Neuromuscular monitoring and postoperative residual curarization [2]

British Journal of Anaesthesia

Volumn 99, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 297-299

  Naguib, M ^a   Kopman, A F ^a   Ensor, J E ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NEUROMUSCULAR BLOCKING AGENT;

COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; HUMAN; HYPOTHESIS; LETTER; METHODOLOGY; MONITOR; NEUROMUSCULAR FUNCTION; PATIENT MONITORING; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE RESIDUAL CURARIZATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE DIAGNOSIS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; STUDENT T TEST; VALIDITY; CLINICAL TRIAL; MYOGRAPHY; PATIENT ASSESSMENT;

EID: 34547895466     PISSN: 00070912     EISSN: 14716771     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bja/aem190     Document Type: Letter

References (6)

1. Naguib M, Kopman AF, Ensor JE. Neuromuscular monitoring and postoperative residual curarisation: A meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth 2007, 98: 302-16
2. Eccles M, Freemantle N, Mason J. North of England evidence based guidelines development project: Methods of developing guideline for efficient drug use in primary care. Br Med J 1998; 316: 1232-5
3. Pedersen T, Moller AM. How to use evidence-based medicine in anaesthesiology. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2001; 45: 267-74
4. Kopman AF, Sinha N. Acceleromyography as a guide to anesthetic management a case report. J Clin Anesth 2003; 15: 145-8
5. Gotzsche PC. Methodology and overt and hidden bias in reports of 196 double-blind trials of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs in rheumatoid arthritis. Control Clin Trials 1989; 10: 31-56
6. Horlocker TT, Brown DR. Evidence-based medicine: Haute couture or the emperor's new clothes? Anesth Analg 2005; 100: 1807-10