The regression effect as a neglected source of bias in nonrandomized intervention trials and systematic reviews of observational studies

Evaluation and the Health Professions

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 254-265

  Weeks, Douglas L ^a  

^a WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Case control study; Cohort study; Evidence based practice; Internal validity; Meta analysis; Statistical regression; Systematic review

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EPIDEMIOLOGY; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMAN; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICS;

BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMANS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 34547839752     PISSN: 01632787     EISSN: 15523918     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0163278707304043     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Bland, J.M., & Altman, D.G. (1994). Regression towards the mean. British Medical Journal, 308, 1499.
2. Campbell, D.T., & Kenny, D.A. (1999). A primer on regression artifacts. New York: Guilford.
3. Davis, C.E. (1976). The effect of regression to the mean in epidemiologic and clinical studies. Journal of Epidemiology, 104, 493-498.
4. Deeks, J.J., Dinnes, J., D'Amico, R., Sowden, A.J., Sakarovitch, C., Song, F., et al. (2003). Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies. Health Technology Assessment, 7, 1-173.
5. Des Jarlais, D.C., Lyles, C., Crepaz, N., & the TREND Group. (2004). Improving the reporting quality of nonrandomized evaluations of behavioral and public health interventions: The TREND statement. American Journal of Public Health, 94, 361-366.
6. Ederer, F. (1972). Serum cholesterol: Effects of diet and regression toward the mean. Journal of Chronic Disability, 25, 277-289.
7. Eschwege, E., Charles, M.A., Simon, D., Thibult, N., Balkau, B., & the Paris Prospective Study. (2001). Reproducibility of the diagnosis of diabetes over a 30-month follow-up: The Paris Prospective Study. Diabetes Care, 24, 1941-1944.
8. Fogari, R., Corradi, L., Zoppi, A., Lusardi, P., & Poletti, L. (1996). Repeated office blood pressure controls reduce the prevalence of white-coat hypertension and detect a group of white-coat normotensive patients. Blood Pressure Monitoring, 1, 51-54.
9. Galton, F. (1886). Regression toward mediocrity in hereditary stature. Journal of the Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, 15, 246-263.
10. Glass, G.V., & Hopkins, K.D. (1996). Statistical methods in education and psychology (3 rd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
11. Hopkins, K.D. (1969). Regression and the matching fallacy in quasi-experimental research. Journal of Special Education, 3, 329-336.
12. Isojvri, J.I.T., Rtty, J., Myllyl, V.V., Knip, M., Koivunen, R., Pakarinen, A.J., et al. (1998). Valproate, lamotrigine, and insulin-mediated risks in women with epilepsy. Annals of Neurology, 43, 446-451.
13. Juni, P., Witschi, A., Bloch, R., & Egger, M. (1999). The hazards of scoring the quality of clinical trials for meta-analysis. Journal of the American Medical Association, 282, 1054-1060.
14. Kinali, M., Mercuri, E., Main, M., De Biasia, F., Karatza, A., Higgins, R., et al. (2002). Pilot trial of albuterol in spinal muscular atrophy. Neurology, 59, 609 - 610.
15. Linn, R.L., & Slinde, J.A. (1977). The determination of the significance of change between pre- and post-testing periods. Review of Educational Research, 47, 121-150.
16. Lord, F.M. (1967). A paradox in the interpretation of group comparisons. Psychological Bulletin, 68, 304-305.
17. Nesselroade, J.R., Stigler, S.M., & Baltes, P.B. (1980). Regression to the mean and the study of change. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 622-637.
18. Norris, S.L., & Atkins, D. (2005). Challenges in using nonrandomized studies in systematic reviews of treatment interventions. Annals of Internal Medicine, 142, 1112-1119.
19. Nunnally, J.C. (1975). The study of change in evaluation research: Principles concerning measurement, experimental design, and analysis. In E. L. Struening & M. Guttentag (Eds.), Handbook of evaluation research (Vol. 1, pp. 106-107). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
20. Pearce, K.A., Evans, G.W., Summerson, J., & Rao, J.S. (1997). Comparison of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and repeated office measurements in primary care. Journal of Family Practice, 45, 426-433.
21. Stergiou, G.S., Baibas, N.M., Gantzarou, A.P., Skeva, I.I., Kalkana, C.B., Roussias, L.G., et al. (2002). Reproducibility of home, ambulatory, and clinic blood pressure: implications for the design of trials for the assessment of antihypertensive drug efficacy. American Journal of Hypertension, 15, 101-104.
22. Stergiou, G.S., Efstathiou, S.P., Argyraki, C.K., Gantzarou, A.P., Roussias, L.G., & Mountokalakis, T.D. (2002). Clinic, home and ambulatory pulse pressure: comparison and reproducibility. Journal of Hypertension, 20, 1987-1993.
23. Stigler, S.M. (1997). Regression towards the mean, historically considered. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 6, 103-114.
24. Stroup, D.F., Berlin, J.A., Morton, S.C., Olkin, I., Williamson, G.D., Rennie, D., et al. (2000). Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: A proposal for reporting. Journal of the American Medical Association, 283, 2008-2012.
25. Thorndike, R.L. (1942). Regression fallacies in the matched groups experiment. Psychometrika, 7, 85-102.
26. West, S., King, V., Carey, T.S., Lohr, K.N., McKoy, N., Sutton, S.F., et al. (2002, April). Systems to rate the strength of scientific evidence (Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 47, Research Triangle Institute-University of North Carolina Evidence-Based Practice Center, Contract No. 290-97-0011; AHRQ Publication No. 02-E016). Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.