Limitations in the national cancer institute antitumor drug screening database for evaluating hormesis [1]

Toxicological Sciences

Volumn 98, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 599-601

  Crump, Kenny S ^a  

^a ENVIRON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENT;

CELL GROWTH; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONCENTRATION RESPONSE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; DATA BASE; DRUG SCREENING; EXPERIMENT; HORMESIS; LETTER; NONHUMAN; SIMULATION; YEAST; YEAST CELL;

ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENTS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATABASES, FACTUAL; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH (U.S.); NO-OBSERVED-ADVERSE-EFFECT LEVEL; UNITED STATES; YEASTS;

EID: 34547843545     PISSN: 10966080     EISSN: 10960929     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfm135     Document Type: Letter

References (3)

1. Calabrese, E. J., Staudenmayer, J. W., Stanek, E. J., III, and Hoffmann, G. R. (2006). Hormesis outperforms threshold model in National Cancer Institute antitumor drug screening database. Toxicol. Sci. 94 2), 368-378.
2. Faessel, H. M., Levasseur, L. M., Slocum, H. K., and Greco, W. R. (1999). Parabolic growth patterns in 96-well plate cell growth experiments. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. 35, 270-278.
3. Loeve, M. (1963). Probability Theory. D. Van Nostrand Company, Inc., Princeton, NJ.