Computer-Assisted Mammography Feedback Program (CAMFP). An Electronic Tool For Continuing Medical Education

Academic Radiology

Volumn 14, Issue 9, 2007, Pages 1036-1042

  Urban, Nicole ^a   Longton, Gary M ^a   Crowe, Andrea D ^c   Drucker, Mariann J ^b   Lehman, Constance D ^c   Peacock, Susan ^c   Lowe, Kimberly A ^a   Zeliadt, Steve B ^a   Gaul, Marcia A ^a  

^a Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center   (United States)

^b Seattle Radiologists   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast radiography; computer; continuing medical education; mammography; radiologist; women

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIVARIATE ANALYSIS; BREAST; COMPUTER ASSISTED IMPEDANCE TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTINUING EDUCATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW; MAMMOGRAPHY; MEDICAL EDUCATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGIST; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

COMPUTER-ASSISTED INSTRUCTION; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, CONTINUING; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; MAMMOGRAPHY; RADIOLOGY; SOFTWARE; TEACHING; WASHINGTON;

EID: 34547843629     PISSN: 10766332     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2007.05.018     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Pepe M.S., et al. Design of a study to improve accuracy in reading mammograms. J Clin Epidemiol 50 (1997) 1327-1338
2. Elmore J., Wells C., and Howard D. Does diagnostic accuracy in mammography depend on radiologists' experience?. J Womens Health 7 (1998) 443-449
3. Ciatto S., et al. Proficiency test for screening mammography: results for 117 volunteer Italian radiologists. J Med Screen 6 (1999) 149-151
4. Rutter C.M., and Taplin S. Assessing mammographers' accuracy: a comparison of clinical and test performance. J Clin Epidemiol 53 (2000) 443-450
5. Smith-Bindman R., et al. Physician predictors of mammographic accuracy. J Natl Cancer Inst 97 (2005) 358-367
6. Beam C.A., Conant E.F., and Sickles E.A. Association of volume and volume-independent factors with accuracy in screening mammogram interpretation. J Natl Cancer Inst 95 (2003) 282-290
7. Mammography Quality Standards Act Public Law 101-359, 1992. Amended 1997. Fed Reg (1997) October 28
8. Linver M., and Newman J. MQSA: the final rule. Radiol Technol 70 (1999) 338-353
9. Berg W.A., et al. Does training in Breast Imaging and Reporting System (BI-RADS) improve biopsy recommendations or feature analysis agreement with experienced breast imagers at mammography?. Radiology 224 (2002) 871-880
10. Nass S., and Ball J. Improving breast imaging quality standards. NCPB Committee on Improving Mammography Quality Standards, Institute of Medicine and National Research Council of the National Academies (2005), National Academy Press, Washington, DC 24-71
11. Thomson O'Brien M.A., et al. Audit and feedback versus alternative strategies: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2000) CD000260
12. Robertson M.K., Umble K.E., and Cervero R.M. Impact studies in continuing education for health professions: update. J Contin Educ Health Prof 23 (2003) 146-156
13. LoRusso A.P., Bassignani M.J., and Harvey J.A. Enhanced teaching of screening mammography using an electronic format. Acad Radiol 13 (2006) 782-788
14. Pisano E.D., and Yaffe M.J. Digital mammography. Radiology 234 (2005) 353-362
15. Pisano E.D., and McLelland R. Implementation of breast cancer screening. Curr Opin Radiol 3 (1991) 579-587
16. Box G. A general distribution theory for a class of likelihood criteria. Biometrika 36 (1949) 317-346
17. Ikeda D., et al. Analysis of 172 subtle findings on prior normal mammograms in women with breast cancer detected at follow-up screening. Radiology 226 (2003) 494-503
18. Pisano E.D., et al. Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med 353 (2005) 1773-1783
19. Rosenberg R.D., et al. Effect of variations in operational definitions on performance estimates for screening mammography. Acad Radiol 7 (2000) 1058-1068
20. Institute of Medicine. To err is human: building a safer health system (1999), National Academy Press, Washington, DC