Crosslinguistic influence versus intralingual interference: A pedagogically motivated investigation into the acquisition of the present perfect

System

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 368-387

  Lim, Jason Miin Hwa ^a  

^a UNIVERSITI MALAYSIA SABAH   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

Applied educational linguistics; Grammar; Interference; Second language acquisition; Tenses

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547864990     PISSN: 0346251X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.system.2007.03.002     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Aitken R. Teaching Tenses (1992), Thomas Nelson & Sons Ltd., Surrey
2. Azar B.S. Understanding and Using English Grammar (1999), Pearson Education, New York
3. Corder S.P. Introducing Applied Linguistics (1973), Penguin Group, London
4. Duskova L. On sources of errors in foreign language learning. IRAL 7 1 (1979) 11-36
5. Ellis R. Item versus system learning: explaining free variation. Applied Linguistics 20 4 (1999) 460-480
6. Ellis R. Principles of instructed language learning. Asian EFL Journal 7 3 (2005) 9-24
7. Ellis E., Basturkmen H., and Loewen S. Preemptive focus on form in the ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly 35 3 (2001) 407-432
8. Gregg K. The variable competence model of second language acquisition and why it isn't. Applied Linguistics 11 (1990) 364-383
9. Leech G., Deuchar M., and Hoogenraad R. English Grammar for Today: New Introduction (1982), Macmillan Publishers Ltd., London
10. Lim J.M.H. Difficulty in the acquisition of the past perfect tense. Manu 5 (2001) 26-47
11. Lim J.M.H. The learning of the past progressive tense: an investigation into target language interference and crosslinguistic influence. Manu 7 (2002) 63-83
12. Lim J.M.H. Target language interference in the acquisition of the past simple tense. In: James J. (Ed). Grammar in the Language Classroom: Changing Approaches and Practices (2003), SEAMEO Regional Language Centre (RELC), Singapore 254-293
13. Lim J.M.H. Interference in the second language acquisition of the present simple tense. Asian Journal of English Language Teaching (Hong Kong) 13 (2003) 1-28
14. Lim J.M.H. Associating interference with strategy instruction: an investigation into the learning of the present continuous. Asian EFL Journal (Korea) 8 2 (2006) 55-75
15. Long M. A role for instruction in second language acquisition: task-based language teaching. In: Hyltenstam K., and Pienemann M. (Eds). Modelling and Assessing Second Language Acquisition (1985), Multilingual Matters, Clevedon, England 77-99
16. Long M. Focus on form: a design feature in language teaching methodology. In: de Bot K., Ginsberg R., and Kramsch C. (Eds). Foreign Language Research in Cross-Cultural Perspective (1991), John Benjamin, Amsterdam 39-52
17. McBurney D.H. Research Method. third ed. (1994), Brooks/Cole Publishing Co., Belmont
18. Norris J., and Ortega L. Effectiveness of L2 instruction: a research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language learning 50 (2000) 417-528
19. Pienemann M. Is language teachable? Psycholinguistic experiments and hypotheses. Applied Linguistics 10 1 (1989) 52-79
20. Quirk R., Greenbaum S., Leech G., and Svartvik J. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language (1985), Longman Group Limited, London
21. Schachter J. In search of systematicity in interlanguage production. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 8 (1986) 119-134
22. Schmidt R. Deconstructing consciousness in search of useful definitions for applied linguistics. AILA Review 11 (1994) 11-26
23. Selinker L. Rediscovering Interlanguage (1992), Longman Group Ltd., London
24. Thomson A.J., and Martinet A.V. A Practical English Grammar. fourth ed. (1986), Oxford University Press, Oxford
25. Tickoo A. On the use of 'then'/'after that' in the marking of chronological order: insights from Vietnamese and Chinese learners of ESL. System 30 (2002) 107-124
26. Towell R., Hawkins R., and Bazergui N. Systematic and non-systematic variability in advanced language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 15 (1993) 439-460