Qualitative spectral evaluation of oesophagic voice;Evaluación espectral cualitativa de la voz esofágica

Acta Otorrinolaringologica Espanola

Volumn 57, Issue 7, 2006, Pages 319-323

  Vázquez De La Iglesia, Francisco ^a,d   Fernandez Gonzalez S ^b   De La Camara Gomez M ^c  

^a Universidad de La Coruña   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY CLINIC OF NAVARRA   (Spain)

^c Médico de Familia Hospital J Canalejo   (Spain)

^d NONE   (Spain)

Author keywords

Acoustic spectrography; Esophageal voice; Perceptual analysis; Yanagihara classification

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUDITORY DISCRIMINATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; LARYNGECTOMY; LARYNX CANCER; MALE; PHONATION; SPECTRAL SENSITIVITY; VOICE CHANGE; ESOPHAGUS SPEECH; MIDDLE AGED; REPRODUCIBILITY; SOUND DETECTION;

AGED; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOUND SPECTROGRAPHY; SPEECH, ESOPHAGEAL;

EID: 34547917633     PISSN: 00016519     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0001-6519(06)78719-2     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Shuster M, Lohscheller J, Kummer P, Hoppe U, Eyshold U, Rosanowski F. Quality of life in laryngectomees after prosthetic voice restoration. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica 2003;55:211-219.
2. Frederic W-B, Ernest A, Weymuller Jr, Coltrera MD, Fultran N. Quality of life after laryngectomy: are functional disabilities important? Head & Neck 1999;21:319-324.
3. Daou RA, Shultz JR, Remy H, Chan NT, Attia EL. Laryngectome study: clinical and radiologic correlates of esophageal voice. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1984;92:628-634.
4. Yanagihara N. Significance of harmonic changes and noise components in hoarseness. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1967; 30:531-541.
5. Núñez Batalla F, Suárez Nieto C. Espectrografí a Clínica de la Voz. Universidad de Oviedo. 1999.
6. Besson R, Grateau P, Pechard L. Acoustic study of esophageal voice. Comparison with laryngeal voice. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord) 1984;105:429-436.
7. Baken RJ, Orlikoff RF. Changes in vocal fundamental frequency at the segmental level: control during voiced fricatives. J Speech Hear Res 1988;31:207-11.
8. Rosique M, Ramón JL, Canteras M, Rosique L. Análisis discriminante aplicado a los formantes de las vocales castellanas en la fonación con prótesis y erigmofonía tras laringuectomía total. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp 2003;54:361-366.
9. Cervera T, Miralles JL, González-Álvarez J. Acoustical analysis of Spanish vowels produced by laryngectomized subjects.J Speech Lang Hear Res 2001;44:988-996.
10. Most T, Tobin Y, Mimran RC. Acoustic and perceptual characteristics of esophageal and tracheoesophageal speech production. J Commun Disord 2000; 33:165-180.
11. García-Tapia R, Fernández González S. 1986. Ponencia oficial del XVI congreso de la Sociedad Española de Otorrinolaringología y Patología Cérvico-Facial. Diagnóstico y tratamiento de los trastornos de la voz. Rafael García-Tapia Urrutia, Ignacio Cobeta Marco. Madrid 1986.Ed. Garsi® S.A. Págs 54-74.
12. Motta S, Galli I, DiRienzo L. Aerodynamic findings in esophageal voice. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2001;127:700-704.
13. Bertino G, Bellomo A, Miami C, Ferrero F, Staffieri A. Spectrographic Differences between Trachealela-Esophageal and Esophageal Voice. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica. 1996.
14. Bellandese MH, Lerman JW, Gilbert HR. An acoustic analysis of excellent female esophageal, tracheoesophageal, and laryngeal speakers. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2001;44:1315-1320.
15. Swisher WE. Oral pressures, vowel durations, and acceptability ratings of esophageal speakers. J Commun Disord 1980;13:171-181.
16. Max L, Steurs W, De Bruyn W. Vocal capacities in esophageal and tracheoesophageal speakers. Laryngoscope 1996;106:93-96.