Strange bedfellows: The tensions of coerced treatment

Criminal Justice Policy Review

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 260-273

  Whiteacre, Kevin W ^a  

^a Salvation Army Correctional Services Program   (United States)

Author keywords

Coercion; Drug treatment court; Juvenile; Sanctions; Therapeutic jurisprudence; Treatment

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547845281     PISSN: 08874034     EISSN: 15523586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0887403407300088     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Anderson, E., Levine, M., Sharma, A., Ferretti, L., Steinberg, K., & Wallace, L. (1996). Coercive use of mandatory reporting in therapeutic relationships. In D. B. Wexler and B. J. Winick (Eds.), Law in a therapeutic key. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
2. Anglin, M.D., & Hser, Y. (1990). Treatment of drug abuse. In M. Tonry & J. Q. Wilson (Eds.), Drugs and crime. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
3. Braithwaite, J. (1999). Crime, shame and reintegration. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
4. Cosden, M., Basch, J.E., Campos, E., Greenwell, A., Barazani, S., & Walker, S. (2006). Effects of motivation and problem severity on court-based drug treatment. Crime & Delinquency, 52, 4, 599-618.
5. Deschenes, E.P., & Greenwood, P.W. (1994). Maricopa County's drug court: An innovative program for first time offenders on probation, California: RAND.
6. Farabee, D., Prendergast, M., & Anglin, M.D. (1998). The effectiveness of coerced treatment for drug-abusing offenders. Federal Probation, 62, 3-10.
7. Friedman, A.S., Granick, S., & Kreisher, C. (1994). Motivation of adolescent drug abusers for help and treatment. Journal of Child and Adolescent Substance Abuse, 3, 69-88.
8. Goldkamp, J.S., White, M.D., & Robinson, J.B. (2001). Do drug courts work? Getting inside the drug court black box. Journal of Drug Issues, 31, 27-72.
9. Hora, P.F., Schma, W.G., & Rosenthal, J.T.A. (1999). Therapeutic jurisprudence and the drug treatment court movement: Revolutionizing the criminal justice system's response to drug abuse in America. Notre Dame Law Review, 74, 439-538.
10. Marlowe, D.B., & Kirby, K.C. (1999). Effective use of sanctions in drug courts: Lessons from behavioral research. National Drug Court Institute Review, 2, 1-32.
11. McColl, W.D. (2002). Theory and practice in the Baltimore city drug treatment court. In J. L. Nolan (Ed.), Drug courts in theory and in practice. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
12. Miller, A. (1994). The drama of the gifted child. New York: Basic Books, a Division of HarperCollins Publishers, Inc.
13. National Association of Drug Court Professionals (1997). Defining drug courts: The key components. Drug Courts Program Office, Office of Justice Programs. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
14. Neuman, W.L. (2000). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches (4 th Edition). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
15. Nolan, J.L., Jr. (2001). Reinventing justice: The American drug court movement. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
16. Satel, S.L. (1998). Observational study of courtroom dynamics in selected drug courts. National Drug Court Institute Review, 1, 43-72.
17. Schwebel, R. (2002). Drug courts and adolescents. Counselor, February, 14-19.
18. Smith, K.J., Subich, L.M., & Kalodner, C. (1995). The transtheoretical model's stages and processes of change and their relation to premature termination. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 42, 34-39.
19. Tauber, J.S. (1993). A judicial primer on unified drug courts and court-ordered drug rehabilitation programs (presented at the California Continuing Studies Program Dana Point), California, August 20.
20. Tauber, J.S. (1994). Drug courts: A judicial manual. CJER Journal, California Center for Judicial and Education Research, Summer.
21. Taxman, F.S., & Bouffard, J.A. (2005). Treatment as part of drug court: The impact on graduation rates. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 42, 1, 23-50.
22. United States Government Accountability Office (2005). Adult drug courts: Evidence indicates recidivism reductions and mixed results from other outcomes, Report to Congressional Committees. http://www.gao.gov.new.items/do5219.pdf.
23. White House (2002). National drug control strategy. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.