.A., and M. Vojvodić-Vuković. 2001. Five years of nitrate removal, denitrification and carbon dynamics in a denitrification wall. Water Resources 35, no. 14 : 3473 3477.
13. Smyth, D.J.A., S.G. Shikaze, and J.A. Cherry. 1997. Hydraulic performance of permeable barriers for in situ treatment of contaminated groundwater. Land Contamination and Reclamation 5, no. 3 : 131 137.
14. Starr, R.C., and J.A. Cherry. 1994. In situ remediation of contaminated groundwater: The funnel and gate system. Ground Water 32, no. 3 : 465 476.
15. U.S. EPA. 2001. Cost Analyses for Selected Groundwater Cleanup Projects: Pump and Treat Systems and Permeable Reactive Barriers. EPA 542-R-00-013. Washington, D.C. : U.S. Government Printing Office.
16. Xiang, Y., J.F. Sykes, and N.R. Thomson. 1996. Optimization of remedial pumping schedules for a ground-water site with multiple contaminants. Ground Water 34, no. 1 : 2 11.
17. Yoon, J., and C.A. Shoemaker. 1999. Comparison of optimization methods for ground-water bioremediation. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 125, no. 1 : 54 63.