A computational approach to modeling commodity markets

Computational Economics

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 125-142

  Atkins, Karla ^a   Marathe, Achla ^a   Barrett, Chris ^a  

^a VIRGINIA BIOINFORMATICS INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Agent based; Bilateral market; Computational framework; Matching order

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547894712     PISSN: 09277099     EISSN: 15729974     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10614-007-9090-6     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Arciniegas I., Barrett C., Marathe A. (2003). Assessing the efficiency of US electricity markets. Utilities Policy 11(2): 75-86
2. Arciniegas I., Marathe A. (2005). Important variables in explaining real-time peak price in the independent power market of ontario. Utilities Policy 3(1): 27-39
3. Atkins, K., Barrett, C., Homan, C., Marathe, A., Marathe, M., & Thite, S. (2004a). Marketecture: A simulation-based framework for studying experimental deregulated power markets. Los Alamos Technical Report, LAUR 04-2032.
4. Atkins, K., Barrett, C., Homan, C., Marathe, A., Marathe, M., & S. Thite. (2004b). Agent based economic analysis of deregulated electricity markets. 6th IAEE European Conference, Zurich, Switzerland.
5. Atkins, K., Homan, C., & Marathe, A. (2004c). Physical clearing mechanisms in power industry. To be presented at the IEEE Power Systems Conference and Exposition, New York City, New York.
6. Barrett, C. L., Beckman, R. J., Berkbigler, K. P., Bisset, K. R., Bush, B. W., Eubank, S., Hurford, J. M., Konjevod, G., Kubicek, D. A., Marathe, M. V., Morgeson, J. D., Rickert, M., Romero, P. R., Smith, L. L., Speckman, M. P., Speckman, P. L., Stretz, P. E., Thayer, G. L., & Williams, M. D. (1999) TRANSIMS (TRansportation ANalysis SIMulation System):, Overview, LA-UR-99-1658, Los Alamos National Laboratory.
7. Barrett C., Cook D., Faber V., Hicks G., Marathe A., Marathe M., Srinivasan A., Sussmann Y.J., Thornquist H. (2003). Experimental analysis of algorithms for bilateral-contract clearing mechanisms arising in deregulated power industry. Journal of Graph Algorithms and Applications 7(1): 3-31
8. Bogomolnaia A., Moulin H. (2004). Random matching and assignment under dichotomous preferences. Econometrica 72(1): 257-279
9. Bunn D., Oliveira F.S. (2001). Agent-based simulation - an application to the new electricity trading arrangements of England and Wales. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 5(5): 493-503
10. Falk A., Fehr E. (2003). Why labour market experiments?. Labour Economics 10: 399-406
11. Huberman B.A., Glance N.S. (1993). Evolutionary games and computer simulations. Proceedings of National Academy Science 90: 7716-7718
12. Huberman, B.A., Hogg, T. (1995). Distributed computation as an economic system. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 141-152
13. Judd, K. (2005) Computationally intensive analysis in economics. Handbook of computational economics, (Vol. 2). North Amsterdam.
14. Klaus B., Klijn F. (2006). Procedurally fair and stable matching. Economic Theory 27(2): 431-447
15. Lin, M. W. (1998). A Model and simulation of competitive electric power systems, Ph.D Dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin. www.ece.utexas.edu/baldick/papers/compmodel.pdf
16. Li C., Giampapa J.A., Sycara K. (2006). Bilateral negotiation decisions with uncertain dynamic outside options. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C: Special Issue on Game-theoretic Analysis and Stochastic Simulation of Negotiation Agents 36(1): 31-44
17. MacKie-Mason, J. J., & Wellman, M. (2005). Automated markets and trading agents. Handbook of computational economics, (Vol. 2). North-Holland.
18. Miller M.S., Drexler K.E. (1988). Comparative ecology: A computational perspective. In Huberman B. (eds) The Ecology of Computation. Amsterdam, Elsevier Science Publishers
19. Mozumder P, Marathe A. (2004). Implications of an integrated market for tradable renewable energy contracts. Ecological Economics 49(3): 259-272
20. Ramey, G., & Watson, J. (2001). Bilateral trade and opportunism in a matching market. Contributions to Theoretical Economics, 1 (1), Article 3.
21. Roth A. E. (1999). Game theory as a tool for market design. http://kuznets.fas.harvard.edu/aroth/alroth.html#vshort
22. Roth A. E. (2005). Matching and allocation in medicine and health care. Building a better delivery system: A new engineering/health care partnership, National Academy of Engineering and Institute of Medicine, National Academies Press, pp. 237-239.
23. Roth A.E., Vande V., John H. (1990). Random paths to stability in two-sided matching. Econometrica 58(6): 1475-1480
24. Rust J., Miller J.H., Palmer R. (1994). Characterizing effective trading strategies: Insights from a computerized double auction tournament. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 18: 61-96
25. Sargent T.J. (1993). Bounded rationality in macroeconomics. The Arne Ryde memorial lectures. Oxford U.K., Clarendon Press
26. Smith V.L. (1962). An experimental study of competitive market behavior. The Journal of Political Economy 70(2): 111-137
27. Spulber D.F. (2002). Market microstructure and incentives to invest. Journal of Political Economy 110(2): 352-381