Selection of variables using factorial discriminant analysis for the state identification of an anaerobic UASB-UAF hybrid pilot plant, fed with winery effluents

Water Science and Technology

Volumn 56, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 139-145

  Castellano, M ^a   Ruiz Filippi, G ^b   Gonzalez W ^a   Roca, E ^a   Lema, J M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SANTIAGO DE COMPOSTELA   (Spain)

^b PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE VALPARAÍSO   (Chile)

Author keywords

Anaerobic digestion; FDA; Process state identification; UASB UAF reactor; Winery effluents

Indexed keywords

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION; CHEMICAL REACTORS; CONTROL SYSTEMS; EFFLUENT TREATMENT; MONITORING; STATISTICAL METHODS;

ANAEROBIC WASTEWATER TREATMENT; PROCESS STATE IDENTIFICATION;

WASTEWATER TREATMENT;

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION; CHEMICAL REACTORS; CONTROL SYSTEMS; EFFLUENT TREATMENT; MONITORING; STATISTICAL METHODS; WASTEWATER TREATMENT;

ANOXIC CONDITIONS; BIOREACTOR; CONTROL SYSTEM; EFFLUENT; INDUSTRIAL WASTE; POLLUTION MONITORING; TOXIC MATERIAL; WASTE TREATMENT;

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION; CLASSIFICATION; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROL SYSTEM; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; EFFLUENT; FACTORIAL DESIGN; INDUSTRIAL WASTE; POLLUTION MONITORING; QUALITY CONTROL; STANDARDIZATION; STATISTICAL PARAMETERS; UPFLOW REACTOR; WASTE WATER MANAGEMENT; WINE INDUSTRY;

AEROBIOSIS; BIODEGRADATION, ENVIRONMENTAL; INDUSTRIAL WASTE; WASTE DISPOSAL, FLUID; WATER PURIFICATION; WINE;

EID: 34547879296     PISSN: 02731223     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.2166/wst.2007.482     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Bernard, O., Chachuat, B., Hé1ias, A., Le Dantec, B., Sialve, B., Steyer, J.-P., Lardon, L., Neveu, P., Lambert, S., Ratini, P., Frattesi, S., Lema, J., Roca, E., Ruiz, G., Rodriguez, J., Franco, A., Vanrolleghem, P., Zaher, U., De Pauw, D.J.W., De Neve, K., Lievens, K., Dochain, D., Schoefs, O., Fibrianto, H., Farina, R., Alcaraz Gonzalez, V., Gonzalez Alvarez, V., Lemaire, P., Martinez, J.A., Duclaud, O. and Lavigne, J.F. (2005). TELEMAC: an integrated system to remote monitor and control anaerobic wastewater treatment plants through the internet. Water Sci. Technol., 52(1/2), 457-464.
2. Buffière, P., Steyer, J.P. and Moletta, R. (1995). A new control strategy for highly loaded anaerobic digestion processes. In: Proceedings of International Workshop on Monitoring and Control of Anaerobic Digestion Process, December 6-7th, Narbonne, France, pp. 85-89.
3. De Neve, K., Lievens, K., Steyer, J.P. and Vanrolleghem, P. (2004). Development of an on-line titrimetric analyser for the determination of volatile fatty acids, bicarbonate, and alkalinity [Telemac contribution #7]. 10th Congress on Anaerobic Digestion (AD10-2004), Montreal, Canada, August 29-September 23, pp. 1341-1344.
4. Hickey, R. and Switzenbaum, M. (1990). Behavior of carbon monoxide as a trace component of anaerobic digester gases and methanogenesis from acetate. Environ. Sci. Technol., 24(11), 1642-1648.
5. Hickey, R. and Switzenbaum, M. (1991). The response and utility of hydrogen and carbon monoxide as process indicators of anaerobic digesters subject to organic and hydraulic overloads. J. Water Pollut. Control Federation, 63(2), 129-140.
6. Hickey, R., Vanderwielen, J. and Switzenbaum, M. (1987). The effect of organic toxicants on methane production and hydrogen gas levels during the anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge. Water Res., 21(11), 1417-1427.
7. Hickey, R., Vanderwielen, J. and Switzenbaum, M. (1989). The effect of heavy metals on methane production and hydrogen and carbon monoxide levels during batch anaerobic sludge digestion. Water Res., 23(2), 207-218.
8. Hickey, R., Wu, W., Veiga, M. and Jones, R. (1991). Start-up, operation, monitoring and control of high-rate anaerobic systems. Water Sci. Technol., 24(8), 207-255.
9. Huang, Y., Huang, G., Chou, S. and Cheng, S. (2000). Hydrogen as a quick indicator of organic shock loading in UASB. Water Sci. Technol., 42(3/4), 43-50.
10. Kidby, D. and Nedwell, D. (1991). An investigation into the suitability of biogas hydrogen concentration as a performance monitor for anaerobic sewage sludge digester. Water Res., 25(8), 1007-1012.
11. Marsili-Libelli, S. and Beni, S. (1996). Shock load modelling in the anaerobic digestion process. Ecol. Model., 84, 215-232.
12. Peña, D. (2002). Multivariate data análisis (in Spanish), McGraw Hill-Interamericana de España S.A.U.
13. Pullammanappallil, P., Chynoweth, D.P., Lyberatos, G. and Svoronos, S.A. (2001). Stable performance of anaerobic digestion in the presence of a high concentration of propionic acid. Bioresour. Technol., 78, 165-169.
14. Ripley, L., Boyle, W. and Converse, I. (1986). Improved alkalimetric monitoring for anaerobic digestion of high-strength wastes. J. Water Pollut. Control Federation, 58(5), 406-411.
15. Ruiz, G., Rodriguez, J., Baeza, J., Roca, E. and Lema, J.M. (2001). Advanced monitoring and supervision of an anaerobic pilot plant. In Proceedings of the Anaerobic Digestion World Congress (AD9), (Vol. 2)., van Velsen, A.F. and Verstraete, W. (eds.), Technologisch Instituut vzw, Antwerpen, pp. 207-210.
16. Ruiz, G., Roca, E. and Lema, J.M. (2002). Variables selection for process state identification of non steady state data of an anaerobic digester (In Spanish), Proceedings of the VII Latinamerican workshop and seminar on anaerobic digestion. Mérida-México, (Vol. 2), pp. 166-172.
17. Switzenbaum, M., Giraldo, E. and Hickey, R. (1990). Monitoring of the anaerobic methane fermentation process. Enzyme Microbial Technol., 12, 722-730.